I apologize for how long this may end up...I am confused and in absolute panic (I also have serious health anxiety):
Over the past nearly two years, I've had an enlarged liver with fatty infiltration, jaundice, weight loss, etc...and my gallbladder has had stones and a adenoma which had not changed between two ultrasounds. The liver inflammation went down, my bloods returned to normal, and my liver was recovering. My gastro said we would check the gallbladder again for stability in a year and decide whether or not my gallbladder would need to be removed. I have never had pain, nor any problems caused by it at all.
It has been a year and my ultrasound was completed two weeks ago. It showed a completely recovered and healthy liver which was no longer enlarged and had no fatty infiltration anymore. Also, the radiologist recorded the same findings as previous ultrasounds for the gallbladder with gallstones and an adenoma, no wall thickening, no signs of cholecystitis, and I thought that even though all was not perfect, it was at least stable. The gastro noted on the portal that he was going to talk to the radiologist about stability and follow up with me.
---Here is where the shock came in: I received a phone call from the gastro yesterday telling me that the radiologist made an addendum to my ultrasound results after the gastro had talked to him and that they had found a 2cm (really large) unidentified soft tissue something in my liver and although it's not extremely likely to be a mass/carcinoma, it can't be ruled out. I read the addendum which was added right before the phone call and it was described in great detail as a 2cm soft tissue finding that could be a group of stones, sludge, or a mass and had some amount of shadowing.
This addendum was made a full two weeks after the ultrasound was completed and only after my gastro contacted the radiologist to ask about the stability of the original small adenoma. Now the gastro is pushing for me to have my gallbladder removed even though he knew that was something I was going to try to avoid and he has set me up with an MRI (which I insisted on because he wanted to rush me right into having my gallbladder out citing this new urgency). I've read that a polyp or mass of that size carries a greater likelihood of malignancy and I am really scared!
Questions:
Why would the radiologist not have reported a potential mass that large on the original report and then added it on a full two weeks later (without seeing nor testing me again within that time)? I don't understand why the original report said exactly the same thing as the previous two, but was amended two entire weeks later to say I now may have a potentially serious mass.
If there was a concern about whatever this thing is, shouldn't it have been reported in the first place?
Also, does gallbladder removal put added stress on the liver? I have worked pretty hard to restore my liver health and I am afraid of taking a huge step backward.
Any insight would be appreciated. Thank you in advance.