Early detection of Ovarian Cancer?

[ovadmin]

Interesting new details of a study with extracts published in the LA times... The research was done at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle. Difficult to know whether it's a false horizon or not as with many of these sorts of studies. But maybe of future relevance to the Ovacome BEAT campaign?

It shows that various cancer markers like CA 125 show up in blood tests long before symptoms occur - unfortunately they aren't accurately predictive until later, when cancers have reached an advanced stage.

From the LA times:

"A new study was published this week in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute. "What this study did was move one step closer to early detection," said Anderson, a biostatistician. "It gives us an idea of where we want to go, but doesn't solve the problem."

For several years, the ovarian cancer researchers have focused on biomarkers, proteins secreted by tumors, hoping to find one or more that show up early in the disease's progress. Few ovarian cancer cases are diagnosed early, when treatment has a high cure rate.

The researchers analyzed stored blood samples collected over several years for a previous research study involving female smokers. Ultimately, 34 of those women were diagnosed with ovarian cancer. Looking at the blood samples, taken periodically up to 18 years before diagnosis, the researchers found that three of six biomarkers, including one known as CA125, increased in cancer patients up to three years before diagnosis, compared with patients without ovarian cancer.

But at that early stage, the levels weren't high enough to accurately predict the disease, researchers found. A high degree of accuracy is required for such tests, the researchers wrote, "because a definitive diagnosis requires surgery."

Only at a year or less before the women were diagnosed did the biomarkers' levels in the blood become more accurate.

A cancer expert who was not involved in the study said any lead time could help.

"Finding ovarian cancer a year earlier could have a significant impact," said Dr. Barbara Goff, a surgeon and director of gynecologic oncology at the University of Washington. "Even three months makes a huge difference when you're going into someone's belly."

Goff said results may have been skewed because samples came from smokers. "It's unclear whether that could have altered the biologic nature of these biomarkers."

Even so, she termed the study's results "incredibly exciting -- but very, very preliminary."

Researcher Urban is an ovarian cancer survivor. She was diagnosed nearly 40 years ago virtually by accident, while she was being treated for another ovarian condition."

Watch this space maybe?

[Hidden]

This looks interesting - are there any doctors or nurses out there who know whether this means anything? You can never seem to tell whether these are false horizons or not