As a bronchiectasis patient I sometimes wonder if I am suffering from an identity crisis. I ask myself when I have been to my GP, who has spent most of my ten minutes slot gazing at a screen whilst reducing me, my condition, to a "reading", whatever happened to the personal relationship between a doctor and the patient? The doctor "reads" me, then pushes a PRINT key and I "read" my prescription as I go to my pharmacist. Next patient please.
Obviously this scenario depends on what I have told the GP at the beginning of my consultation, the gravity or otherwise of my condition, whether or not I ask for a referral to a specialist, to a clinic, or I want a physical examination. In other words, a non-routine visit. And how much of this procedure can now be done on line, either as a repeat prescription or a consultation that might be weeks ahead, if you are in luck?
I appreciate that with the current crisis in GP provision nationwide, the person in the surgery room is steadily "vanishing" or being diminished at a further remove thanks to the convenience of heath care technology (HCT) and its all-pervasiveness. The voice behind the screen.
Consider the general hospital should you be admitted. Especially here the case is altered. What used to be envisaged as humanist care, where high touch and low tech meant that nursing the patient was the norm, now the equation is reversed, and high tech and low touch has become more commonplace. Devices such as monitor machines and intravenous tubes proliferate (HCT) whilst the nurse is now a technician "nursing" the machine, rarely the patient.
My point is that my identity as a patient with a lung complaint, such as with bronchiectasis is now more subject to a technological response, be it the GP surgery at one end of the treatment line or be it the hospital sojourn at the other end. Even with inhaled drugs all is a daily reminder of our subjugation to the chemical "fix"of heath care technology. So, what is going on here? I am sorry to have gone on at length but should we be worried?