Red Meat Is NOT Bad For You After All! Ji... - Cure Parkinson's

Cure Parkinson's

26,504 members27,915 posts

Red Meat Is NOT Bad For You After All! Jimmy Dore Show with Dr. Drew

Bolt_Upright profile image
30 Replies

Jimmy Dore has had a huge influence on me in the last 10 years. He is a stand up comedian and one of the most important and honest video journalists of our time. He does his YouTube show out of his garage, but he is kind of a big deal (1.3 million subscribers). Jimmy's show is not G rated.

So this video is about red meat not being bad for you, AND it is about how poorly these medical studies we all study are done. They also talk about good diet basics, good doctors, and why drug companies advertise so much (it is not to help them sell drugs).

I think this video has a lot of important information and wisdom, but Jimmy's show has an edge, so if you find it not your cup of tea, please just stop the video.

Edit: It looks like YouTube did not like Jimmy's video. Fortunately, Rumble is fine with it: rumble.com/v4d46kc-red-meat...

Written by
Bolt_Upright profile image
Bolt_Upright
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
30 Replies
gomelgo profile image
gomelgo

"this video is private"

Bolt_Upright profile image
Bolt_Upright in reply togomelgo

It looks like YouTube did not like Jimmy's video. Fortunately, Rumble is fine with it: rumble.com/v4d46kc-red-meat...

Eryl profile image
Eryl

Most mainstream dietary advice is influenced by Big Food and is wrong. youtu.be/EFtMw2ow95M?si=u6o...

Eryl profile image
Eryl

youtu.be/xzy3RtjJHFg?si=skz...

bassofspades profile image
bassofspades

well what do you know? 😜

JayPwP profile image
JayPwP in reply tobassofspades

The tide is turning...

JayPwP profile image
JayPwP

Thank you Bolt

GermanShepherd79 profile image
GermanShepherd79

scientific studies are not reliable, that is the truth. I was reading one recently about whether, I think it was citicholine and carnitine supplements cause atherosclerosis. I believe those were the two, but the study I’m going to tell you about was only for one of them. The study used two groups, the womens group was from 1980 for a specified number of years, but the mens group was from 1986. That was odd.

they eliminated certain people from each group if at the beginning of the study… the person had cancer for example. That is perfectly reasonable. But if the person developed diabetes with cardiovascular disease during the study, then they eliminated that person. That is not reasonable. They are manipulating the data.

This was a retrospective study meaning they just looked at data that had already been reported. Basically these groups of people answered a questionair every six months about what they were eating. It also asked them questions about medical diagnoses. Nobody remembers what they ate six months ago. That is ridiculous. Their focus was on eggs and meat because in the real world that is where the natural form of the substance they were looking for would occur. No one was taking the supplement under investigation. When all was said and done, these “investigators” reported that the supplement substance was associated with increased atherosclerosis. Removing people who developed atherosclerosis related diseases, let’s say if they were vegan, would skew the results. What researchers do is give the results to statisticians who break down the groups into multiple sub groups and remove any if they realize that would make their numbers look better.

There are other substances in meat and eggs besides the one that was supposed to be the subject of study. And the substance may well exist in other foods. they relied on people remembering what they had eaten six months ago when they answered a questionnaire. This study was, as we used to say, garbage in and garbage out.

I read a study about the safety of Stevia with regard to the kidneys. After all the data was collected, the results showed that Stevie did not affect the kidneys but it did raise liver function tests. The researchers did not report the adverse effect of Stevia because they said they weren’t looking for elevated liver function tests. So why did they do the liver function tests. Who knows but people are using that study to say that Stevia is safe. It is important to read the studies yourself and understand what they mean.

We can no longer trust researchers, there’s a scandal right now concerning three Harvard researchers and fake data. We cannot trust medical journals who are controlled by people like Fauci who have a vested interest in the results. We certainly cannot trust the FDA as they get big money from pharmaceutical companies.

Your doctor cannot possibly read every article about every disease. He relies on medical journals which we now understand are corrupt. We need to protect ourselves the best we can, but we can’t read everything either.

Eryl profile image
Eryl in reply toGermanShepherd79

Most scientific studies agree with whoever is funding the study which is predominantly Big Food or Big Pharma. If a study is likely to show Big Food or Big Pharma in a bad light then it will find it very hard to find funding.

GermanShepherd79 profile image
GermanShepherd79 in reply toEryl

can’t disagree with that. It wasn’t always this way though.

Bolt_Upright profile image
Bolt_Upright in reply toEryl

When I was a kid I read this famous book: How to Lie with Statistics. It showed me how toothpaste companies would keep running small sample studies on their toothpaste's ability to fight cavities until they got a study with great results. Then they stop the studies.

Bolt_Upright profile image
Bolt_Upright in reply toGermanShepherd79

That is one awesomely written comment! Thanks!

GermanShepherd79 profile image
GermanShepherd79 in reply toBolt_Upright

Thanks

Thal profile image
Thal

Red meat is NOT bad for you but bad for your bank account. At 40$ a pound buys me 50 pounds of potatoes. Guess that's why they call it the diet of Kings and Queens. Or go hunting for road kill.

Had take out last night. Beef with bitter melon and sticky rice single portion 32$. And very little meat. Won't be doing that for a while. Good thing Valentine's Day is only once a year.

Big Farma is out to bankrupt us.

Bolt_Upright profile image
Bolt_Upright in reply toThal

Ah! Now I know who Thal is. Cool.

JayPwP profile image
JayPwP in reply toBolt_Upright

Who?... Who?... Who?... 😜

Hope-full1970 profile image
Hope-full1970

The MIND diet is supposed to be the best diet for PD patients according to Dr.Mischley. You can have Red meat no more than 4 times a week. That surprised me! It says 1 time a week is better but it's flexible. Fish once a week, chicken twice a week. I get a little concerned PD makes us obsessed with what we eat. We need to keep our weight up and have a good balanced diet.

shaken-not-stirred profile image
shaken-not-stirred in reply toHope-full1970

Pwp and I eat what we like - red meat, white meat, fish, bacon, ham - summer salads - winter soups and veges - real butter, cream, whole milk, fizzy drinks, pwp has a very sweet tooth so anything goes. Typically 3 nights meat and vege/salad - 1 night fish and salad/chips - 3 nights light meals eg: bacon, lettuce, tomato - burgers with salad - quiche and salad - toasties or under the grill - in winter lots of home made soups. Both at normal weight - blood pressure good - active as we can be with afflictions in our 70's ( physical) - don't get flu's or covid - keep our immune systems charged up - in other words disgustingly healthy😉 I do not eat until midday ( intermittent fast) - pwp eats after he has had acv and before he has his 1st meds for the day ( this can be anything he feels like) and has no issues with his meds with this regime. To my mind do what suits you and bugger what the "experts" think!

GermanShepherd79 profile image
GermanShepherd79 in reply toshaken-not-stirred

I agree. My husband and I are not diabetic. He has PD and I have my own medical issues. Our lives are very restricted in many ways. We are not adding dieting to it. We are not eating fast foods and chips (that kind of thing) , but beyond that, we eat what we want.

Hope-full1970 profile image
Hope-full1970 in reply toshaken-not-stirred

Good for you! That sounds like a great diet and it's working for you. I agree eat a variety of foods and eat what you want.

Bolt_Upright profile image
Bolt_Upright in reply toHope-full1970

I appreciate Dr.Mischley, but a lot of her research is like that discussed in the video: Questionnaires asking people to recall what they ate. And then, for things like Dairy, they lump all types of dairy together, both fermented and unfermented. I suspect she leans on previous studies (that we see may mean nothing) in choosing what is best also.

Hope-full1970 profile image
Hope-full1970 in reply toBolt_Upright

I bought the MIND diet book but haven't followed it. I figure if I'm working hard to stay fit, I'm going to eat what I want. I have always had a healthy diet and been very heath concious. What's weird is I have been less concerned since my diagnosis. I used to avoid sugar now I love sugar 😋

Bolt_Upright profile image
Bolt_Upright in reply toHope-full1970

"Lately, studies have shown that patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) report a strong craving for sweets and consume significantly more fast-acting carbohydrates than healthy controls. Consuming food with a high-sugar content is assumed to lead to an increase in insulin concentration, which could positively influence dopamine concentration in the brain and unconsciously be used by patients as kind of “self-medication” to compensate for a lack of dopamine in PD. On the other hand, high-sugar intake could also lead to insulin resistance and diabetes, which is discussed as a causative factor for progressive neurodegeneration in PD. In this critical appraisal, we discuss the role of sugar intake and insulin on dopamine metabolism in patients with PD and how this could influence the potential neurodegeneration mediated by insulin resistance."

Parkinson’s Disease and Sugar Intake—Reasons for and Consequences of a Still Unclear Craving 2022 ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl...

Hope-full1970 profile image
Hope-full1970 in reply toBolt_Upright

This is good to keep in mind. I do love chocolate.....I eat a couple pieces a day. I'll try to keep a limit on it and not go overboard. Thanks for the article!

Bolt_Upright profile image
Bolt_Upright in reply toHope-full1970

I am not suggesting anybody reduce their sugar intake. Please see my new post: healthunlocked.com/cure-par...

Hope-full1970 profile image
Hope-full1970 in reply toBolt_Upright

Yes, I saw that. Somewhere in the middle is good

I don't think I consume too much. I can see it's probably helping me out a little with dopamine

jeffmayer profile image
jeffmayer

I don't think it's bad for you it's how oftenayou eat it

SAGoodman profile image
SAGoodman

Thanks for sharing Bolt, informative and enjoyable!

Bolt_Upright profile image
Bolt_Upright in reply toSAGoodman

Thanks. Just be careful. If you start watching Jimmy Dore you will be red pilled.

SAGoodman profile image
SAGoodman in reply toBolt_Upright

Understood! 😂😂

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Cholesterol Is GOOD For Your Arteries & Statins Are Harmful? Jimmy Dore Show

Warnings: 1- Jimmy swears at one point in this video. 2 - If you start watching Jimmy Dore...
Bolt_Upright profile image

The Crisis in Theoretical Physics and Dr Gundry?

So I watched the Dr Gundry video Marc posted last night. I watched all 105 minutes:...
Bolt_Upright profile image

Great video on healing a "leaky gut" and I found this probiotic to be the best deal on Amazon!

For myself ... I believe my PD-like symptoms is from my "leaky gut". And, fortunately after more...

Caffeine and progression of Parkinson’s disease: A deleterious interaction with Creatine

So I was thinking of adding Creatine to my stack based on a VERY positive video I watched from a...

Still no sleep

Friday night ,Sat morning 4am gmt , when will these fucken sleepless nights end , just about going...