I very much appreciate all the kind words, support and advice I've recieved here on this forum. It has helped my journey. Here's a link to my original post:
healthunlocked.com/prostate...
I got a second opinion from John's Hopkins. I've included below an excerpt from the pathology results. Hopefullly, the pathologist that read my slides was trained by Dr. Epstein. It appears the original lab that created and read my biopsy slides only sent 2 of them to Hopkins. Is it normal for pathology labs to send just 2 slides instead off of all the slides from all the cores?
What do you advise my next steps should be? What serum and urine tests are available as advised by the Hopkins pathologist?
I also have an appointment to see another urologist at Hopkins: Dr. Arthur Louis Burnett who seems experienced.
SURGICAL PATHOLOGY: CONSULT - Details
Pathologist: Tamara Levin Lotan, MD
Specimen: Prostate:Needle Core Biopsy
UROLOGIC PATHOLOGY CONSULTATION SERVICE
1. Prostate (Needle Core Biopsy):
F. Prostate tissue with small focus of atypical glands, highly suspicious for low-grade carcinoma. See note.
NOTE: Although these findings are highly atypical and suspicious for adenocarcinoma, there is insufficient cytologic and/or architectural atypia to establish a definitive diagnosis. Followup is warranted with serum or urine tests and imaging, and in some cases, repeat biopsy with relative increased sampling of the atypical site may be recommended.
Stains for high molecular weight cytokeratin and p63 are positive in a patchy fashion in some of the glands.
This case was reviewed at the Genitourinary Pathology Quality Assurance conference.
Received 2 slides (F1-H&E, stain).