NEW MEDICATIONS ON THE HORIZON: I read a lot... - CLL Support

CLL Support

22,532 members38,709 posts

NEW MEDICATIONS ON THE HORIZON

wizzard166 profile image
8 Replies

I read a lot, and in particular have google news send notices to my email about new successful Clinical Trials in Phase 2 and 3 etc. To an extent I do this because I like to technically analyze stock charts, and want a jump on some possibly good investments.

My reason for this post is not to tout a stock; instead, it is because I want to share information with our group on new CLL medications that are making excellent progress. In particular the article is mentioning that these two medications are likely to be huge competitors to Imbruvica (Imbrutinib)

Here is a link to the article:

fiercepharma.com/pharma/ash...

Written by
wizzard166 profile image
wizzard166
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
8 Replies
Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator

It's good to options as they all have their own side effect profile and what will suit one won't always suit another

wizzard166 profile image
wizzard166 in reply to Jm954

Both of the medications mentioned in the article are still in Clinical Trials, and thus not available now, so I doubt the full disclosure on side effects are not even out yet. I simply felt it was good for our members to know that new and possibly exciting options are on the horizon.

Jm954 profile image
Jm954Administrator in reply to wizzard166

Acalabrutinib - Calquence has recently been considered by NICE in Uk for routine use and was available as part of an access scheme in UK for patients because of covid but, yes, Zanubrutinib is still in trials.

studebaker profile image
studebaker in reply to Jm954

Zanubrutinib is possible to get on compassionate bases in US. I know of someone who had AF after being on Acalabrutinib and is now on Zanubrutinib with no AF. Patient of Dr. Forman. I am checking it out if it would be possible to get in Canada with no luck so far.Dana

AussieNeil profile image
AussieNeilAdministrator

There are now competing drugs for all targeted CLL therapies, either in clinical trials or approved, with BTK inhibitors the most contested. See my post on BTK inhibitors and my later reply on BCL-2, PI3-K and anti-CD20 drugs here:

healthunlocked.com/cllsuppo...

Unfortunately, this additional competition doesn't necessarily seem to result in lower prices, if the recent price increases for Ibrutinib, with Acalabrutinib priced higher than Ibrutinib are a guide*, but importantly, it does mean that:-

1) For BTKi drugs, we may be able to switch to an alternative non-covalent bonding drug if we develop resistance to the approved BTKi drugs Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib

2) We may be able to switch to a drug in the same class which causes us less side effects or adverse events. For example, Acalabrutinib and Zanubrutinib have lower and slightly different side effect profiles that Ibrutinib, which importantly include a lower cardiovascular event risks.

Neil

*BeiGene is pricing Brukinsa at the whole sale acquisition price of $12,935 for a 30-day supply, a company spokesperson told FiercePharma. That comes on par with Imbruvica tablets' current tag but below Calquence's around $14,000: fiercepharma.com/marketing/...

bennevisplace profile image
bennevisplace in reply to AussieNeil

Another six years and the US patent on Ibrutinib for CLL expires pharmacompass.com/patent-ex.... That should bring down the price of market leader Ibrutinib and with it BTKi competitors that don't show a clear advantage.

In theory the same could happen if long term PFS/ OS data for BTKi drugs start to look shaky, which would be a surprise.

Then again, the prescription drugs market in the USA seems to suffer from a chronic shortfall in price competition ft.com/content/e92dbf94-d9a...

AussieNeil profile image
AussieNeilAdministrator in reply to bennevisplace

Pharmaceutical patents have been extended in Australia as part of the US/Australian Free Trade agreement and were not to Australia's advantage as marketed. From 2013, with my emphasis:-

"Australia's enthusiastic approach to extending the life of pharmaceutical patents has cost the economy “billions of dollars” an independent review has found.

Originally 14 years, then 16 years and now the 20 years enshrined in the US Australia Free Trade Agreement, the review finds the extensions to the standard life of drug patents have been made “without careful regard to whether this was in our own economic interest”.

Justified at the time a measures to “encourage the development of the pharmaceutical products industry in Australia” the review finds instead they've suppressed the development of a generic drugs industry and cost the government $200 million per year by slowing the entry of cheap generic drugs into the pharmaceutical benefits scheme."

smh.com.au/healthcare/drug-...

bennevisplace profile image
bennevisplace in reply to AussieNeil

FTAs are a mix of pros and cons. I guess this was one of the cons!

You may also like...

CLL Medications and Corona Virus

they were saying that the medical community is interested in the CLL medications possibly having a...

So much to share returning from Scotland for CLLAN Horizon and iwCLL

we expect to average more than 2 interviews or articles published every week. Also in 2020, we are...

What to do-New hematologist

results of bloodwork -CLL-30 months Imbruvica-first time in 10 years my chart is all within normal...

New guy to the group.

I take my Imbruvica before breakfast, and was wondering if it can be taken after a meal. Evidently I

Has anyone else experienced their WBC going up after starting the new capsules?

old capsules then was switched to the new capsules of Imbruvica, and my count went north after 2...