It's my understanding that an increase in PSA post radiation is an indicator of recurrence. The PSA "cut score" is 2.0. Anyone know why 2.0 is considered a recurrence metric? Typically, what happens next? Treatment options? Indicators of success?
Many thanks,
EdinBaltimore
Written by
EdinBmore
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Your understanding is partially correct. Rising PSA post-radiation and Lupron is expected and is NOT an indicator of recurrence. When PSA reaches 2.0 over its lowest value, it indicates a "biochemical recurrence." Then they have to figure out if that is just from your PSA jumping around (remember, urinary retention causes PSA to rise) or if the cancer is causing it. If the cancer is causing it, it is called a "clinical recurrence." They will do a pelvic MRI and a full-body PET scan to hunt for any metastases.
Nadir+2.0 is used for "biochemical recurrence" after radiation because PSA tends to jump around a lot. This is especially true as T recovers. They found that PSA numbers below 2.0 were NOT well correlated with clinical recurrence.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.