Does frenulum look tight to you? Also does my frenulum look continuous and complete or does it appear that structures are missing? I was circumcised as an infant, so I am just curious. Notice that there is a color difference, what does that mean? I am trying to figure out how different my frenulum would have looked had my penis not been circumcised as an infant. Any ideas?
Thanks for all your help
Written by
At1012
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Yes, but what I noticed is that when I went to a urologist for a checkup 2 weeks ago, they pulled on the head of my penis and this caused the frenulum to break, but what was strange is that there was no blood. I remember the next morning I urinated and I felt discomfort right below the urethra on the underside of my penis. I have also noticed that my glans no longer gets firm during an erection.
I am freaking out. I am just regretful for going to the doctor in the first place. Is it normal for a urologist to pull on the glans away from the body?
Also I noticed that during my original circumcision as an infant, part of the frenular tissue is located midshaft. This must be the reason why my frenulum was always tight my whole life. Circumcision induced tight frenulum.
When it was attached it was tight, but I was fine with it. It felt much better when it was attached as you see in this photo, since this photo was taken 2 months ago. Maybe I should get my frenulum reattached completely as I love the look of an uncircumcised penis with the beautiful frenular delta.
Interesting, I’m not sure if I could do that. I am starting to wonder if restoring my foreskin is causing me to have more sensations that are just foreign to me because I lived my whole life circumcised. I have been restoring for the last 5 months.
I’ve grown a good amount considering I started off with a trapped penis. I am a member of that website. I have been doing Manuel methods. I have been doing this for 5 months so far. They removed so much from my circumcision because it was a jewish one and they remove as much as possible to try and prevent Jews from restoring their foreskins. They used to remove a lot less. Since you are uncircumcised, when the skin moves, is the scrotum skin supposed to move with the shaft skin? Or is the scrotum skin supposed to be relaxed? Also does your shaft skin have hair on it? I am trying to differentiate between the shaft skin and the scrotal skin.
You can see in my frenulum, I have the part of the frenulum located near the mucocutaneous junction while yours doesn’t. Your foreskin was retractable when getting circumcised while in my circumcision as an infant, I was not retractable.
Maybe I don’t understand what u try to tell me but for me u have ur full frenulum and I do have it all u touched so I’m not quite sure if I understand what u mean I saw all the previous images including the info graphic the colorful one
Notice the chunk of tissue mid-shaft from that same image I just gave you. That is the frenulum at the mucocutaneous region. In your picture, they removed that chunk. There is raw tissue in that area on your penis. The mucocutaneous region is right at the tip of the foreskin. I just realized that the scar line that I thought was a scar line is really the ridge band, which is the highly innervated tissue located just inside the tip of foreskin. People always told me that, wow you have no scar line. Now I understand what they mean. They removed just about all the shaft skin. On the underside there is no shaft skin at all. The scrotal skin has taken the place of the shaft skin. This explains why I had painful tightness and discomfort at the ridge band area. It also explains my issues with wearing underwear.
Do you have a photo of what your frenulum looked like before circumcision?
Well then let me tell u seems it depends on the type of cut not it’s totally different if they cut u right the penis grow and the scar line is positioned in different level as it stretch over penis growth and also the frenulum also grow to be perfectly normal if the cut is done correctly
Yep, this makes sense because circumcision causes it to likely detach in some way. I have all the tissue of the frenulum, I believe part of it has been detached, which is why it doesn’t look complete. Look at this picture:
I have the frenulum near the mucocutaneous junction. Notice that chunk in the middle of the shaft. What’s interesting is that this part of the frenulum is fused to the scrotal skin, which shows all shaft skin was removed, while all sensory tissue was preserved.
Cock looks stunning, not dissimilar to mine. Dousnt look abnormal at All
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.