Popular Supplement Linked To Heart Diseas... - Cure Parkinson's

Cure Parkinson's

26,583 members27,901 posts

Popular Supplement Linked To Heart Disease. Niacin = B3 could be dangerous

MBAnderson profile image
24 Replies

7 mins

youtu.be/0REvBPcoXO8?si=IIS...

Written by
MBAnderson profile image
MBAnderson
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
24 Replies
park_bear profile image
park_bear

Also discussed here: healthunlocked.com/cure-par...

Bolt_Upright profile image
Bolt_Upright

Thanks Marc.

Keep in mind that I AM NOT A SMART PERSON.

Everybody has heard of Maslow's hierarchy of needs.

It starts with Physiological:

Air

Water

Food

Heat

Clothes

Reproduction

Shelter

Sleep

I have a Hierarchy of fears:

LBD - MSA - PD

Everything else

I'm not offering advice here. Just sharing how I think.

Bolt_Upright profile image
Bolt_Upright in reply toBolt_Upright

Just as an aside, I don't understand Maslow's hierarchy. I would rearrange it:

Air

Water

Heat

Food

Sleep

Clothes

Shelter

Reproduction

MarionP profile image
MarionP in reply toBolt_Upright

Maslow was seriously good and his system holds extremely well today.

MBAnderson profile image
MBAnderson in reply toBolt_Upright

You're smart enough to wear clothes.

What about SNL? I don't see it.

Bolt_Upright profile image
Bolt_Upright in reply toMBAnderson

Made me laugh. It would be interesting to see how far down SNL is on Maslow's hierarchy today. In the late 70's it would have been a lot higher than today, that is for sure.

reedboat2 profile image
reedboat2

This guy Stanfield is knocking down all the sacred cows of my supplement regimen. First Resveratrol, now Niacin. What’s next?

JayPwP profile image
JayPwP in reply toreedboat2

Parkinson's!!!😆😆😆

Bolt_Upright profile image
Bolt_Upright in reply toreedboat2

Well... he did not say B3 would not be helpful for some things. He just said it may cause heart disease.

I kind of think everything in life has to abide by Newton's third law. Newton's third law states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. The "action" and "reaction" refer to forces; if Object A exerts a force on Object B, then Object B exerts an equal amount of force on Object A in the opposite direction.

MBAnderson profile image
MBAnderson in reply toBolt_Upright

Which is to say many supplements may be useless or harmful.

Gioc profile image
Gioc

As soon as he discovers that Big Pharma sells a form of B3 patented as an anti-cholestreol drug, he deletes the video and the search too. :-)

*Acipimox*

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acipimox

my-personaltrainer.it/farma...

Correct to delete an incorrect link

MBAnderson profile image
MBAnderson in reply toGioc

Gioc,

I don't understand the links??

Gioc profile image
Gioc in reply toMBAnderson

😊

ok, I corrected it 🙏

gaga1958 profile image
gaga1958

FYI--

For those using the TruNiagen product they write this address. (Towards the bottom, where it starts with Table 1 Summary, originally in was in chart form, but didn't copy/paste here that way.)

===========================================

First, the active ingredient in Tru Niagen is not niacin, and was not implicated in this study. Niacin is a family of different forms of vitamin B3 that differ structurally and functionally. Tru Niagen features patented nicotinamide riboside (NIAGEN NR). While it’s in the niacin family, it is safe, with over 30 peer-reviewed, published clinical studies demonstrating no adverse effects or increased risk of cardiovascular disease.

You are referencing a highly sensationalized and misleading press release issued by the Cleveland Clinic regarding a recent niacin study (published in Nature Medicine).

It’s important to know that this was an observational study, meaning it could only assess associations, not determine causality. In other words, this was not a randomized, controlled intervention study (niacin, or other forms of vitamin B3 were not administered), so no conclusions of cause and effect can be drawn from the study. The clickbait press release and its title position the study results as conclusive, inappropriately linking common B vitamins and other NAD+ precursors to heart disease. Furthermore, the release fails to acknowledge key study limitations.

Below is a list of limitations mentioned by the study authors:

The study was observational, meaning it sought to identify associations between factors and outcomes. Observational studies cannot assess cause and effect and are not the gold standard for clinical research, which is randomized, placebo-controlled trials. As such, the study only showed correlation, not causation.

Subjects were recruited from four referral centers with a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cardiometabolic disease risk factors. Thus, the observations are not representative of the general population.

The authors implicate niacin (and other vitamin B3 NAD+ precursors) as potentially problematic in “excess,” but fail to define what constitutes “excess.” Furthermore, the authors speculate that fortification of foods like breads and cereals with niacin may increase the risk of CVD without providing any evidence that the doses used in fortification pose safety issues.

Despite suggesting a cautious approach be taken with NAD+ precursor fortification and supplementation, the present study does not assess the dietary intake of niacin or other vitamin B3 NAD+ precursors in the subject cohort studied.

It’s implied that the authors assume that all NAD+ precursors are the same, when in fact that is not the case. For example, niacin (also known as nicotinic acid) is known to cause uncomfortable flushing and cause liver toxicity at high (> 500mg/day) doses. In contrast, nicotinamide riboside (NR), another NAD+ precursor, does not cause flushing and its use has not been associated with liver toxicity.

We are working closely with the Council for Responsible Nutrition to contact the Cleveland Clinic and requested they issue a corrected press release.

Results of the study are contradicted by many other previously published clinical and preclinical studies showing that other vitamin B3 NAD+ precursors, such as NR, do not increase risk for CVD and/or increase inflammation. In fact, the opposite is true. Fifteen clinical studies demonstrate the safety of oral NR, with seven published clinical studies to date showcasing that oral NR actually reduces inflammation.

Table 1 below provides an outline of these clinical and preclinical studies showcasing the beneficial effects of NR supplementation in inflammation.

Tru Niagen is backed by the highest scientific, safety, quality, and transparency standards, and has been accepted by the world’s most rigorous regulatory bodies such as the United States FDA, Health Canada, the European Commission, and others.

If you have further questions, please contact our Tru Niagen customer service team at customercare@truniagen.com. Please note that Tru Niagen is a dietary supplement to be used as recommended, and is not intended to diagnose, treat, prevent, or cure any disease or illness. We recommend consulting your healthcare practitioner if you have any additional questions specific to your health.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TABLE 1. Summary of peer-reviewed, published NR studies demonstrating an anti-inflammatory effect in humans.   

NICOTINAMIDE RIBOSIDE STUDIES 

Publication 

Dose/Duration

Study Population

Key Results

Elhassan et al., 2019 

1,000mg/day for 21 days  

Marginally overweight, but otherwise healthy older adult men  

NR reduced levels of circulating inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-5, IL-2, and TNF-α  

Zhou et al., 2020 

1,000mg/day for 5-9 days  

Hospitalized patients with stage D heart failure undergoing advanced heart failure therapy evaluations  

NR reduced gene expression of NLRP3 and inflammatory cytokines (IL-1B, IL-6, and IL-18)   

Remie et al., 2020 

1,000mg/day for 6 weeks  

Healthy overweight and obese men and postmenopausal women   

NR resulted in a significant trend toward a reduction in plasma IL-1α levels   

Wu et al., 2022 

1,000mg/day for one week  

Young healthy subjects and patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)  

NR reduced relative mRNA expressions of inflammatory cytokines IFN-β and CXCL10   

Brakedal et al., 2022 

1,000mg/day for 4 weeks  

Newly diagnosed dopaminergic therapy-naïve Parkinson’s disease patients  

NR reduced levels of inflammatory cytokines in the serum: VEGF and GDF15, as well as in cerebrospinal fluid: G-CSF, IL-7, IL-1RA, CCL4  

Wang et al., 2022 

2,000mg/day for 12 weeks  

Stage C heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients and age-matched healthy subjects  

NR reduced expression of NLRP3 and resulted in directionally similar, though nonsignificant, changes in expression of other inflammatory markers (IL-1B, IL-6, IL-18, and TNF-α)  

Han et al., 2023 

1,000mg/day for 1 week 

Young, healthy subjects  

NR blunted TH1 and TH17 immune cell responsiveness and depressed the secretion of IFNγ and IL-17 in CD4+ T cells 

Bolt_Upright profile image
Bolt_Upright in reply togaga1958

Thanks. I guess that is a response from TruNiagen? That's fair. I don't understand how they can say NR is "safe" as there have been no long term studies. I am not suggesting NR is not safe either. I think it is an unknown.

I am sticking with my Nicotinic Acid. I'm not convinced that by the study there is a risk. I have a High School Degree. If there was a risk, I would accept the risk. I don't know why I have so much trust in NA. I am not a smart man. Buyer beware.

CaseyInsights profile image
CaseyInsights in reply toBolt_Upright

I too have a ‘High School Degree’, and I swear by Niacin. So right on for those with with this enviable accolade ✨😎✨

Missy0202 profile image
Missy0202 in reply togaga1958

Thanks for posting. I also take 900mg of Tru Niagen per day..... but have been contemplating going down to 600mg

gaga1958 profile image
gaga1958 in reply toMissy0202

I take their 1,000 for ease of less pills

JayPwP profile image
JayPwP

The video says high dose Niacin reduced LDL cholesterol but increased all cause mortality by 10%

This is in line with Dr. Paul Mason referencing studies on LDL where it was observed that the higher the LDL, the lower the mortality.

youtu.be/TRB0jOfymLk

MBAnderson profile image
MBAnderson in reply toJayPwP

good video

MarionP profile image
MarionP

The higher the LDL, the LOWER the mortality?

JayPwP profile image
JayPwP in reply toMarionP

Yes, all cause mortality.

Have a look at the Paul Mason video I posted in the previous comment, around 2 mins mark.

MarionP profile image
MarionP

👍 yep he did say it.

eschneid profile image
eschneid

To quote Newton & Bolt, for every opinion on anything to do with cholesterol- there are equal, opposite & constantly changing opinions and studies.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

"High levels of niacin linked to heart disease, new research suggests"

"High levels of niacin, an essential B vitamin, may raise the risk of heart disease by triggering...

Could the NAD+ precursor, Niagen, be the best supplement ever?

I was dancing around this topic because I guess I thought people would read my links and understand...
sunvox profile image

Could Fungus and Mold be an Important Contributor to Parkinson’s Disease?

Why did this die off? https://www.parkinson.org/blog/whats-hot/fungus-mold-contributor-parkinsons...
JayPwP profile image

Curcumin seems to have protective effects in Alzheimer's disease. Could it be good for PD?

This long article looks at how curcumin interacts with the amyloid beta protein and seems...
wriga profile image

Could this also be one of the root causes of parkinson's disease?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-68566096
Grumpy77 profile image