Faulty Bone Scan: I was diagnosed with... - Bone Health and O...

Bone Health and Osteoporosis UK

6,305 members2,766 posts

Faulty Bone Scan

Tlflom profile image
6 Replies

I was diagnosed with 31% bone loss in 2 years. After pursuing multiple specialist appointments. I ended up at a bone clinic. After a few questions the doc announced she did not believe the DEXA results. I was rescanned immediately.

The density was unchanged from the previous 6 years at the low end of normal! FYI, dramatic changes with no known causes might be a false reading. Guess who will be doing my DEXA from now on?

I was trained to perform Dexa and it is all computer automated so I don't know how it could be a tech error unless the daily calibrations were off.

Written by
Tlflom profile image
Tlflom
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
6 Replies
Jumpey profile image
Jumpey

So distressing that this happened. And those years of concern and worry.And great news for the future! X

Met00 profile image
Met00

From what I've read (but you'll obviously know more about this), DEXA machines should be recalibrated regularly and individual operators need to check their own calibration on a regular basis too. Although there's a lot of automation, it's possible to align the body wrongly, even to the extent of including the wrong vertebrae (hopefully that's extremely rare!) and also interpret the data incorrectly, for example by reference to the wrong database. What a good job the doctor at the bone clinic was on the ball!

Tlflom profile image
Tlflom in reply toMet00

For the tech running the dexa, there isn't much to do or get wrong. It is all pretty automatic. Which is why I totally trusted the result. Doing a regular xray does require positioning, dialing up the technical factors, and post processing. So a faulty dexa is either bad QA which is usually the beginning of each day and or faulty equipment. Both are quite concerning. I have not been able to reach the imaging director.

Met00 profile image
Met00 in reply toTlflom

You might be interested in this study: "technical errors were identified in 90% of patients and affected interpretation in 13%. Interpretation errors were present in 80% of patients; 42% were major" and "Conclusion: DXA technical and interpretation errors are extremely common and likely adversely affect patient care" (researchgate.net/publicatio....

Tlflom profile image
Tlflom in reply toMet00

Thank you. This sight left me with more questions (not a bad thing). I am always looking for good research, have saved the link and will be spending some time on it. Thanks again.

StormyRon profile image
StormyRon

Thank you for the heads up

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Trabecular Bone Scans

Hi Does anyone have any experience of having a trabecular bone scan please? My understanding is...
Mistydawn profile image

Bone density improvement

After several years of investigations, I was diagnosed with osteoporosis in August 2020. My t...

Raloxifene and improved bone density

I've been taking Raloxifene for 20 years and have not seen any improvement in bone density until my...
Pumpkin71 profile image

FORSTEO, TERAPARATIDE, AND BONE LOSS.

Wanted to share some information that has recently come to my attention regarding my treatment of...

Bone Density Scan

How often is it recommended to have a Bone Density Scan? Mine was about a year and a half ago....
Rocknlily profile image

Moderation team

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.