The above looks a bit technical but I am in a bit of a fix following a review at Moorfields Eye Hospital. I recently had an emergency with my eye in July, diagnosed as Uveitis and prescribed 60mgs pred. That was reduced after inflammation reduced and eye ok. Now Moorfields diagnosed secondary glaucoma caused by steroids following increased pressures in the eye. My blood sugar was 11.5, it was 4 hours after pred and I had eaten half a sandwich 30 minutes previously. I am working on low carbs and due a HB1C ? test in a week to see if that has helped.
I have PMR, diagnosed in May this year and was already on pred, managed largely by me(with help from the forum) with the odd call from GP after blood tests. I had a flare (affecting eye and PMR)a few weeks ago having tried to reduce too quickly and am now on 18mgs,staying for a further 2 weeks to be sure before reducing to 16 mgs.
The consultant at Moorfields is concerned that I have so many side effects from the pred he wanted to start me on methatrexate and reduce the steroids. I declined the offer, advised that I was actually seeing the GP in 2 days and will formulate a plan. They also wanted me to be referred to a rheumatologist (that would be the one I discharged myself from initially,) not because she was poor but because she was taking months to decide if I had PMR with endless tests etc.. and I couldn't wait , becoming increasingly debilitated and with a husband with Parkinsons. Went private for the diagnosis, I was classic in presentation and 20 mgs pred afforded a miraculous improvement. He is giving me 6 weeks to see how I go on reducing but this isn't long and he isn't now prescribing the steroids anyway.
So, after all that I am caught between two disciplines, the GP may agree with them, maybe not but I feel sure that the rheumy would?? They wanted me to refer to her, I declined again.I need a plan and information. I have seen on here that Methotrexate may not be helpful and adding another drug with it's own side effects doesn't fill me with joy. Also, people on the biologics appear to fare better so if that is the case should I ask for those if I am unable to avoid this path?
Personally I would prefer to very slowly reduce the steroids despite all the issues.
Thank you in advance. x