Hello, I wondering if I am the outcast here...my first rheumatologist gave me narcotic pain meds to treat the pain while we try meds to control the disease. She said this was common practice and that I should not be concerned with it and once we find the right medacine I will no longer need them and we will go from there. She has since retired.
My new rheumatologist was apparently apauled that I was recieving pain medacine for pain, and said that she would never prescribe narcotic to an RA patient. I understand that there is a correlation between narcotic pain meds and fibromyalgia type pain, so I understand. But for me the quality of life I have while taking my medacine is WAY higher than with out...with out I have a very hard time. I'm a mother of 3,4&10 year old. Train horses and homeschool. When I have gone off my pain meds my life depletes to a sad version. And I miss being active. I use cimzia, but I don't think it's doing what I want and I've had to go off three times due to infection and other insurance reasons. I have failed many other treatments as one doc told me, I personally think they failed me...anyway. I've been through the methotrexate, plaquanill...and many others. I do take mobic and a muscle relaxer but that was before the Ra, I've always had back problems. I also use prednisone spairingly. I was on a high level for too long and muscles started going tiny atrophy so I cannot control pain that way anymore hence why we had started the slow release pain management.
Am I the only person who counts on pain medacine to control pain?
Thank you and please no snarky attitudes with your answers, I'm asking because I want to know how others control pain, not to hear about what I'm doing wrong.