I was interested in the recent 'political' discussion on here but did not comment, not because I was not interested but because I was more interested in seeing it develop. So the question I have is what makes a 'community' a community? Here's my thoughts. I live in a community and there are many I do not know and don't interrelate with but I would still consider those part of the community or even 'my' community. So something in common whether location or interest seems to be at least one part of the necessary conditions.
I can benefit from getting information from my community or here but I can also get information from Wikipedia and I know others do too who have my interests yet I do not consider those a community for some reason. Perhaps some commitment to the community seems to be a condition to make community. Perhaps also some rules or if not that at least someone who is seen as representative of the community and has implied or assumed power to speak with some authority is also a necessary condition. And it also seems necessary that there at least some givers, those who give benefits, otherwise people will not have needs fulfilled. For many personal relationship building is a necessary requirement and for others watching that occurring is sufficient.
I think a community becomes resilient after it goes through a number of stages. Some at least have to have made a transition from ' a community' to 'the community' and on to 'my community'.
So if you read this far please disagree or ignore! I know the philosophy of online community will cause many to up the pred!