This is a question for the experts but even they need some data to go on so here is my point:
Reading the forum highlights a wide variation in starting point for COPD. There are some who have been diagnosed in their 40s (even 30s!) and others not until, like me they are in their 60s. It is also the case that some younger ones are so bad a lung transplant is available while others, like me, are still a way off that stage and so are very unlikely to make such surgery even vaguely cost effective.
It is accepted I think that family history plays a part and certainly in mine and my brother's case our mother died of bronchial pneumonia at 77 after COPD for many years and her mother died of bronch-pnue ascribed then to smoking but from what I recall of her I would suggest she would have been diagnosed today with COPD before that London smog-aggravated event. Both were heavy smokers as was I until 93 and my brother until more recently. My gran's sister died of respiratory failure in her 70s but NEVER smoked. Another sister in Canada who did smpke also died of respiratory failure.
So if it is in the genes which seems accepted to a degree and we can today have a DNA test is there value to the NHS/nation in screening some/all kids at an early age and using the results to keep them off ANY form of inhalation practice?
As they say these, days, just asking....