Psma-pet scan results: PCa Warriors: I... - Prostate Cancer N...

Prostate Cancer Network

5,259 members3,325 posts

Psma-pet scan results

witantric profile image
13 Replies

PCa Warriors:

I am on Active Surveillance(AS )with one core GL6 at 10%. I am part of a clinical trial that uses PSMA-pet scan to track progression. I guess the goal is to catch progression early and maybe avoid biopsies. The results are given below.

Two things grabbed my attention from the report.

Hepatobiliary: No abnormal uptake. A few cysts. Gallstones in an otherwise unremarkable gallbladder.

Pelvic organs: Prostatomegaly with BPH. No suspicious uptake. Uptake midline posterior transition zone correlates with urinary excreted radiotracer within the prostatic urethra.

Thoughts? What the heck is Prostatomegaly?

Should I be worried about the "few cysts"?

Keep fighting.

Fellow warrior in WI

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Results

Impression

IMPRESSION:

No evidence of primary prostate cancer or metastatic disease.

Narrative

EXAM: PET MRI SKULL BASE TO THIGH

CLINICAL INFORMATION: 61 years old patient with newly diagnosed prostate cancer in the right apex, Gleason score 3+3. Patient is referred for further evaluation.

TECHNIQUE:

Radiopharmaceutical: 8.50 mCi of 18F-DCFPyL

Intravenous injection site: Left antecubital fossa

Uptake time: 60 minutes pelvis, 107 minutes body

Field of view: Skull base to mid-thighs

Intravenous contrast: gadobenate dimeglumine (Multihance) administered as part of concurrent dedicated regional MRI

Oral contrast: Not administered

MRI protocol: Same day MR pelvis with and without contrast

COMPARISON: MR pelvis 3/5/2024 and 10/31/2023.

FINDINGS:

Physiologic background liver standardized uptake value (SUV mean and SUV max) reported for comparison between PET studies: 8.5 and 11.5.

Visualized head/neck: Physiologic uptake of the lacrimal and salivary glands.

Head/neck lymph nodes: No suspicious head/neck lymph nodes.

Lungs: No lung nodules or abnormal uptake.

Pleura/pericardium: No pleural or pericardial effusion.

Thoracic lymph nodes: No suspicious thoracic lymph nodes.

Other chest findings: No abnormal uptake.

Hepatobiliary: No abnormal uptake. A few cysts. Gallstones in an otherwise unremarkable gallbladder.

Spleen: No abnormal uptake.

Pancreas: No abnormal uptake.

Adrenals: Within normal limits.

Kidneys/bladder: No abnormal uptake. Physiologically excreted tracer activity within the renal collecting system and urinary bladder.

Bowel/peritoneum: No suspicious bowel uptake or abnormality.

Pelvic organs: Prostatomegaly with BPH. No suspicious uptake. Uptake midline posterior transition zone correlates with urinary excreted radiotracer within the prostatic urethra.

Abdominopelvic lymph nodes: No suspicious lymph nodes.

Musculoskeletal/soft tissues/skin: No suspicious osseous lesions.

Other: None.

Written by
witantric profile image
witantric
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
13 Replies
Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

It just means your prostate is enlarged, which is what BPH is. Cysts are a common benign finding.

witantric profile image
witantric in reply toTall_Allen

Thanks Tall_Allen. I don't know why these reports don't put index of terms at the end. It will really help the patients.

pd63 profile image
pd63 in reply towitantric

What if it picked up something asymptomatic and serious but untreatable, does pet scan pick up such things as aneurysms, I'm no expert.Just think maybe sometimes best not to know!

witantric profile image
witantric in reply topd63

Good point! The person leading the study did warn me of that. She said that few patients in the study were diagnosed with something else (e.g. bladder cancer, and liver cancer,...) So, she did warn me of that in my pre interview. But you raise a fair point...

pd63 profile image
pd63 in reply towitantric

It's good if something treatable is found but nightmarish otherwise

witantric profile image
witantric in reply topd63

That is a fair point. The scan in the study was very extensive (full body and pelvis). The entire thing (injecting tracer, waiting, scans) took >4 hours. They have a lot of patients dropping out of the study. Maybe the duration of the entire procedure is one of them...

maley2711 profile image
maley2711 in reply towitantric

yes, these scan of all types find things that may alarm us. My lung nodules are stable.MRI found 2 hernias didn't know I have!!! Back/vertabral abnormalities, etc. Sister had a scan that ended up with her having an unpleasant endoscopy to check for bile duct cancer....threw a scare into her!!! an MRI done for something else reported a bile duct cyst...which are somewhat common evidently..

Mgtd profile image
Mgtd in reply towitantric

Simple. They are written by doctors for doctors.

Mcrpca profile image
Mcrpca

prostatomegaly means the prostate is large. Cysts are common a generally not a problem.

jethrotullag profile image
jethrotullag

Prostatomegaly = BPH. Redundant statement

TFU589 profile image
TFU589

witantric,

Unless I missed it in the earlier posts, but can you provide where this PSMA AS triali is being performed?

Interesting topic, found this article if anyone else wants to take a look. Hope that link works.

Expanding the role of PSMA PET in active surveillance

bmcurol.biomedcentral.com/a...

witantric profile image
witantric in reply toTFU589

My clinical trial was in Madison, WI with UW health. I think it is this one:

urology.wisc.edu/blog/2023/...

Feel free to message me. I can tell you my experience. Since they combine the PSMA-PET Scan and normal mri scan, the process is actually quite long.

TFU589 profile image
TFU589

Thank you for the information, I will contact you if I think I might be interested.

Looks like they are using a new "radiotracer called Pylarify".(F-DCFPyL).

They used that one, and another one in the study that I posted.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

PSMA PET

I am 60 years old, PSA 6.03 and diagnosed with PC after a TRUS biopsy January 22. The biopsy...

2nd Opinion downgraded 4+3 60%4’s to 3+4 30% 4’s from MD Anderson. Thoughts?

PSA 18.987 MRI: 32ml 4.5x3.6x3.7 9mm lesion, prostatitis of peripheral gland, BPH of Central...
bl2307 profile image

MRI from 3-30-2024.

I have been on active surveillance since 2016. Recently had a jump in PSA from 6.5 to 8.29. Had...
Odnad profile image

Opinions on my 2nd MRI results

Hello, I just received the results from 2nd MRI (results below and photos in reply), previous one...
Maximode profile image

Advice - Surgery or Radiation?

Hi all, apologies for the long post, hoping to give as much info as possible. Background:...
Blue1320 profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.