Medical marijuana is safe and effective f... - Cure Parkinson's
Medical marijuana is safe and effective for people with Parkinson's and other diseases
thanks for the post. i am one of those people who is helped by thc.
Well I know it was protecting my husbands brain from all the infections and toxins in his body.
His employer made him stop and he’s gone downhill ever since. We found out about the infective components after cessation of cbd oil. ( Lyme, mycoplasma, mercury, mold toxicity ( mycotoxins)). We are being treated by a holistic functional med dr near us, and that is all he does is chronic infections, mold, metal, viral components.
He is 38 years old.
2Farmboys,
You might ask your functional medicine doctor about adding in colloidal silver nanoparticles to the regimen as it is a broad spectrum antibacterial/antimcrobial, antiviral , antiparasitic and antifungal all in one with a very good safety profile and a product with a lower probability of developing resistant strains of pathogens because of its multiple methods of action. It has also shown synergism with other antipathogenic modalities including antibiotics and it has shown the ability to render certain antibiotics that have become ineffective, as useful again! It has also shown the ability to cross the BBB!
Art
Yes, he was on it for months when treating Lyme. We did not know about the mycoplasma at that time though.
We do still have some and I use it as do my kids.
Just curious as to the dose of daily silver he was using for those months?
Art
Our dr had him on 1 tsp/day during the initial Lyme protocol.
He is doing the mycoplasma series by desbio right now.
It triggers the immune system to attack the mycoplasma. He has 2 more weeks on the first round of treatment for mycoplasma.
The Lyme is not a problem at this time. ( cd57 is increasing nicely).
We both have appts this week and I will inquire about adding in silver again. But I don’t think my husband can take any more killing off of anything right now anyway.
Do you know what parts per million(PPM) the silver nanoparticles were? The reason I ask is because in order for just one teaspoon per day to have any effect at all, it would have to be extremely high PPM silver nanoparticles. This is based on studies that have shown the uptake of CS into humans and based on an average blood capacity of roughly 5 liters for an adult. I have figured it out before and when I have used 20 ppm silver nanoparticles (a very common concentration) I needed to do a loading dose of one quart per day for three to four days and then a maintenance dose of 250 ~ 500 ml per day for as long as I take it. The manufacturer can not put such dosing on their label because they would then have to explain why to the FDA. That would make it appear that they are actually trying to treat something, and they can make no medical claims so that won't fly with the FDA.
Even when I make 320 ppm silver nanoparticles, when diluted, one tablespoon is only equal to one cup of 20 ppm colloidal silver. Colloidal silver is a very potent antipathogen, but it still takes so much silver to be effective, just like anything else. One liter or quart of 20 ppm silver only contains roughly 20 mg of silver.
Art
It is 10 ppm.
I do know that at the beginning of my treatment, the dr had me cycle through 10 day on/off cycles, and I could tell it was killing off nasty things. I herxed every round I took it, until like round 6 or 7. I was stripping Lyme biofilm and then killing them with silver. Plus I had other bacterial components as well. I’m
Still quite a mess, but like a turtle making very slow progress due to unfortunate circumstances of viral reactivation still and can’t get out of toxin filled home...just trying to lessen the load where we can.
Yes, herxing can be quite a ride! I have had a mild herx reaction only one time on CS and I have also had a herx with Lugol's iodine when I first tried it, but both were relatively mild with a mild to moderate headache and a feeling of a slight beer buzz. Not bad at all compared to others I have read about!
For the sake of comparison on dosing, if a quart of silver nanoparticles (10 ppm) contains roughly 10 mg of silver and you take one teaspoon of that quart, how much silver are you actually getting per teaspoon? There are 192 teaspoons in a quart so it would be 10 mg of silver divided by 192. 10 divided by 192 = .108695 or roughly 1/10th of one mg of silver per teaspoon (the dose your doctor recommended per day) and only a portion of that will be absorbed by the body. I think that is pretty self explanatory. That means you are only getting 1 / 10th of one milligram of silver in your whole body! In order for silver nanoparticles to neutralize a pathogen they have to actually come in contact with the pathogen or come extremely close to it. At 1 / 10th of a milligram of silver total in the human body, that scenario becomes impossible. Studies have shown this low of a silver concentration to be of no effect.
Art
I think he uses it just for immune support.
We used 2 tsp dAily when my 8 year old had an ear infection, and he herxed bad on that, but we got the infection.
Yes on the lugols as well, my husband is also on that as are our kids, among other things.
Oh, and our physician cured himself of acute Lyme and his wife of chronic Lyme. So I trust his decisions as far as how to treat.
The man is a genious! I’ve never met another physician who is as knowledgeable, of course I came from allopathic med screwing me up and almost killing me, And our dr saved my life..because I truly believe I’d be dead right now if it weren’t for him.
The Daily Mail (U.K.) is, of course, a well-known, accredited source of trustworthy medical information. Not! It befits us to exercise much caution about such info since so much pure hokum appears online and in the media. Let me illustrate. A check of Pub Med shows 37 publications by L. Mechtler or LL. Mechtler.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?te...
None of them has anything to do with cannabis. This means that Dr. Mechtler's marijuana research has not yet appeared in print after being passed before a jury of his peers, the first and most routine hurdle before scientific research can be judged credible. (Peer review is necessary but not sufficient since faulty research often does make its way into print. The Daily Mail article is current, so it's possible that Dr. Mechtler's research is on its way through the months-long, clunky process of peer review.) MORAL OF THE STORY: "Buyer beware" has never been more essential than in this age of info explosion, marketing overkill, and self-certified "experts."