I am an appointee for my son and that arrangement has worked very well. My son only has his benefits and no other assets. When he moved to supported living though I needed to sign a tenancy agreement, so I applied to the Court of Protection to be a deputy for his property and affairs.
I got a Court Order for the tenancy a while ago and I have now received a letter which will appoint me as a deputy providing I take out a bond. I know that if I take this on I will need to open a bank account in my son's name and account for his finances to the Court.
My problem is that the supported living provider is very disorganised in terms of financial affairs. He has been a t this placement some time and I have never managed to establish how much I should be paying for his bills for example. I have a current arrangement whereby I draw cash to pay for his food and any personal expenses he might have.
To be clear I don’t think there is any dishonesty with the provider and, if anything, I think I may be paying too little. I think the prospect of getting receipts with this provider is going to be challenging though.
I am in a dilemma about whether to stick with being an appointee or become a deputy. It could be simpler to have his finances separated from my own and I know I should be able to expect the provider to be more organised. It seems absurd to have done the application and not go through with it but I wonder if this is going to cause me a lot of stress and difficulty in practice.
Can anyone give me insight into what level of detail is required in reporting to the court? Any thoughts about whether it might be better to remain as an appointee would be much appreciated.