Finally , tests done and a consult. - Prostate Cancer N...

Prostate Cancer Network

5,260 members3,328 posts

Finally , tests done and a consult.

Chasbearcat999 profile image
6 Replies

Gleason 3+4. PSA 8. After MRI, biopsy and PSMA (clean), . I finally met with doctor. He seemed more interested in removal. I told him that was off of the table for me. He referred me to an RO, but I have a second consult set up Friday with Univ of Cincinnati. I was confused by his explanation when I asked him about the cribform. He stated it is more aggressive than "typical" Gleason 4. I asked then why it wasn't a Gleason 5 and he really seemed stumped. I could be wrong, but I told him that I had read a lot but obviously don't have an MD, but it seems from what I have read is that when cribform and intraductal are present is when it becomes more aggressive. He honestly seemed confused by the question, so maybe I was talking nonsense.

It has taken a ton of calls and emails, but Johns Hopkins does have my biopsy samples. One thing that he couldn't answer-He stated that I had a high number of positive cores. I had 5 of 15 cores positive. But it was a fusion biopsy, and 4 were taken directly from an 10mm lesion. I asked if that skewed the results, and he said no. Seems to me if they would have kept taking them only from the lesion, the percentage would be 100%. He didn't seem to follow my logic.

Anyway, he did refer me to an RO in addition to the consultation I had already scheduled. I also asked him about Cyberknife and he said that really only Gleason 6's were good candidates. That seemed to fly in the face of everything I have read. I expressed that to him, and he said "long term outcomes with 3+4 are not good with Cyberknife.

Written by
Chasbearcat999 profile image
Chasbearcat999
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
6 Replies
Jordache profile image
Jordache

I was Gleason 4 ….3+4 and 4+3 and a bit of 4+4. Cyber knife was not an option but then they did another fusion biopsy and down graded it to 4+3 and we’re willing to do it but was suspect to me and I have good insurance so I wondered if I would question my choice later on. I decide I wanted to be more aggressive in treatment so I wouldn’t regret it.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

Can you travel to Cleveland for a meeting with Daniel Spratt at UH Seidman Cancer Center? The RO you spoke to doesn't know shit.

Cribriform only adds a little to the risk of pattern 4. Gleason patterns are different.

1Ubspaine profile image
1Ubspaine

You sound like me in the early stages of my Prostate adventure. I fired my Urologist quickly as he was only interested in a quick removal. Once I got to UTSouthwestern, a teaching hospital in Dallas and visited with another Urologist and a talented unbiased R.O.-Dr. Garant(she was a very talented personable professional), I was confident to proceed with 5 radiation treatments.

Tall Allen is giving you great advice to get to Cincinnati to the best medical professionals.

Miko710 profile image
Miko710

I'm interested in your case, as our situations are quite similar. I have Gleason 7 (4+3) and some Gleason 8, Low PSA (7.0), cribriform, perineural invasion, no lymph node spread, confined to capsule (PMSA PET scan) I just finished 5 sessions SBRT (so basically Cyberknife) here in Montreal on Monday. Dealing with some urinary burning, which I feel/hope will pass. Asides: I'm also hoping that my BPH will be better with a shrunken prostate. My RO has me on 18 months ADT (Eligard). Not many SE (yet), two months in. Occasional hot flash. But I'm being really careful with diet and exercise, calcium/Vitamin D. Getting a bone density scan (osteoporosis is a potential ADT SE). Bu I'm glad that I chose SBRT.

Jordache profile image
Jordache in reply toMiko710

I was on elligard for 18 months and felt with the side effects. They were tolerable and wanted to follow Dr Zelesfki protocol to the T to know that I wouldn’t have to deal with what if later on. Some may feel it was overkill but I stayed the course. Good luck!

Miko710 profile image
Miko710

Thanks. This is reassuring. 18 months seems to be the recommended duration in many cases I had one urologist who suggested 12 months for my situation, but I'll see where I (and the science) is when I reach one year. I guess that the main concern is testosterone recovery, if and when.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Newly diagnosed and looking for advice....

I’m a newly diagnosed 64 year old, very good health, prostate volume of 32 cc, strong family...
Hiker64 profile image

Opinions requested – biopsy pathology report

I felt my biopsy pathology report was light on details: LT Anterior Base, Biopsy: Prostatic...
climb4blue profile image

Uro and Surgeon Recommending Focal Cryoablation

After confirming my pc diagnosis via biopsy was accurate, I have been looking at various...
rlafford profile image

Just diagnosed and a bit scared.

Just diagnosed in Feb of this year. Only 50. But dad had it and i am African American—-so risk is...
rf3rf3 profile image

6 Month Eligard

I got my results from PSA/PET last week, showing no metastatic activity anywhere, bones and lymph...
SherpaT profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.