even in the paper, if you read it to the end, it concludes that the risk is not proven -
Researchers generally say a study has failed to demonstrate an association if the chances are higher than 5 percent that the association is due to chance, so the paper - in an abundance of caution - characterizes the association as proven for the STEMI group and unproven for the overall group.
And this is just one study .
I'm sorry, I don't understand what this post is about, haven't seen another post.
Could you explain a little further aardvark68, as I, too, don’t know what it is you’re referring to therefore can’t make a comment other than this one.
What are you talking about? What is not proven?
I know which post you are referring to and what it is that hasn't been proven. I think it's more than unfortunate this topic is not allowed to be discussed. However more and more information is available for those who, like me, seek it out. None of it is as it was made out, and I'm amazed that like many others I'm still being offered the injections. Never have, never will. Good luck to you!
Does this article which dispels some of the misinformation and myths help?
academic.oup.com/eurheartj/...
Yes - and that’s a much more reliable and larger study than the other one which was removed
have found it useful, and for informed decision making, to look at documentation produced by NHS for all these things which are offered
Please give it a rest. You know exactly what the policy here is. And most informed people know what sort of crazy theories this could encourage. The science is clear and most people know that exceptions tend to prove the rule.
Big Scar Recent News.
Recent post about vaccine and booster deleted.
semaglutide….the ‘fat’drug !
