Finally got an explanation as to why my DCFPyl PET scan was reported as radical prostatectomy and not a prior RT . My GP called the radiology lab (in my presence) and got another Radiologist to review the scans. He confirmed the 4 'uptakes' and said he could understand the initial radiologist interpretation in that the prostate was small and charred with no uptake [charred is my memory of the description]. On reviewing the historic correspondence, my GP said he saw my initial treatment was called 'radical radiation therapy' and assumes the radiologist "misread". Not entirely convinced with the explanation but happy it was reviewed by a 2nd radiologist.
Am curious as to how there could be no uptake in the prostate but were 4 nodes in the iliac region, 8 years after the RT/ADT treatment.