I posted about a month ago and didn't get any responses. I think it might be because I didn't have much information in the Profile section. I've updated my profile and did the best I can to describe my story. I had HDR Brachytherapy in 2018 to treat prostate cancer. The specifics are now in my Profile. For the past 6 years my PSA has bounced around but mostly under 1.0. In June 2023, PSA was .86 but my Primary Physician noticed that it had elevated 3 times .29 to .35 to .86 in 3 years. She said we need to do the next PSA at 6 months rather than 1 year. It elevated again from .86 to 1.49 during the 6 month period. My Primary Physician recommended that I see a urologist. I saw the urologist in January of this year. We did another PSA mid January and it was 1.12. He recommended either doing another PSA in 3 months or an mpMRI now. I chose MRI and got the results today. I have a telemedicine appointment with the urologist at noon tomorrow. I want to be prepared. Here are the MRI findings:
Prostate: Calculated Volume 14.5 cc PSA density : 0.08, normal.
Gland description:
There is generalized hypointensity throughout the transition zone and peripheral zone, consistent with history of radiation therapy. Ferromagnetic artifact from radiation fiducial markers is noted. No significant restricted diffusion.
Seminal Vesicles: There is asymmetric restricted diffusion with contrast enhancement seen medially in the right seminal vesicle corresponding to axial T2-weighted image 19. The left seminal vesicle demonstrates T1-weighted precontrast hyperintensity consistent with proteinaceous fluid without restricted diffusion.
Bones: No suspicious lesions.
Unless otherwise recommended, the incidental findings identified above require no follow up imaging based on consensus recommendations.
IMPRESSION
Radiation changes are noted diffusely within the prostate gland as described above.
Asymmetric contrast enhancement with restricted diffusion seen medially in the right seminal vesicle is consistent with recurrent prostate carcinoma. PSMA PET/CT verses biopsy should be considered.
No lymphadenopathy or suspicious osseous lesions
PIRADS X: Post treatment
I don't understand the medical jargon in this report. I'm trying to figure out what to say to the urologist tomorrow. If it's true to form he will rush through the meeting. I would appreciate any comments or advise that anybody on this forum has to offer.