My son has Autism and Rubinstein Taybi Syndrome, he is registered with his GP as Clinically vulnerable. As his main carer I was offered the Coronavirus Vaccine under the conditions of being a carer for a person that is clinically vulnerable.
However, as he is so scared of needles and has a known history of never allowing a nurse near him with a flu jab each and every year, he has had to be admitted into hospital on 2 separate occasions for minor dental and toe nail work which he had to be sedated in order to administer Local Anaesthetic.
With this in mind, back in December when the Coronavirus Vaccines were first being made available, I embarked on a mission to resolve any issues that may occur in administering the coronavirus vaccine to him, and others like him, by trying to make sure a practical solution and plan was put into place well in advance.
However to my utter frustration, on 14th February the Government announced to the world that everyone in his cohort had either had a vaccine or had been offered one, yet he had neither.
On 24th February the Government again announce that all those that are clinically vulnerable should now have one and if they have not been offered one they should contact their GP. I had been in constant contact with my GP but he had still not been offered one.
Considering my GP surgery and also others locally that I know of, all have telephone voice messages telling callers “if your call is regarding coronavirus vaccines, please hang up now, we will call you when it is your time” this government message to the world seems to have escaped the very places that could action it.
It is clear that my son needs sedation in order to receive the vaccines by his medical history and the more recent attempts with various changes to venues and nasal sprays tested and failed. Indeed the reasons given for not inviting him for a vaccine was that he needed sedation.
It now appears that the position within care settings is not to sedate patients for this and wait until they have to be sedated for other treatments such as dental care and administer vaccine then.
Baring in mind My son does not currently need any dental treatment that requires sedation, nor any other such treatment, it appear we have to just sit and wait until he does, which could be months if not years.
Following a week of mass media attention placed on various Government, scientific and health authorities statements, stressing that the benefits of the AZ Vaccine by far out weigh the risks. I am struggling to understand how giving a sedative to clinically vulnerable with needle phobias can possible tip those scales in the opposite way, especially when they have been sedated without any issues in the past.
Perhaps some one can help to clarify how the argument against anti vaccers is also being used the opposite way against those with needle phobias, by explaining how my son can be treat as if he is less important than anti vaccers and for him not to have the vaccine is somehow OK..
PS I have already wrote to my MP and the response he got from the Government minister for vaccines is attached, which sadly made no attempt to address my question. So I was wondering if anyone else is in the same position and why nothing is being done about this,