My bloods have been positive RA but inflammatory markers normal
I am in so much pain and RA consultant just said no action my doctor is wanting more information and dosnt agree with her
My bloods have been positive RA but inflammatory markers normal
I am in so much pain and RA consultant just said no action my doctor is wanting more information and dosnt agree with her
Are you already diagnosed with RA, and on any meds?. Most of the medication for RA, unfortunately takes time to take effect, most are 12 weeks +. Is it maybe the case that they feel it’s too early to change meds. Most rheumatologists unfortunately won’t administer steroid injections, if your inflammatory markers are normal. Your GP though if they disagree, could try a short course of steroids to see how you respond. You also have the right to a second opinion if you’re not happy with their treatment plan.
Hi I was recommended methatexrate 6years ago and I asked could I keep on the naproxen… but then they were saying it could be a positive/negative so was told probably osteoarthritis I have just had a knee replacement and surgeon commented on my bones being like butter and to get a dexa test which came back as osteoporosis.. but my joints are really bad and pain team have recommended tramadol and amtripline, I am due a cortisone injection in the other knee on Monday but really not to sure in having it
If your other knee is causing you pain, it would be worth having. Otherwise you risk your new joint taking the burden as you’ll be reluctant to out full weight through it. If you and your gp disagree, then get a second opinion. It is also possible to have both RA & OA in the same joint.
Naproxen, I thought was not good, long term ?
the cortisone in your knee can help your knee and also make the rest of you feel better. And if it does you can argue that if this works then there must be inflammation despite low markers.
I never have high inflammation markers even when joints are hot and swollen I might get up to 20 (my lab norm is that under 20 is normal). Most times it’s 1 or 2. Luckily (!) I am anti-CCP positive so my rheumy accepts that this is how I am and looks at me, not the blood test results.
You may be, like me, "sero negative" but have RA - keep going back, make a nuisance of yourself until someone takes you seriously.
Can I ask you your RA number is
Sero-negative means that they don’t test positive for the rheumatoid factor, I assume that’s what you mean by RA number. Rheumatoid factor isn’t a reliable test for RA. Many people have RA and and don’t have a positive rheumatoid factor and about 10% of the general population are positive but will never develop RA. It is often checked when diagnosing RA as it can be an indicator but it is always looked at along side presenting symptoms. Some medications are thought to work better in either sero-positive (with rheumatoid factor) or sero-negative (without rheumatoid factor) so it’s useful to know which you are. Once diagnosed it is not routinely measured as it doesn’t give any extra useful information.
A more useful blood test is the anti-CPP test. It’s still not infallible but seems to be more reliable than rheumatoid factor. Maybe ask if you can have this test done?