NASH and progression: Using a biopsy I... - British Liver Trust

British Liver Trust

37,512 members18,405 posts

NASH and progression

Splodge60 profile image
3 Replies

Using a biopsy I was diagnosed with this Fatty Liver problem in 2002 or thereabouts. My GGTs are regularly between 1000 and 2000 and other enzymes are also raised but not as dramatically. I do not drink any alcohol and have never done so. When my LFTs are checked regularly I keep being told......they’re stable figures so it’s ok. I’ve just persuaded my diabetic Registrar to send me for an Ultrasound of my liver. I fear that NASH has progressed to Fibrosis which concerns me. Is anyone else in a similar position and keep getting fobbed off. I am a 68 year old female

Written by
Splodge60 profile image
Splodge60
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
3 Replies
Kristian profile image
Kristian

Hi Splodge,

I found the same, for a long time my LFTs tests were pretty stable. I was told the same. Apparently what they tend to look for is trends, so if everything was stable they were happy to just watch and wait. Its usually when things changed that they tended to do more investigations with me. Those weren't necessarily just those test results that changed, but also significant symptom or actual synthetic liver function showed some form of degradation, or was degraded below normal for a period of time. Basically they just wanted to make sure it wasn't just an isolated instance.

I would though have thought, with results like yours, that they would have done some follow up ultrasounds just to check on progress, even if it was only every couple of years or so, as something looks to be consistently going on.

So, just to summarise, i don't think your docs are purposefully fobbing you off. But, it would be sensible to ensure you do have some additional monitoring. An ultrasound every year or two initially seems sensible to me. If anything is highlighted, or not, that can then determine if more frequent, or less frequent, reviews are necessary. It would also highlight if things like portal hypertension may have arisen. The ultrasound should therefore need to cover your spleen not just your liver. If its an abdominal ultrasound that has been ordered it should cover that, and your kidneys too. Which is useful from a diabetic point of view too.

Hope that's, helpful.

Kristian

(ps - great username)

Splodge60 profile image
Splodge60 in reply to Kristian

Thank you Kristian, I have just managed to persuade a Registrar Locum to send me for an ultrasound on my liver. Don’t know if they’ll do anything else. I am hoping that it will clarify things but who knows? What does a test like this reveal for eg. Would it show fibrosis?

Splodge60 profile image
Splodge60

Well, things are moving forward now. I am being referred to see a Gastroenterologist but no idea when because of vomiting blood and all other liver and/or stomach problems. I’m still not eating and all fluids now come back. Just had a vomiting episode and it produced 2inches of blood into sick bowl. Ah well, these things are sent to try us xxx

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

ALP and GGT

I was drinking about 70 units a week in January, I am female and 57, my liver blood tests came back...

NAFLD Question

I’m Rob, I have been having regular blood tests for the last five years for NAFLD, finally had a...

Clean eating and living

Hi every one I hope you are having a good day in the best why you all can I am trying to eat...

pain relief

Hi, I am a first timer asking questions about Fatty liver disease , I have not been out of ICU for...

Interesting diet study for NASH and Fibrosis.

"A clinical trial, led by a team at NDPCHS, has shown that a three-month rapid weight loss...