TSH problems in diagnosis: This paper highlights... - Thyroid UK

Thyroid UK

142,311 members167,676 posts

TSH problems in diagnosis

diogenes profile image
diogenesRemembering
6 Replies

This paper highlights the problems of using TSH in diagnosis.

Hindawi Journal of yroid Research

Volume 2019, Article ID 4106816, 8 pages

doi.org/10.1155/2019/4106816

Review Article Challenges in Interpreting Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Results in the Diagnosis of Thyroid Dysfunction

Salman Razvi Sindeep Bhana, 2 and Sanaa Mrabeti3

Thyrotropin (TSH), is regarded as the primary biomarker for evaluating thyroid function and is useful in guiding treatment with levothyroxine for patients with hypothyroidism. (e amplified response of TSH to slight changes in thyroid hormone levels provides a large and easily measured signal in the routine care setting. Laboratories provide reference ranges with upper and lower cutoffs for TSH to define normal thyroid function. (e upper limit of the range, used to diagnose subclinical (mild) hypothyroidism, is itself a matter for debate, with authoritative guidelines recommending treatment to within the lower half of the range. Concomitant diseases, medications, supplements, age, gender, ethnicity, iodine status, time of day, time of year, autoantibodies, heterophilic antibodies, smoking, and other factors influence the level of TSH, or the performance of current TSH assays. (e long-term prognostic implications of small deviations of TSH from the reference range are unclear. Correction of TSH to within the reference range does not always bring thyroid and other biomarkers into range and will not always resolve the patient’s symptoms. Overt hypothyroidism requires intervention with levothyroxine. It remains important that physicians managing a patient with symptoms suggestive of thyroid disease consider all of the patient’s relevant disease, lifestyle, and other factors before intervening on the basis of a marginally raised TSH level alone. Finally, these limitations of TSH testing mitigate against screening the population for the undoubtedly substantial prevalence of undiagnosed thyroid disease, until appropriately designed randomised trials have quantified the benefits and harms from this approach.

Written by
diogenes profile image
diogenes
Remembering
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
6 Replies
1tuppence profile image
1tuppence

Thank you, diogenes.

TorcHouse profile image
TorcHouse

Thanks for this, and it will be useful ammunition.

I love the bit at the end, about not initiating mass screening. Like the PSA blood test for male prostate problems, it could still be a flag for further watching, or even - shock-horror - testing the full thyroid panel.

diogenes profile image
diogenesRemembering

One of the ironies I find here is that TSH as a diagnostic aid is queried in this instance, yet once treatment is started on T4, it suddenly converts to being indispensable in controlling thyroid disease. This isn't logical: problems in one situation don't extrapolate to perfection in another. This attitude is cherrypicking. And the reason is as always: emerging hypothyroidism cannot be described as a medical fault, but treatment falls under guidelines or"forced-lines" where a false sense of certainty comes about by anxiety of litigation and thus defensive praise of TSH as a perfect diagnostic test in therapy. This for me is why TSH is being tenaciously held onto; it is a shieldwall against what is seen as illegitimate complaint.

Noelnoel profile image
Noelnoel in reply todiogenes

“Finally, these limitations of TSH testing mitigate against screening the population for the undoubtedly substantial prevalence of undiagnosed thyroid disease”

So to simplify/clarify: Is this paragraph saying that large numbers of us are walking around undiagnosed but that TSH testing isn’t a reliable diagnostic tool

shaws profile image
shaws

Diogenes - the GP who phoned to inform me that I had no problems at all and that was when the TSH was 100, so I am sure that few actually have know what a TSH indicates and they are unaware of how they should respond if TSH is too low or too high.

tattybogle profile image
tattybogle

Thanks for posting this... i first read it when i was still a lurker on here and was just starting to realise the emporer had no clothes on.

It's nice to re-read it now though ~ understanding it is much easier than it was the first time round .

( and it was my first introduction to the existence of human-anti-mouse-antibodies .. which still make me laugh)

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

my List of References recommending GP's keep TSH lower in range : feel free to add any others you have in replies.

These references all recommend GP's keep TSH between 0.4/ 0.5 and 2/2.5 in patients on levo. Some...
tattybogle profile image

BTA members say An over-reliance on TSH as a sole marker of wellbeing reduced opportunities for clinicians to address patient symptoms.

Patients’ attitudes and perceptions towards treatment of hypothyroidism in general practice: an...

A Review of the Clinical Consequences of Variation in Thyroid Function Within the Reference Range

This is, potentially, a VERY important review paper. Even if you ignore the rest, read the...
helvella profile image
Administrator

On blood tests in general and TSH test in particular

Hi there! In case this is of interest… here are a few links about blood tests in general and...
Chiquitita profile image

First steps in thyroid diagnosis/treatment

Additionally to my attempts regarding therapy, I've tried to make a corresponding document for the...
diogenes profile image
Remembering