First anniversary of RALP, my PSA has crept up from 0.02 to 0.04 (GS 4+5=9, pT3b). During this period, I was taking monthly tests except during the recent lock-down when there was a 3.5 months gap. Prior to the latest test I didn't take any medicine or supplement, statines included, for 8 days. Analyzing my test results I found an unbelievably high correlation of PSA to the triglycerides count as computed from cholesterol, i.e. 5*(Total - HDL -LDL). The correlation coefficient of 97.8%, (R^2=0.956) is very HIGH. Furthermore, accounting for the quantization errors of the PSA, (0.02, 0.03, 0.04) one even can suspect a perfectly linear relation. Another interesting finding was that the PSA to time correlation is, by a very small margin, in favour of linear than exponential occurrence. By wishful thinking this can play-down suspicions for a typical BCR, where the exact opposite is the rule.
I searched and found this paper:
"Serum Lipid Profile and Risk of Prostate Cancer Recurrence: Results from the SEARCH Database", 2014, cebp.aacrjournals.org/conte... concluding to:
"Conclusions: Elevated serum triglycerides were associated with increased risk of prostate cancer recurrence. Cholesterol, LDL, or HDL were not associated with recurrence risk among all men. However, among men with dyslipidemia, elevated cholesterol and HDL levels were associated with increased and decreased risk of recurrence, respectively."
My case seems to disagree with the above claim regarding total-C (cor. coef. of 89.6%), but shares a very weak agreement with HDL by a negative cor. coef. of -9.3%.
My imminent project is to try lowering total-C (having the wrong gene) and especially triglycerides in order to see if spotted correlation is maintained, that is, can stop the advancement of PSA. Will let you know in time.