Hi all, I've not been on here in a very long time but thought I'd share this, as I'm so angry with the cardiologist I had the misfortune to have an appointment with a few days ago, he left me wishing I hadn't bothered.
I had an angiogram about 6years ago after suffering chest pain and shortness of breath, showing the signs of angina.
During the angiogram I suffered intense chest pain on injection, like having a heart attack, the doctor made no comments but I later discovered I didn't have blocked arteries, but a speculative diagnosis was made of small vessel disease.
I found it very confusing that so many names are given to it, including microvascular angina.
My doctor has been treating me for it with various drugs, since that time I've suffered hypertension and the last couple of years, type 2 diabetes, all of which I'm medicated for, so far, straight forward and under control.
So, a few months ago I started waking with chest pain and on checking my BP, found it was far too high, (183/133 gave me the most intense chest pain) meds would usually deal with it slowly, gtn worked sometimes but not always, and often I'd be left with a dull ache in my chest for hours. Any exertion would cause pain and breathlessness. These symptoms continued for a few weeks then returned to normal and under control.
An appointment was made with the cardiologist, who was the list holder at the local hospital, (a major West country one)
His attitude from the start was dismissive and arrogant.
He'd already decided I didn't have angina of any type as it didn't behave in that way, and my problem was probably indigestion..
The consultation over, I left feeling angry and rather depressed. He'd totally dismissed the last 6 years of my life.
Since then, I've found paperwork relating to my angiogram results and rapid access chest pain clinic, with mentions of small vessel desease, and just read an article on here which describes exactly what I've suffered.
I though mvd/small vessel disease, call it what you will was now recognised by doctors, cardiologists etc, seems I was sadly mistaken.
I'd be interested to hear if anyone else has had problems with not being believed.