pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/352...
There must be more to this but can't figure out how to expand it.
Hisham F Bahmad 1, Timothy Demus 2, Maya M Moubarak 3 4, Darine Daher 5, Juan Carlos Alvarez Moreno 1, Francesca Polit 1, Olga Lopez 6, Ali Merhe 7, Wassim Abou-Kheir 3, Alan M Nieder 2 6, Robert Poppiti 1 6, Yumna Omarzai 1 6
Affiliations expand
PMID: 35225948 PMCID: PMC8883996 DOI: 10.3390/medsci10010015
Free PMC article
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer in men. Common treatments include active surveillance, surgery, or radiation. Androgen deprivation therapy and chemotherapy are usually reserved for advanced disease or biochemical recurrence, such as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), but they are not considered curative because PCa cells eventually develop drug resistance. The latter is achieved through various cellular mechanisms that ultimately circumvent the pharmaceutical's mode of action. The need for novel therapeutic approaches is necessary under these circumstances. An alternative way to treat PCa is by repurposing of existing drugs that were initially intended for other conditions. By extrapolating the effects of previously approved drugs to the intracellular processes of PCa, treatment options will expand. In addition, drug repurposing is cost-effective and efficient because it utilizes drugs that have already demonstrated safety and efficacy. This review catalogues the drugs that can be repurposed for PCa in preclinical studies as well as clinical trials.
Keywords: CRPC; androgen-deprivation therapy; drug repurposing; prostate cancer.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 1 Clinical diagnosis, patient stratification, and…
Figure 2
Figure 2 Drug repurposing in advanced prostate…
References
Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Fuchs H.E., Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022;72:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. - DOI - PubMed
Stamey T.A., Donaldson A.N., Yemoto C.E., McNeal J.E., Sözen S., Gill H. Histological and clinical findings in 896 consecutive prostates treated only with radical retropubic prostatectomy: Epidemiologic significance of annual changes. J. Urol. 1998;160:2412–2417. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62201-8. - DOI - PubMed
Al-Hussain T., Carter H.B., Epstein J.I. Significance of prostate adenocarcinoma perineural invasion on biopsy in patients who are otherwise candidates for active surveillance. J. Urol. 2011;186:470–473. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.119. - DOI - PubMed
Rakic N., Jamil M., Keeley J., Sood A., Vetterlein M., Dalela D., Arora S., Modonutti D., Bronkema C., Novara G., et al. Evaluation of lymphovascular invasion as a prognostic predictor of overall survival after radical prostatectomy. Urol. Oncol. 2021;39:495.e1–495.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.007. - DOI - PubMed
Harada M., Iida M., Yamaguchi M., Shida K. Analysis of bone metastasis of prostatic adenocarcinoma in 137 autopsy cases. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1992;324:173–182. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-3398-6_18. - DOI - PubMed
Show all 267 references
Publication types
Review
Related information
MedGen
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Europe PubMed Central
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
PubMed Central