What Is An “EGFR,” And Why And When Does It... - Kidney Disease

Kidney Disease

12,449 members5,135 posts

What Is An “EGFR,” And Why And When Does It Matter?

12 Replies

This blog post was made by Dr. John Agar on April 12th, 2018.

What is an “eGFR,” and Why and When Does it Matter?

I often wonder why we tend to make kidney disease seem so mystical, so hard to understand…and so frightening. Of course, it can be all of those things, but many are unnecessarily frightened if explanations are too complex and a simple explanation is always the best. So, let me have a shot at unpacking the “mysteries” of kidney function, if or as it declines. What follows is the discussion I have about diminishing kidney function with my patients.

Rather fortuitously, a normal eGFR—a term that stands for estimated glomerular fltration rate, but that really means “effective kidney function”—is about 100. Forget the “units,” forget all that ‘mL/minute’ stuff: just think of a percentage (%) scale. In percentage terms, 100% means a “full house,” while 0% means “damn all of nothing.” As 100% dwindles to 0%, whatever is being measured (it doesn’t matter—it can be your finances, your kidney function, a town water supply—anything), it falls from ideal to nothing. So, as the eGFR dwindles for 100 to zero, kidney function falls from normal to nil.

Right. Now, imagine a factory with 100 workers making a product, an output. Next, just like on the Apprentice, fire 50 workers: halve the workforce. Those who remain at work will all have to work a bit harder. They will get a bit more over time, they will go home a bit later. They will get more tired, but they will manage. Some may even be chuffed that they are getting more overtime pay, and work a little harder. In kidney function terms, that’s called functional up-regulation! In a word, they will “cope.” They will sustain the factory output (maybe with some grumbling at the water-cooler), without any major or sustained disruption.

But, fire another half and things begin to unravel. Maybe if just a few more workers could have been retained, even as few as 1/3 of the original workforce... With only 25% of the workforce left of the original workers still on the factory floor (1 in 4), it is all too much! Too few are left to do the work.Those who remain are now clearly both over-worked and (likely) underpaid. They begin to leave. They jump ship. They fall ill, and can’t be replaced. Or, they fall away from sheer exhaustion. A point of no return has been passed. The “factory” begins to implode, as its workers quit, either by choice—or by death. A self-destructive pattern is established; A vicious cycle of factory implosion is guaranteed. The factory (and its output) is doomed.

And so it is with kidney disease, and, to be honest, it doesn’t really matter what the cause was. As functioning nephrons are lost and the eGFR dwindles and is lost, it is no different to the failing factory as its workers are fired, or quit. Eventually, the collapse of kidney function becomes an inevitable, self-fulfilling prophecy. So, if you have kidney disease of any cause, once about 2 in every 3 of your original full nephron workforce has been “taken out” by that disease, those that remain are destined to fail.

Even then, there is commonly lots that can be done to keep the struggling workforce afloat. This is the realm of good CKD management. The ultimate functional loss may not be averted—but it can be delayed and made much easier to tolerate. That said, the real battle is way back when the eGFR is greater than 50: that’s when the fight to preserve and protect really counts.

There is one caveat to this principle: age. As we humans age, our eGFR progressively diminishes in us all, from about the time we enter our fourth decade of life. Just as we age on the outside: our hair goes grey, we get wrinkles, our joints begin to ache in the mornings when we get up…we age inside too. Part of that ageing process affects kidneys and kidney function. The average human loses kidney function (eGFR) at around 8-10 ml/min per decade, each decade, after the early 30’s. This is a factor of aging.

At that rate—assuming a starting eGFR of 100—we would have to live to and beyond 130 years of age before we ran out from age-related loss. Of course, none of us live that long. Perish the thought! But, by the time we reach 80, for most of us, our eGFR will have roughly halved. But, so too has our solute load: we eat less, we do less, we generate less, and we don’t need as much eGFR as we might have done as a healthy active younger adult. To be truthful, an 80+ year old with an eGFR in the 25-30+ range is at little or no major risk, if all other markers of active kidney disease are absent and other health parameters are secure.

Sadly, lots of people don’t get this or are poorly informed. Lots of elderly people have the living daylights scared out of them by being told they have “kidney failure,” when, in truth, they have appropriately aged kidneys and are in no danger at all. Many live, unfairly, under a fear of death when—really—there is little or nothing to panic about. Older people tolerate a low eGFR, and often a very low eGFR without trouble.

We, in nephrology, “spook” far too many people, when reassurance and the pulling of gentle, low-key medical levers is all that is required. Sure, it is wise to exclude real markers of trouble by ensuring normal renal anatomy with an ultrasound and excluding nasty glomerular diseases by protein analyses. But, it is only rarely that these are found to be abnormal. If the only issue is an eGFR in an elderly person of 20-25 or so, then other than checking it now and then, nothing else is needed. Certainly not talk of dialysis.

To be truthful, the data suggests that an octogenarian does just as well, lives just as long, and is way less impacted by conservative care than those who (often quite inadvisably) are committed to dialysis. Of course, there ARE exceptions, but these ARE few.

Back, then, to the eGFR. Understand that the battle must be fought early. Understand that once too much is gone, progression is inevitable. But also understand that this paradigm is altered by advancing age, as older people need less functional “grunt” to stay well. So, if and as you approach and pass 80, there is actually much less to get your knickers in a knot over!

Understanding eGFR—and all its implications, both good and bad—matters.

I hope this helps those who still have questions about GFR and CKD.

Read more about...
12 Replies
Betsysue2002 profile image
Betsysue2002

Excellent information. Thank you 😺

SaraEads profile image
SaraEads

Excellent and thank you!

Bet117 profile image
Bet117NKF Ambassador

Outstanding post as always!! :)

Hatcher profile image
Hatcher in reply toBet117

Excellent post. Everyone should be able to understand that.

Missyclare profile image
Missyclare

I love this. Thank you :)

Barty11 profile image
Barty11

What an excellent concise summary of the condition. I do believe I can stop worrying. Such a relief. Many thanks.

lowraind profile image
lowraind

Interesting! Thank you.

Pas246 profile image
Pas246

What is eGFR normal range for ages in the 60’s? I can’t seem to

find it or get a straight answer from my primary care dr. My sister is

on dialysis at age 61. This is the cause of my curiosity. Thank you for

a good, understandable article.

in reply toPas246

There is not a "normal" number for GFR based on age. Everyone is different. Even if you and your sister have an inherited condition your kidneys will function based on your other health issues, medications, diet, and exercise. There are folks in the 80's with strong functional kidneys and there are young people with failing kidneys not due to hereditary issues.

Know your health issues, lab values and what foods to avoid and make a plan and stick to it. Based on that information and what your doctors say develop an exercise program that will work for you in all weather conditions. Don't smoke and if you drink, cut way back if not out altogether.

Pas246 profile image
Pas246

My GFR was 72 when I was worked up for kidney donation. I flunked. Needed 80. I passed all tests and am healthy as a horse except for exercising. (Age68). Very disappointing Thank you for your time😊

in reply toPas246

You are at Stage 2 for CKD. Adjusting your diet and starting an exercise regime is going to help you stay away from dialysis and kidney failure so don't wait too long to begin. If you have no other health issues then you need to concern yourself with the normal aging issues of anyone our age. Best of luck.

Pas246 profile image
Pas246 in reply to

Thanks

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

My eGFR is better and creatinine is normal

I just got my lab result today. My kidney function is up from 53 to 65 in 3 weeks. I've made diet...
Granny401 profile image

Over 65? Newly low eGFR?

In the three years I've participated here I see many posts from new folks that do not include their...
barbara55109 profile image

Kidney failure definition

My mum's elderly aunt was recently told by her GP that she had kidney failure despite having an...
userotc profile image

A Simple explanation of the inaccuracies of eGFR

Please note I don’t condone what they are preaching just hope this better explains why, as so many...

50 year old with chronic kidney disease

Hi there, I'm in Ireland and found out last year from having some routine bloods done that I have...
Lav1 profile image

Moderation team

See all
PattyM_NKF profile image
PattyM_NKFModerator
DorisL_NKF profile image
DorisL_NKFModerator

Top community tags

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.