Update with genomic testing - Prostate Cancer N...

Prostate Cancer Network

5,258 members3,325 posts

Update with genomic testing

LBRV711 profile image
22 Replies

Hi all,

Just want to give an update since you were all so wonderful after I posted last time.

One place I visited was NY Proton Center. They sent out for genomic testing and it came back as a .43. Dr. Hassan who runs the program there said technically it’s still not in the intermediate range, but the cutoff is .45. For that reason, since it is not a low number like a .2 or .3, he would recommend going forward now with treatment. The rest of my results are 5 core fragments out of 12 had cancer. Three had 5%, one had 10%, and one had 20%, gleason 6. The core fragments were multi centric. One of two lesions was abutting the wall. Capsule intact. I will also speak with NYU Langone again to see what they think as well. A lot of you felt I should be doing AS. Do you still feel that way now?

Thank you so much for your kind responses.

Written by
LBRV711 profile image
LBRV711
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
22 Replies
Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

As long as there is no pattern 4, why would you stop AS?

LBRV711 profile image
LBRV711 in reply toTall_Allen

I know. Both NY Proton and NYU Langone feel now is the time. Unfortunately, that is messing with my head.

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply toLBRV711

If you want a third opinion, I recommend Behfar Ehdaie at MSK. They have one of the best AS programs in the US, IMO.

LBRV711 profile image
LBRV711 in reply toTall_Allen

Thank you for that. I think I may do that.

FMOH_N profile image
FMOH_N

just wanted to mention that about 30% of biopsies are upgraded after RP. so there is a chance of more cancer or even existence of gleasson 4.

LBRV711 profile image
LBRV711 in reply toFMOH_N

I was thinking about that myself. It’s all very confusing. Options are normally great. I am grateful to have options, but presently not loving having to make a decision of this magnitude. Thank you for your reply. I appreciate it.

EJC61 profile image
EJC61

I had to reread your data. I had consecutive MRI's (8 mos apart the latter being a PET MR PSMA Gallium Scan) with a PiRad 4 abutting the capsule before I no longer felt comfortable without having that lesion biopsied. As you know, that was another story. What are the doctors' recommendations? They seem a bit all over the place. Seperately, have you inquired with your insurance provider whether Proton would be covered? I'd want more information on that lesion PIRad 3 abutting the wall.

LBRV711 profile image
LBRV711 in reply toEJC61

Hi again. Both NYU Langone and NY Proton Center are recommending doing it now instead of AS. I had two leasions. One PIRad 2 and the other a PIRad 3 that is abutting the wall. NY proton wanted to submit to insurance to see if they will pay, but I am leaning toward NYU Langone if I do this because Dr. Haas has been doing this for years and is highly regarded in NY, and due to the fact that it tracks the movement in real time which proton therapy does not. Although I know they say proton stops in its target. They do allow a 3% over target to make sure they get it all. NYU Langone said if they deny, they feel confident they can appeal and overturn it. Still leaning toward NYU Langone. Maybe because of comfort with doctor. Not sure.

maley2711 profile image
maley2711

Get the 3rd opinion from MSK !! What you need is some more data about AS success for men with your biopsy and scan results. Did you ask Langone for such data.? How else could you make an INFORMED decision? And how else should a provider make an informed recommendation??? Seat of pants??

LBRV711 profile image
LBRV711 in reply tomaley2711

I did set an appointment thanks to everyone on this site. Thank you!

EJC61 profile image
EJC61

I would push about the significance of the location of the PiRad 3 lesion. That's the primary factor for me. All the other data is a place I've been and was ok with AS.

KocoPr profile image
KocoPr in reply toEJC61

How long have you been on AS? Are you getting a biopsy once per year?

I felt uncomfortable with getting more than the original biopsy for cancer diagnosis because i just felt that pulling cancer cells through the intact prostate capsule.

EJC61 profile image
EJC61 in reply toKocoPr

I was on AS from 2017-2023. I had my first bx in 2017 and confirmatory bx in 2018. Unfortunately had SIRS episodes w/o inflection both times. It’s a long story. Anyway, over those years, the medical community has stretched out the time between bx’s. Every year, for the most part, is becoming excessive as long as you are doing MRI imaging every year. I’ve had 5 MRI’s and most recently, a PET/MR PSMA scan since 2017.

I think medical consensus has somewhat debunked that theory.

KocoPr profile image
KocoPr in reply toEJC61

I can’t find consensus by medical experts on that theory.

But if one just thinks about it one can certainly visualize an intact prostate capsule and Cancer being contained. Then picture puncturing the capsule 12 times with a needle and penetrating a tumor then sucking said tumor cells out then pulling contaminated needle out through the punture. If cancer cells are on the needle surface how does it not come out with the needle? Do they use a new needle for every puncture?

Do that every year under AS and your mind can conjure up scenarios.

How does the medical consensus explain or prove that doesn’t happen especially since nearly every single one of us has had a needle biopsy to get diagnosed.

EJC61 profile image
EJC61 in reply toKocoPr

You do need a confirmatory (2nd) bx to even be considered for AS in most programs. As long as you are getting MRI's done and DRE's and PSA checks on a consistant basis and data remains steady, doctors have been stretching the time between bx's. It's usually because of possible infection not spreading cancer via a needle. Getting one bx and then not following up is not AS and is more dangerous than worrying about the possibility of cancer spreading by needle. There's enough out there to make a decision one way or another.

LBRV711 profile image
LBRV711 in reply toEJC61

Wow. Things keep evolving, which sometimes makes me pause and slow down more.

LBRV711 profile image
LBRV711 in reply toKocoPr

This is all new to me. Not loving the idea of As and yearly biopsy, and not loving the idea of SBRT. But now I’m leaning toward treatment due to my decipher score and volume and family history. Still doing homework and may visit MSK in two weeks just to be thorough.

KocoPr profile image
KocoPr in reply toLBRV711

I had my prostate removed even though i was a gleason 6 and just one round of biopsy (original diagnosis).

After RP my rp biopsy upgraded me to a gleason 7 and the beast had escaped. EBRT didn’t get it either, but I regretfully turned down the recommended 6 months of lupron. Don’t know if that would have made any difference.

LBRV711 profile image
LBRV711 in reply toKocoPr

Thank you. Of course, this is what worries me. And I thank you for your sharing.

LBRV711 profile image
LBRV711 in reply toEJC61

Yes, the one abutting the left lateral wall from what I remember and the fact that 5 out of 12 fragments and a 4.3 on genomic testing is what’s pushing me more toward treatment now. I’m usually very decisive with things. Not this.

KocoPr profile image
KocoPr

Hi LBRV, did you see MSK? Did you make a decision?

Hope it’s all working out

LBRV711 profile image
LBRV711 in reply toKocoPr

Hey KocoPr. Thank you so much for reaching out. I spoke with them and with another urologist who I know through business connections. I decided to move forward with sbrt cyberknife at nyu langone. Honestly, after talking about my prostate cancer with friends and neighbors, I can’t believe how many have prostate cancer and so many of them have used Dr. Haas at NYU Langone with great success. So I feel good about my decision. I’ve been impressed with the social worker, nutritionist, and entire team. So I feel comfortable. I have fiducial markers and space oar being done on 12/22, then another mri and ct scan on 1/5 plus molds made for my legs. Then treatment begins 1/22, 5 sessions done every other day. At this point I feel less stress because my decision is made. Also, knowing numerous people that went through it, it seems like this is the place and guy if you live in Long Island.

May I ask how you’re doing. Seems like your journey has been long, and I am hoping things are going well for you at this time. Please let me know. And again, thank you for following up with me. It’s definitely a lonely journey.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Thinking of Active Surveillance with 3+4

Received my results on Feb 28 that I had 1 core of 3+3, not worried about that one.... But I had...
MauiJef profile image

After Active Surveillance since 2013, time to explore treatment options

I am new here, and found out about this place from reading TallAllen's blog "Prostate Cancer News,...

Advice on genomic testing: which one, whether it will add anything?

Hello friends. Just diagnosed. Intermediate risk stage. I am concerned my PSA (0.7/3yrs) is not...
45RPM profile image

PSA RISING

Hello, in October of 23 my PSA was tested and was 4.7. I am a 59 year old generally healthy guy....
Muskyguy profile image

A Long Journey To This Place

It was devastating news in early November to hear that Alan has aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason...
Londear1992 profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.