prostate cancer 3+4: I was diagnosed... - Prostate Cancer N...

Prostate Cancer Network

5,267 members3,338 posts

prostate cancer 3+4

renegade70 profile image
34 Replies

I was diagnosed with prostate cancer approx. 2 and 1/2 years ago. I was 68 years old at the time, and as the result of a physical exam, I was given a PSA test. The result was a 4. Three months later another PSA test showed results over 5. Within eight months it went up 9.

I was then given a 12-core needle biopsy. The results showed one 3+3 =6 cancerous core (33%). I was placed on active surveillance Since then I have had two MRIs showing nothing whatsoever although my PSA level rose up to 10.

Three weeks ago I had a second 12 core needle biopsy. This time my results showed four cores 3+3=6 and one core 3+4=7 ( under 10%). Initially, my urologist told me it was safe to remain on active surveillance, however, when I went into his office to discuss the biopsy results he told me he was very much on the fence about things and wanted me to visit a radiation oncologist. He said he wanted to get the oncologist's opinion. I checked out the oncologist and he has nothing but 5-star ratings.

I am aware enough to know that if sent to a radiation oncologist you will more than likely be encouraged to be treated with radiation.

I am 71 years old. I do not know of any blood relatives who have had prostate cancer although my Father and paternal Grandfather died in their 60s.

I would appreciate any related comments or recommendations.

Written by
renegade70 profile image
renegade70
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
34 Replies
pjd55d profile image
pjd55d

get the opinion - accept treatment if and when you and your Urologist - and now Oncologist - feel that it is the appropriate action

Bruins11 profile image
Bruins11 in reply topjd55d

I was 72 when I had my RP. My Gleason was 3/4-7. Surgery was successful, as my PSA ever since has been .001, that’s the good news. I’ve had ED and stress incontinence since the RP, that’s the bad news. I would strongly suggest that you seriously consider RT for your treatment . I ge have several friends that have done that instead of surgury and they are all fine with little or no negative side effects.

Good luck!!

Lieto55 profile image
Lieto55 in reply toBruins11

Boy howdy, great advice here. My 3+4 biopsy happened at 65. After surgery, exactly same symptoms. Really life altering. Recurred and went radiation and ADT route two years later.Depending on aggressiveness (Decipher, etal) (mine was in the 60s), I would go ADT and radiation, realizing that no surgery can happen after radiation.

I was never on a watch/wait program, but it seems like waiting should have ended after the first 3+3 and PSA growth. My PSA was slow and only at surgery did it hit 4+, but it had already become meta (recurrence wasn't in local area, T11 very and pelvic lymph glands.)

ADT isn't fun but ain't as bad as I imagined up front.

Good luck on all fronts!

renegade70 profile image
renegade70 in reply toLieto55

thank you

renegade70 profile image
renegade70 in reply toLieto55

i was told that 3+3=6 does not ever spread.

Lieto55 profile image
Lieto55 in reply torenegade70

? That's just crazy. How would one know? At 3+4 on 12 cores, my cancer had already metastisized. At surgery, the margins were clear, no infiltration to surrounding tissues, seminal vesicles removed along with selected nearby lymph nodes, and apparently the bilateral erectile nerves (@#$_-;). PSA never went to absolute zero (.01-.02), and at two years it started migrating up with a defined doubling frequency. So the takeaway is that you can have cellular migrations, I believe, at anytime. Mine went all the way to T11 vertibrate while my PSA was at .1. "Never" just isn't a word I have in my vocabulary, "cure" neither. Delay? Sure. Never just sounds arrogant, like they actually know. It's a probability game. As someone smarter than me said on this board, you are speaking with the survivors (so far). Those with more aggressive cases left us before we heard their story. So it's a biased field. I'd be more aggressive if I could do it again. Radiation and ADT immediately, surgery...pfft. IMHO.

Good luck!!

renegade70 profile image
renegade70 in reply toBruins11

thank you

renegade70 profile image
renegade70 in reply topjd55d

thank you

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

Ask for a Decipher test of your last biopsy.

renegade70 profile image
renegade70 in reply toTall_Allen

Excuse my stupidity but what is a decipher test? Thanks for responding.

conbio profile image
conbio in reply torenegade70

The Decipher Prostate Genomic Classifier is a genetic test that helps doctors determine the risk of prostate cancer spreading and the likelihood of a patient benefiting from hormone therapy

renegade70 profile image
renegade70 in reply toconbio

thank you

Ianrs profile image
Ianrs

Get radiation. The process itself is simple, but you may not feel well after a few rounds and that could last several months without being debilitating. But best to be precautious. I had 6 weekly of 6 gyes.

renegade70 profile image
renegade70 in reply toIanrs

thanks much

mchale profile image
mchale in reply torenegade70

I just finished my second SBRT treatment today, yesterday was the first, tomorrow is my third...MRI guided Linac Electra Unity , two more next week....just got back from the gym 3 hour workout.

renegade70 profile image
renegade70 in reply tomchale

thanks much, but a 3 hour workout is beyond my capacity being close to 72.

aceace12 profile image
aceace12

good luck

renegade70 profile image
renegade70 in reply toaceace12

thanks much

CrackerOcala profile image
CrackerOcala

Certainly get that 2nd opinion but it does sound like your signposts are moving in the wrong direction. I had my cores submitted for Prolaris testing, similar to Decipher. Even though I had some 4+3 cores. I was borderline for hormone therapy. After research to my satisfaction I steered clear of that option (although doc preferred to do it, he acknowledged that the need was not overriding). Seemed to be more downside to surgery. Ended up going with radiation , that ended this past July. Keep us posted. Best wishes.

renegade70 profile image
renegade70 in reply toCrackerOcala

thank you

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n

The soup of the day:

"RT" in prostate cancer stands for Radiation Therapy which is a common treatment method used to kill prostate cancer cells by delivering high-energy rays to the tumor, often administered through external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or internal radiation therapy (brachytherapy) depending on the stage of the cancer; it can be used as a primary treatment option or as an adjuvant therapy after surgery for high-risk prostate cancer.

Greetings, Our support is with you...

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n

renegade70 profile image
renegade70 in reply toj-o-h-n

thanks much

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n in reply torenegade70

You're welcome,

In the good ole days, surgery was the way to go, now it seem that radiation is best. Keep researching and asking for information here and elsewhere.

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n

paladin7 profile image
paladin7

I got opinions from a second urologist and a second oncologist, for a total of four opinions. I also listened carefully to the excellent folks who comment in this HealthUnlocked community.

All of these helped me reach a decision that I was satisfied with, and that's very important to me.

So I encourage you to take the time to get as many opinions as you need to be able to reach a decision that you are at peace with.

renegade70 profile image
renegade70 in reply topaladin7

thanks much

renegade70 profile image
renegade70 in reply topaladin7

thanks much

janebob99 profile image
janebob99

I highly recommend doing SBRT radiation treatment. It's only 5 sessions of X-ray treatment, and is very effective at reducing PSA. I had very few side effects from the treatment and they were very minor.

MrOz profile image
MrOz

I had these exact same numbers except I was 57. I had my prostate removed, 2-years later with rising PSA, I had 45 course of radiation. I am now 68. I have never been to zero for PSA. My PSA continues to rise. I've had two PET scans , one year apart, last one 3-months ago. No cancer has been found. Last visit PSA was 1.45. Looks like hormone treatment is coming. Possibly in March. All you can do is trust your doctors and scour the Internet for information. I have been using AI to ask questions. You can't actually trust that completely but AI sends back info that you can corroborate at other places but you still get interesting info. For example I learned a guy lived 35 years on hormones. (sidebar- he was also castrated right at the beginning.) A question one has to ask himself, how long do you think you would have lived if this disease didn't show up. Is the patient healthy, weight under control, longevity in family members, all those things? Treatment is a slog and my experience, you'll never be same physically. But if think you got years ahead of you, get treated. Good luck friend...

It’s worthwhile to get a second opinion on your biopsy samples .

We had my husband’s bladder and prostate cancer biopsy samples sent to Johns Hopkins for second opinions.

Getting an accurate Gleason score helps in designing the best treatment plan for your prostate cancer.

renegade70 profile image
renegade70 in reply toCancerConcierge

I am scheduled for a 2nd opinion at Massachusetts General Hospital's Prostate Cancer Treatment Center. Mass General is one of the best hospitals in the country. So most likely I will go with the treatment they prescribe.

Androgel123 profile image
Androgel123

My friend. I think you have nothing to worry about. For sure you’ll die from something else, you’re 71 and prostate cancer is SLOW growing. If I were you I’d enjoy the rest of my life and not even worry about it. They play on your fears you know, to guide you towards treatment. The system is geared that way to make money.

renegade70 profile image
renegade70 in reply toAndrogel123

thank you

renegade70 profile image
renegade70 in reply toAndrogel123

thank you so much.

renegade70 profile image
renegade70

so many differing opinions. just like the doctors.. guess i have to make my own decisions. this is a disease very different from most others. i truly appreciate everyone's viewpoint but basically it is my decision without any particular way to go except what i decide.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

55 and prostate cancer - Scared shitless

Hi, at the beginning of last year my PSA jumped from 2.1 to 3.6 - with a family history (father,...
ianvnqld6 profile image

Any experience with Intraductal Cancer?

Not sure how this works. Hopefully you can read my profile to see where I'm at. If not, I repeat...
SherpaT profile image

Just getting started

Hello - My story starts with a PSA at 13.8 [Jan 2019], up from 4.2 [May 2016]. It was retested at...
Benz_16 profile image

Trying to decide Active Surveillance vs other options

I'm new to this site and am looking for feedback on active surveillance vs radiation. I'm 57 years...
cost1962 profile image

Gleason score change from 3+4 to 3+3 with perineural invasion noted under Active Surveillance

I recently had an MRI and PSA about 11 months into Active Surveillance. The MRI showed no change &...
allshallbewell profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.