Help interpreting FibroSure Test Results - Living with Fatty...

Living with Fatty Liver and NASH

8,400 members2,196 posts

Help interpreting FibroSure Test Results

Shershahsuri profile image
2 Replies

Dear Forum Members,

I would welcome thoughts from experienced forum members/participants (I'll be following up with a liver specialist as well). Last year I had a FibroSure test done in November (2020) and my Fibrosis score was 0.11 (so no fibrosis) but my Steotosis score was 0.62 (moderate) and NASH was "probable/borderline" (AST/ALT were high at AST:34 and ALT:74). I improved my diet and lost some weight and in Jan/Feb and my doctor said to take the same test in 6 months to a year (we had some other tests done that had potentially ruled out other causes i.e. genetic, hemochromatosis etc.). I just took the test again and it looks like my Steotosis score has improved to 0.36 ("No Steatosis - Minimal Steatosis") and Necroinflamm at 0.25 so "not NASH". My AST/ALT levels are normal (AST:22, ALT:21) but my Fibrosis score has gone UP to 0.24 from 0.11 (F0-F1, which seems to indicate some mild fibrosis, there is no description of this borderline stage in the test results).

I need help understanding why my Fibrosis score has gone up while all other indicators have improved (could it be just test variance/unpredictability at lower levels as its still at the no/mild stage? or did I experience some fibrosis as my other indicators improved?).

I still need to lose ~8 pounds to be in normal BMI range so will be working on that (also haven't completely cut out fast food, although have drastically reduced it).

Thank you!

Written by
Shershahsuri profile image
Shershahsuri
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
2 Replies
nash2 profile image
nash2Partner

Can't know for sure but odds are it is a statistical variation. Hard to tell about individual components at low levels. All of your other markers are looking better so that is all supportive. I wouldn't worry too much about it but be sure to get your next round of testing which will help add a bit of certainty. Also, do be best to yourself and stick to the best diet that you can. It really matters.

Shershahsuri profile image
Shershahsuri in reply tonash2

Thank you for the note nash2. I did get a chance to speak to the specialist and he basically said the same thing i.e. the test results really only suggest a few things: high probability of "Not Nash", "Mild Steatosis" and "Minor/Mild Scarring". Wants me to continue to improve diet, continue to exercise and to pay attention to cholesterol/fructose intake. He then will do a Fibroscan next time I'm in the clinic (say 3-6 months). Biggest issue for me is diet and so need to be better on that front.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

I'm a newby here and so confused

I have had elevated LFTs for a couple of years now. They kind of fluctuate in and out of normal...
Trodriguez profile image

First ever Fibroscan with results.....

If anyone has questions, comments, or advice your response is sincerely appreciated. Just for...

I am new...I would like to know the meaning of my results...

September 25, 2018 I had my first fibro scan...these are my results from then...CAP: 305 db/M;...
Purmaple11 profile image

Blood work back to normal. NASH is gone?

Hello community, I wanted to check if some of you had a similar situation. Long story short i had...
Baracuda25 profile image

AST/ALT ratio & Fib-4 tests

Hi folks, I read online that an AST/ALT ratio greater than 1.2 can mean advanced liver disease. On...
ToughToes profile image