I have read the NICE outlines for RA. They are indeed nice. However they have no statutory meaning. I am surviving reasonably well on medication but have little meaningful understanding about how I shall decline. My access to medical professionals seems as slender as for everyone else.
An appointment to review my RA had been set up, the first GP version since I was diagnosed at Christmas 2020. The day before, I felt unwell and my heart rate became irregular and much faster than its usual 60-65, peaking at 105.
I felt better the next day and attended my appointment. I told him about the previous day's events and he decided he had to test me throughly. Fortunately all seemed well. He said there had really been little point in the testing since my symptoms had disappeared. I wondered how it might be possible to organise symptoms to match the only access available.
Some blood tests and an ECG were set up on the following few days. He said that if their results suggested a need he would set up an appointment, though there was really no prospect of a normal appointment for some weeks.
No urgent appoinment was set up, so I assume that my heart is OK. The RA review had been wasted. I have no idea if and when there may be another.
I feel quite ignorant about my RA and its prognosis. I appreciate that the NHS is overloaded, understaffed and underfunded. However, The comparison with the ideal (NICE) guidelines is remarkable. If it were for someone else in my family I would be quite angry.
However, I am already old and of little economic value. There is probably a good administrative case for euthanasia, though that may be morally and administratively tricky.