I was found to have, via CT Angiogram, in July 16, a very high Calcium Agatston score of 1315.
I then had CABG in Feb 17 at age 66. The day before I asked if it was possible to do a biopsy of a plaque, to help in identifying what they contained. They said it was not possible. Is this correct?
I understand that plaques consist of - cholesterol, fatty substances, fibrin, calcium and cellular waste.
My total cholesterol has always been Low at about 3.0 to 3.6 on a vegan diet since age 40 - 71 now.
So, 'reviewing' the above, I consider that cholesterol was unlikely to be a plaque constituent, as it has always been so low.
Not sure about the other factors - however, I would place calcium at the top of the list.
This is because I took 2.4 g of calcium (twice the recommended dose) since the age of 40, when I became vegan and found out that calcium is low in a vegan diet. Since, August 17, I have been taking only 1.2 g calcium, the recommended dose. And Vit K2/Mk7, which my wife found for me - as this removes calcium from the blood and deposits it in the bones.
I had 2 scans last year and the results were Full Flow. So, for now, I am very happy with that and will continue the above.
Why did you have the CABG? What were your symptoms at the time? Were you having angina that was interferring with your life and your activities? Or did you have CABG just because of your high coronary artery calcium score?
Considering your coronary artery calcium score, I would not be taking supplemental calcium pills.
Have you looked into the calcium content of Edamame and even 'regular' soybeans?
Collard greens; turnip greens; kale; mustard greens; beet greens; bok choy; figs, etc etc etc.
Look at all the vegan wild animals.
They meet their calcium requirements obviously without calcium supplementation.
I have an even higher coronary artery calcium score than you and for that reason would never take calcium supplements.
And my cardiologists do not recommend stents or bypass because I do not have angina and am able to walk/hike/jog and run without chest pain or other cardiac symptoms.
Were you having significant cardiac symptoms with functional activities prior to your CABG?
I have a significant blockage of my left anterior descending coronary artery, aka 'the widow maker'.
Whilst it can be done it is rarely done as the risks usually outweigh any clinical benefit. Apart from academic interest what would you expect to gain from it?!
Good point. The more you look into this, the more it starts to occur to you that in reality the whole subject is not really understood? This was stressed during my Rehab, particularly with other countries who do all the wrong things and have a very low incidence of CHD. It seems all we can do is make what we think are informed choices based on medical advice and hope for the best, unfortunately.
I agree with Dolphin and Michael, the risks would greatly out weigh the benefits. For this reason I would be surprised if any doctor would perform such a biopsy.
In this case 'curiosity could kill the cat. '
It is also possible to have a heart attack without obstructed coronary arteries. It's not just about the blockages.
I think the OP was suggesting the biopsy could be done on the old arteries while they were doing the CABG, as in the bypassed ones? I have no idea how worth-wile or dangerous that would be.
I'll bow to your knowledge I had imagined the offending artery would now be "out of the loop" as in bypassed but I presume it is not totally bypassed, as in you can still drive through the village sort of thing?
I agree with you that there would be risks doing a biopsy of a ‘live’ artery.
However, I thought the whole purpose of a Bypass is to graft new ‘roads’ and permanently seal off the old ones? So, there would not be any risk at all, as once the biopsy is taken, the artery is closed off?
Is this correct?
Or, are the bypassed arteries left ‘live’?
Thanks
Alps
• in reply to
Hi
Yes I asked the day before my CABG if they could do a biopsy and they said it was not possible.
And yes, I thought they could take a biopsy from one of the permanently ‘closed-off’ arteries?
• in reply to
Just had a look at the description of the operation, sounds like the graft just "tees" into the artery beyond the blockage rather than actually bypassing it.
Hi Alps, very interesting post and profile. I don't really know what to say to be honest and it seems that the professionals are struggling as well. I am afraid we seem to be dealing with a very non-exact science, but I just wanted to ask, with respect - do you think that your decrease in performance could not be attributed at least in part to your advancing age? I have also been into running most of my life and lay-offs last year due to other problems have not helped but it just seems to get harder as the years go by, which I guess is natural? I now have to console myself that my 6 years junior wife is now able to beat me over 5K (albeit it in a decent time) despite her only getting into running in the last 2 years, it has seemed to be really tough to maintain any sort of consistency lately. I know how you must feel life is tough sometimes.
• in reply to
Hi
I was riding my bike at 17 AV in November 16.
Then, after just 6 doses of Simvastatin 5 mgs, my AV speed dropped to 12 because the Vastus Medialii became achy.
Nothing to do with age at all.
Keep up your sport
Thanks
Alps
• in reply to
It does appear they have a really bad effect on some people, you have my sympathy it must be exceedingly frustrating. Can they not offer any explanation as to why you have not recovered after stopping them?
Most cholesterol is made by your own body. If your diet is low in cholesterol then your liver makes more, if your diet is high in cholesterol your body makes less. The bottom line is that for the great majority of people diet has little impact on your cholesterol levels. For supporting evidence you could look at these studies,
Another important point is that cholesterol isn't the only cause of plaque. Nicotine, stress, background inflammation, airborne pollutants, excessive alcohol, trans fats, gum disease, and many other factors can all initiate and promote the growth of plaque.
Final point, the cholesterol found within plaque is a very specific sub category of cholesterol, high density LDL cholesterol. Furthermore the version within plaque is oxidised, but science hasn't yet established if this oxidation takes place before or after these cholesterol particles pass through the arterial wall. Our overall cholesterol scores are only an approximate indicator of cardiovascular risk, and a vegan diet on its own cannot guarantee protection against atherosclerosis.
Enjoy your poached eggs, I doubt they'll cause you any harm!
Personally I'm having prawns for lunch, which are famously high in cholesterol. However, I had my annual cardio check up last week and my cholesterol score was only 2.6, so again I don't think I'm at risk.
I was however disappointed to discover during the cardio check-up that my HbA1c score has crept back up ever so slightly to 34. Still well within the safe zone, but any upward move needs monitoring.
So for me it may well be that I can eat lots of eggs, prawns, or other high cholesterol foods and still keep my atherosclerosis under control, but too much sugar or carbs and I might be in real trouble if that cranks my HbA1c scores any higher.
I guess we're all different, and each of us metabolises food in our individual way, so it's unlikely there's any one diet that's right for all of us.
Well I read the article first and enjoyed them even more. Yeah I know prawns are high in it but you can't beat a good prawn curry or linguine now and again, a man's got to live on the edge. I am currently looking into links with Gum Disease which I have had all my life, along with a family history so I am doomed.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.
Coronary Calcium Score test
Is there agreement that Cholesterol should be low?
Newbie to BHF - LAD atherosclerosis and high cholesterol (8.4mmol)
UK cholesterol checks 
