Hi All,
I am posting from the Cafe Kerouac In Columbus OH awaiting another 12 week monitoring session for my extended Clinical Trial using PCI-32765 (Ibrutinib). It has been 6 years and 9 months since I started therapy.
From an anxious post by an HU CLL forum member over a high ZAP-70 report I got inspired to write an article focussing on ZAP-70. ZAP-70 is frequently ordered in an attempt to assess prognosis along with other commonly known tests such as FISH (Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization) that looks for chromosome aberrations, CD38 and IGHV mutation status. ZAP-70 is reported as a pathologically active marker in CLL if it is positively expressed on >20% of B cells or if less than <20% it is considered negative – a switch on or off metaphor. This is overly simplistic for ZAP-70 is much more. When I was diagnosed with very favorable markers but with a sole exception of a very high ZAP-70 (58%+) I wanted to learn more which eventually led me to gamble on a very early Clinical Trial using PCI-32765 (Ibrutinib) after failing two standard therapies.
For a window into the complexity of CLL I invite you to go to the just published CLL Tribune cllsociety.org/the-cll-trib... for my journey with CLL and a closer look at ZAP-70. CLL can be a nasty killer and cat like in its habit of playing with us like a captive mouse over time. My philosophy has been to let CLL be my teacher not my fear. Learning biology through the lens of CLL has been both an education and has helped me to cope, arming me with knowledge to make better treatment decisions.
WWW