ADT failure and measuring testosterone

I know at least one man who "failed" ADT (Lupron) and was thought to be "castration resistant". In fact however, when he got his testosterone measured it was 87 when the target number for his ADT treatment was 20. So he wasn't castration resistant at all. His problem was that the Lupron wasn't doing the job of bringing down his T level. When he added Casodex his PSA came down again.

I recommend that everyone on ADT get their testosterone level tested along with their PSA. Make sure that the drugs you're taking are doing what you want them to do.

Alan

40 Replies

oldestnewest
  • In the eyes of many oncologists, we are lemmings willing to follow them off the cliff using the blind faith protocol of western medicine.

  • I'm surprised to hear that isn't standard procedure. At Kaiser Hospital in Oakland, ever since my diagnosis 14 years ago, I get a T test every time I get a PSA test.

  • IMO it is malpractice not to. I have monthly T, DHT, PSA.

  • I'm up to monthly on T & PSA. Guess I'd better ask about DHT.

  • That's normal procedure !

  • Do you see a private med onc or what? I asked my Kaiser med onc about getting DHT testing & he asked what clinical trial findings establish a survival benefit in doing that. Anything you could tell me or find out for me about why not providing DHT is wrong would be very gratefully appreciated!

    Thank you.

    Neal

  • My message above is especially for bldn 10, but also for Break 60. Big thanks for whatever either or both of you can provide.

    Neal

  • I thought that DHT was created inside the prostate cell by 5a-reductase, on (free) testosterone. Would a blood test for DHT reflect what is going on within the cell?

  • That's an interesting question.

    As pure speculation, based on no knowledge whatsoever, I wouldn't be surprised if the people who recommend monitoring DHT aren't trying to correlate DHT levels inside and outside the cell, but rather with signs (e.g., PSA) of the magnitude of prostate cancer. All other things being equal, if blood level PSA goes up when blood level DHT goes up, and PSA goes down when DHT goes down, then it would appear to be desirable to hold DHT down. PSA might well go up even when DHT is low, which might mean that the cancer is not, or is no longer, dependent on higher levels of DHT. But, following your idea, it could also mean that there is too much DHT inside the tumor cells even though it's low in the blood.

    Alan

  • Wow, 14 years and still going strong. I'd like to hear your journey sometime in the future. Congratulations.

  • Thanks, Motosue. My doctor never told me about PSA tests. My next doctor, who said my DRE was abnormal, was aghast. My first PSA score was 60.7. I was 61.

    A friend sent me an article recommending against eating meat, fowl & dairy.

    RP, rising PSA in a few months. Gleason 3+4. EBRP with Lupron, same.

    I saw an integrative medicine oncologist, Donald Abrams, who recommended avoiding sugar (except in fruit) & stuff like bread that quickly converts to sugar. He recommended taking certain supplements. He had me see an acupunturist-herbalist. She recommended alternating acupuncture 1 week with massage the other week, to stimulate the immune system. She also recommended personalized prescription Chinese herbs. I follow this advice pretty closely, most of the time.

    I've been on continuous Lupron for 10 years. They weren't recommending any early chemo back then. When Lupron wasn't enough, Casodex was added until it failed. And now Zytiga for over 2 1/2 years. It took my PSA down from 160 to 13. After it started going up again, I started taking Metformin, which caused a dip for a little while. Now it's up to 47, & I'm taking the Zytiga closer to meals, with continued liver function monitoring, of course, every 30 days.

    A really bad thing happened in Sep. 2011: a spinal cord compression from a PCa tumor. Had to learn to walk again. Wheelchair to walker to crutches used as walking sticks to walking unaided, but not as well as before. For 3 different reasons, I wrecked a knee, then another (no replacements), & then an ankle. I lost my 3-point shot & much of my game.

    That's my story. If I had it to do over, I'd try Patrick O'Shea's method. But I didn't know of any alternative to what Kaiser uro's & med onc's suggested, other than adding the integrative medicine stuff, which Kaiser isn't paying for.

    Hope you're doing well.

    Neal

  • I hope I can reach those many years as you did. Keep plugging away.

    Good luck in your journey. Thanks for your history.

    motosue

  • You're welcome, motosue. I hope you can keep plugging away for even more years!

    Where are you? Have you had the opportunity to consult with 1 of the top med onc's?

  • I'm in Hawaii. Where are you living?

    One of my oncologist is Dr. Mark Scholtz in California and I did go to see Dr. Charles Myers from Virginia. I haven't seen Dr. Myers for a couple of years however. Perhaps when my PSA starts to move up I'll make an appointment with him again.

  • Wow, TWO of the top oncologists! Smart guy! I just applied for an app't with Mark Scholz. I saw him & Myers at the PCRI conference. Chuck Maack & I were emailing & he told me to go to the conference & that Scholz was the best guy in the West.

    I'm in San Leandro, right outside Oakland.

  • Dr.Scholu is really great and you won't regret it. Nowadays I just have phone consultations with him so I don't have to fly up to Marina Del Ray to see him. I just send him all my reports that I get done that he or my local oncologist wants done. Believe me , you'll be in good if not the best hands possible. By the way, I hope Chuck is doing great. I haven't seen any of his posts here. Take care and the best of health to you.

    Wilfred

  • Thanks very much for the comments, Wilfred. I haven't heard from Chuck. Last I knew, he was taking care of his wife & was having health problems himself. I sure wish him all the best.

    Neal

  • Dr Myers is in the process of closing his patient care.

  • Do you measure your glucose levels (or A1C). Diabetes should be prevented. No sugar, no simple carbs, but I feel that metfomin should be advocated. The Stampede trial, arm K, is now testing this, but it may be years before results from that arm are available. Also statins to reduce cholesterol blood levels. Cholesterol is a raw material in the synthesis of DHT and testosterone within the prostate cell itself.

    Long term Lupron has its own side-effects, as you probably know.

  • Alan, you don't mention what his PSA was when his T was at 87.

    Lupron failed me too. But, I only had my current PSA's, which were doubling quickly. Zytiga was added, my PSA dropped from 29 to 1.1 almost overnight. I have my T checked twice a year, and always at 0. And, that's about exactly how I feel.

  • The case I'm referring to happened over a decade ago. I don't remember what the fellow's PSA level was but I do know that his PSA had begun to rise in spite of being on continuous Lupron, and I also know that he was still alive and with his cancer under control when I last heard from him a few months ago.

    I don't know if this is related or not, but the guy was about 6 feet 6 and near 300 pounds. I wondered if the standard Lupron dose was insufficient for such a big man.

    Alan

  • Alan,

    I believe that Dr. Myers would say, that if only one test were to be done, it should be DHT rather than T. Gets to the heart of what drives AR growth.

    -Patrick

  • I definitely have to ask my Kaiser med onc about that.

  • yes, I agree, I must ask my doctor to take my testosterone tested every time I check my PSA. Sometimes I have to push him to do it cause he says, "Nah you don't need to do it". I wonder which test is more sensitive as a sign that the cancer is coming back - the Testosterone level or PSA. Hmmmmmm . Perhaps they both might move up the same time. I don't know. I'll ask my doctor today when I go in and see him from his experience.

  • Sadly, there remain multiple levels of dis-concern, no casodex, no avodart, no T measure, DHT? Huh? Admittedly, it doesn't or won't matter in many cases, but the others???? And they get po'd when we question them.

    Switching: I continue to have a problem with my urologist making me come back on another day for my Lupron shot. Please, anyone out there, on Lupron, who is forced to make second visits, please let me know and why if you know. Yes, I'm planning to move on.

    herb s.

  • It probably is caused by the insurance company or Medicare not paying for the shot if it is too soon (by their standards) after the previous injection. There are little, circular, paper calculators that the insurance companies distribute to the doctors offices that are used by the staff to determine when to schedule injections of Lupron. The research may say every x weeks, but the insurance companies say every y months. Over time the slight difference in the number of days in a month adds up to a shift off of the doctor visit schedule of every x weeks and saves the insurance companies money.

    In my experience, trying to insist on the research standard x weeks was a losing battle as the scheduler called in the business manager and the "bouncer" male nurse to intimidate us verbally and physically. My guess is that they didn't want to lose their kick-back.

  • GAD, thanks for response. Yes, that was the first thing 'we' looked at. NOT it. The problem seemed to be that the doc's office failed to add a defining term to the code based on the response to a formal Appeal I filed with Medicare, and that was in under 30 days! I copied the doc, but no change. Interestingly, they do not charge extra for the two visits, the indicated doctor never makes an appearance, but does not charge. Now, if this urology group wants to do Lupron shots on specific days, that's their call, but don't blame Medicare. AND when it extends my 84 day shot to 97, it's bad medicine imo, and when you lie to me, that destroys credibility-totally. An option might be to schedule the shot at 91 days (common std), and do the office visit blessing the shot (or not) a few days earlier. But that would take intelligence and initiative on the part of the Group's doctors and billing people--so it ain't gonna happen!

    herb

  • Herb,

    They didn't get preauthorization from the insurance; so that,payment will be made. They should have done it before your injection appointment.

    I agree, why do I have to have a hassle when I want my PSA test to include my Testosterone and DHT tests?

    Rich

  • Rich, I don't think so. Lupron doesn't require preauthorization. I appealed, Medicare explained nicely what doc has to do to get paid for shot (put a subcode). But it's just not happening. Apparently there are other issues with this urology monopoly that might fall under the cover of "insurance". Still haven't found another doc out of the group that I'm happy with.

    herb

  • Herb,

    I believe you. They told me I had to wait for the insurance to OK the injection. I went back a couple of days later.

    Rich

  • It looks like I'm behind the times here and a lot of men are being routinely tested for testosterone and, even better, DHT (dihydrotestosterone). That's good news. I think that anyone on ADT who is not getting these tests done should ask for them.

    My understanding is that castrate T levels used to be thought of as < 50 ng/dl but are now thought to be <20ng/dl, while Zytiga and Firmagon can get levels even lower. I don't know what the target levels for DHT are. Perhaps Patrick can post that?

    Alan

  • In eight years my husband had six testosterone tests. They were all <20ng/dl, most <10.

  • To follow what Alan, has written--I am late to comment. But for sure check every month. Some Doctors will not. My Doctor considers my situation while on ADT plus the 5-alpha reductase's I take to be continually on active surveillance. A term usually used for someone with a Gleason of 3+3--and having their prostate intact. My next blood draw is in 5 days I already started praying.

    Nalakrats

  • Nalakrats,

    What is the daily dosage of Casodex you are on?

    Rich

  • 50 mgs, and I have a Lupron Implant in my arm called Vantas--good for a year. Upon Biochemical failure, some Oncologists will up the Casodex to 150, and do quick 30 day PSA's.

    Nalakrats

  • Snuffy Myers is my med-onc for the time being and he is very supportive of the independent lab industry. :-) Its only logical that if you are on a 5a-reductase inhibitor [reduces DHT] then you want to know if it is working in order to be at the right dosage. But monthly is probably overkill once the target level [Myers=<5] has been reached. While on Avodart mine was usually around 2.

  • I know this is an old post, but I'd like to comment based on what I've been reading. Research has been done that shows the lower your T levels, the longer you go to CRPC. I'm not sure about the other hormones, but I read that Lupron does not guarantee testosterone levels of less than 50. You really need to be consistently below 20 if you want the best chance for the longest time to resistance. They say the first 6 months is the most important time. I know it's permanent and less popular, but surgical castration gives you consistent levels of T around 15.

  • Looking this up, I found an article that exactly corroborates everything you said:

    nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/N...

    It's my understanding that the more advanced ADT drugs - Xtandi, Zytiga, and Firmagon, all get testosterone levels well below 20, but also have more bothersome side effects than Lupron/Zoladex/Eligard. Doctors often take the view that they'll give the patient the drug that's easier to take and, if/when it fails, move on to something stronger. However, as you said, overall survival suffers.

    Alan

  • My understanding is Firmagon is an LHRH antagonist which does reduce testosterone levels, but Xtandi and Zytiga don't reduce the testosterone produced by the testicles. The last 2 are generally used as second line ADT treatments for CRPC patients. Unless you are surgically castrated, you still need the LHRH antagonist Firmagon or an LHRH agonist such as Lupron to keep T levels low. Here's where I got the information.

    cancer.org/cancer/prostate-...

  • Perhaps to clarify? Xtandi blocks Androgen Receptors, regardless of where or how much residual Testosterone androgen has already been made and may still be available, from whatever source, including, of course, the testicles. Zytiga, as a CYP17 blocker, actually does interfere with the production of any residual androgen/Testosterone, itself, regardless of the source, e.g. from the Adrenal Glands, or elsewhere.

    '

You may also like...