MRI from 3-30-2024.: I have been on... - Prostate Cancer N...

Prostate Cancer Network

5,258 members3,324 posts

MRI from 3-30-2024.

Odnad profile image
11 Replies

I have been on active surveillance since 2016. Recently had a jump in PSA from 6.5 to 8.29. Had an MRI on Saturday and here are the results. Any thoughts or input are greatly appreciated.

Impressions

--No significant interval change in appearance of the prostate, with stable size and imaging appearance of the lesion along the left posterior peripheral zone of the apex, likely corresponding to known prostate cancer. No evidence of extraprostatic extension.

--No new dominant suspicious prostatic lesion.

--No metastatic disease in the pelvis.

--Partially visualized aneurysmal dilatation of the infrarenal aorta measuring up to 3.7 cm. Recommend follow-up CTA abdomen and pelvis for further evaluation.

PI-RADSregistered v2.1 Assessment Categories

PI-RADS 1 - Very low (clinically significant cancer is highly unlikely to be present)

PI-RADS 2 - Low (clinically significant cancer is unlikely to be present)

PI-RADS 3 - Intermediate (the presence of clinically significant cancer is equivocal)

PI-RADS 4 - High (clinically significant cancer is likely to be present)

PI-RADS 5 - Very high (clinically significant cancer is highly likely to be present

Narrative

Exam: MRI of the Male Pelvis without and with Contrast

History: 60-year-old male with Gleason 3+3 prostate cancer (left base, mid gland, apex), followed with active surveillance. Most recent PSA of 8.29.

Technique: Breath-hold and non-breath-hold multiplanar assessment of the male pelvis was undertaken using external body surface coils to assess extraprostatic disease and stage the pelvis. T1, T2, gradient echo, and steady state images were created, with and/or without fat suppression, per standardized protocol to assess tissue characteristics. These included screening images to assess the abdominal retroperitoneum and regional osseous anatomy for metastatic disease. Multiparametric assessment of the prostate was undertaken with the application of multiplanar T2, diffusion, and dynamic perfusion series in an attempt to characterize intraprostatic disease distribution and volume. Image fusion analysis and semi-quantitative review was conducted using Dyna-CAD prostate imaging analysis software.

IV contrast: 9 mL of Gadavist.

Comparison: Prostate MRI 6/24/2022

FINDINGS:

QUALITY: Adequate.

HEMORRHAGE: No evidence of hemorrhage within the prostate.

PROSTATE SIZE: Prostate measures 5.0 x 3.8 x 4.0 cm, 39 mL.

PERIPHERAL ZONE: Scattered areas of heterogeneous T2 signal hypointensity which may reflect sequela of prostatitis or scarring.

Lesion 1:

Size: 1.3 cm (10:11, 7:15), grossly stable from prior.

Location: Left posterior peripheral zone of the apex

T2: Moderate ill-defined T2 hypointensity

DWI: Moderately increased DWI, moderately decreased ADC

DCE: Positive

Prostate margin: Does abut the prostate margin

Extracapsular Extension: None

TRANSITIONAL ZONE: Central gland enlargement with changes of benign prostatic hypertrophy.

SEMINAL VESICLES: Unremarkable. Seminal vesicles are symmetric in appearance.

NEUROVASCULAR BUNDLES: Unremarkable.

BLADDER: Urinary bladder is underdistended, limiting evaluation.

LYMPH NODES: No pathologic pelvic or inguinal adenopathy.

OTHER: No pelvic free fluid or drainable collection.

VESSELS: Vascular structures of the pelvis appear patent. Partially visualized aneurysmal dilatation of the infrarenal aorta just proximal to the bifurcation up to 3.7 cm with associated moderate atheromatous plaque.

LARGE FIELD-OF-VIEW: No findings of bowel obstruction on large field-of-view imaging.

BONES AND SOFT TISSUES: Heterogeneity of the sacral marrow, similar compared to prior. No suspicious enhancing marrow signal lesions.

Written by
Odnad profile image
Odnad
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
11 Replies
Odnad profile image
Odnad

They updated the MRI report as follows:

Addendum

The described lesion along the left posterior peripheral zone is categorized as PI-RADS 4 (3+1).

witantric profile image
witantric in reply toOdnad

But that lesion was already biopsied. Right?

Odnad profile image
Odnad in reply towitantric

No it was not.

witantric profile image
witantric in reply toOdnad

Oh, so the first biospy was not MRI guided?

Odnad profile image
Odnad in reply towitantric

Correct. I had a biopsy in Virginia in 2016, We moved to North Carolina in 2019. Had a biopsy in Jan 2019 with a new urologist. Had an MRI June of 2022 then this one.

witantric profile image
witantric in reply toOdnad

Oh ok. Hope your next biopsy is mri-guided.

Murk profile image
Murk

I would send your first and latest MRI results off to Hopkins, MSKC, Mayo, Anderson or any highly rated facility for a second opinion.

leach234 profile image
leach234

My radiologist told me MRI’s are inaccurate 25% of the time. When they say it’s contained it may not actually be contained. Especially if it’s abutting the margin as yours is. Just saying.

Aussieguy1 profile image
Aussieguy1

Partially visualized aneurysmal dilatation of the infrarenal aorta measuring up to 3.7 cm. Recommend follow-up CTA abdomen and pelvis for further evaluation.

Get this followed up, if it has not already been investigated discuss this finding with your Dr.

Muggs1 profile image
Muggs1

get another biopsy

Odnad profile image
Odnad

Thanks for all the responses and advice. Here are the results from my MRI guided biopsy (16 samples taken). Scheduling with Oncologist tomorrow.

A: Prostate, target, core biopsy

- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 (Grade group 2) involving 4 of 4 cores, approximately 6, 7, 8, and 6 mm in linear extent, approximately 80% of total core length (10% Gleason pattern 4).

- Perineural invasion is present.

B: Prostate, left apex, core biopsy

- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 (Grade group 2) involving 2 of 2 cores, approximately 6 and 5 mm in linear extent, approximately 90% of total core length. (Less than or equal to 5% Gleason pattern 4)

C: Prostate, left mid, core biopsy

- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 (Grade group 2) involving 3 of 3 cores, approximately 5, 4 and 1 mm in linear extent, approximately 30% of total core length (10% Gleason pattern 4).

- Suspicious for extraprostatic extension

D: Prostate, left base, core biopsy

- Prostatic adenocarcinoma, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade group 1) involving 1 of 2 cores, approximately 4 mm in linear extent, approximately 20% of total core length.

E: Prostate, right apex, core biopsy

- Benign prostate tissue

- Benign portion of seminal vesicle/ejaculatory duct

F: Prostate, right mid, core biopsy

- Benign prostate tissue

G: Prostate, right base, core biopsy

- Benign prostate tissue

The pattern 4 in this case demonstrates cribriform morphology.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Prostate MRI results - Advice appreciated

Hello Everyone, I would like to provide update and seek advice since I got a Prostate MRI at Johns...
nvidia-ati profile image

Question for the Brain Trust, what am I missing!

I want to thank everybody who replied to my earlier question regarding a treatment decision. I got...

Opinions on my 2nd MRI results

Hello, I just received the results from 2nd MRI (results below and photos in reply), previous one...
Maximode profile image

MRI results not promising ...need advice

I've been on AS for over a year after being diagnosed with low grade (Gleason 3+3) in Feb of 2016...
gordee09 profile image

What Do You Do When Your 2nd Opinion Is Different From Your First

what do you do when your second opinion is different from your first. i sent in a request for my...
Arthro92 profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.