What do all these Vaccine Efficacy Numbers tha... - CLL Support

CLL Support

22,532 members38,709 posts

What do all these Vaccine Efficacy Numbers that they quote actually mean?

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator
10 Replies

Efficacy is a crucial concept in vaccine trials, but it’s also a tricky one. If a vaccine has an efficacy of, say, 95 percent, that doesn’t mean that 5 percent of people who receive that vaccine will get Covid-19. In addition, just because one vaccine ends up with a higher efficacy estimate than another in trials doesn’t necessarily mean it’s superior.

Here’s why: For statisticians, efficacy is a measurement of how much a vaccine lowers the risk of an outcome. For example, Johnson & Johnson observed how many people who received a vaccine nevertheless got Covid-19. Then they compared that to how many people contracted Covid-19 after receiving a placebo.

The difference in risk can be calculated as a percentage. Zero percent means that vaccinated people are at as much risk as people who got the placebo. A hundred percent means that the risk was entirely eliminated by the vaccine. In the United States trial site, Johnson & Johnson determined that the efficacy is 72 percent.

Efficacy can also change when scientists look at different outcomes. Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine had an 85 percent efficacy rate against severe cases of Covid-19, for example. That’s important to know, because it means that the vaccine will prevent a lot of hospitalizations and deaths.

For a number of reasons, it’s not possible to make a precise comparison between vaccines. One vaccine may have a higher estimate than another, but their confidence intervals (the range of possible results) may overlap. That effectively makes their results indistinguishable.

Making matters more complicated, the vaccines were tested on different groups of people at different stages in the pandemic. In addition, their efficacy was measured in different ways. Johnson & Johnson’s efficacy was measured 28 days after a single dose, for example, while Moderna’s was measured 14 days after a second dose.

What’s clear is that all three vaccines made by Johnson & Johnson, Moderna, and Pfizer and BioNTech — greatly reduce the risk of getting Covid-19 and as if they have a high efficacy against more serious outcomes like hospitalization and death.

Once a vaccine goes into widespread use, researchers follow its performance. Instead of efficacy, these scientists now measure effectiveness: how much the vaccine reduces the risk of a disease out in the real world, in millions of people rather than the thousands that were in the studies. Early studies on the effectiveness of coronavirus vaccines are confirming that they provide strong protection.

In the months to come, researchers will keep an eye on this data to see if they become less effective — either because the immunity from the vaccine wanes or because a new variant arises. In either case, new vaccines will be created, and manufacturers will provide new measures of their efficacy.

Jackie

Written by
Jm954 profile image
Jm954
Administrator
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
10 Replies
JigFettler profile image
JigFettlerVolunteer

Thank you for this Jackie. Great stuff. Really helpful.

I was listening to podcast from a couple of US Drs. They were talking about this. Summary: we only need enough vaccine effected immunity to stop Covid. That "enough number is around 70%. Does not need 100%. Herd immunity indeed.

Jig

Psmithuk profile image
Psmithuk

Cheering news, Jackie, thanks for this clear summary.

Cx

pkguk2 profile image
pkguk2PartnerCLL Support Association

Great summary Jackie. Thanks.

bennevisplace profile image
bennevisplace

Quite right, efficacy in clinical trials were higher than anticipated and gave us hope. But how vaccines perform in the real world is what counts. With 1.1 million vaccinated in Scotland, and an 81 percent reduction in severe Covid in the over 80s, after just one shot, the Pfizer and AZ vaccines are performing pretty darned well. bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n52....

Mystic75 profile image
Mystic75

Thanks Jackie,

This is very helpful. Again, 'the devil is in the details'!

Do you know if the participants in the trial, who contracted COVID, contracted it in a real world setting?

D.

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator in reply to Mystic75

If you mean did they contract covid going about their normal day to day lives then yes. They weren't deliberately infected, that is known as a challenge trial and those are just starting to take place.

Mystic75 profile image
Mystic75 in reply to Jm954

Yes, that's what I meant. Thanks!

Ernest2 profile image
Ernest2

Great post Jackie.

bkoffman profile image
bkoffmanCLL CURE Hero

Jackie, well written explanation. Thanks Brian

Fran57 profile image
Fran57

Thanks Jackie for a very clear explanation.

Stay safe,

Fran 🙂

You may also like...

What do the numbers mean?

does anyone have any idea what my numbers might mean? As they say no news is good news but the...

Reduced vaccine efficacy

with. We are seeing hospitalisations and death in vaccinated people in these categories. Not trying...

Antibody Testing After Getting the COVID-19 Vaccine: What to Know If You’re Immunocompromised

org/living-with-arthritis/coronavirus/covid-19-vaccines/antibody-testing-covid-19-vaccine-immunocomp

Good news on vaccine efficacy for the 80%

following COVID-19 vaccination plateaus after the third vaccine . ... Regardless of vaccine dose...

What To Ask? And Why? And What Does It All Mean?

period. I have been advised that approx 30% of people diagnosed don't ever need treatment, I hope...