I have a long history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and have been on blood thinner medication for 10 years treating my paroxysmal episodes with PIP . However last march I went into highly symptomatic persistent AF which did not reverse before undergoing a successful cardioversion in August. I've been on amiodarone since then originally at 200mg and reduced in December to 100mg. I had no episodes of AF since last August and my life improved dramatically.
Last week I went into AF which persisted for 12 hours before reverting normally. My cardiologist thinks I will continue to get these AF episodes and also wishes me to come off amiodarone though my monthly blood tests have been fine so far. So she has recommended ablation as next treatment. Im feeling quite nervous as Im 79. What do you think?
Written by
Midnight2022
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
If it’s any help at age 70 my EP said I was one of their younger patients and ablations are regularly given to people in their 80s . Of course your medical team will be able to assess your fitness for the procedure, but if you are in general good health I would say you’ll be fine. I had a cryoablation under sedation that knocked me out and had the advantage of being quicker to leave the system than general anaesthetic. Good luck and keep exercising in the meantime!
Although age is no reason to not undergo an ablation know that it is not always a permanent solution as AF can and often does return after some time. The ablation procedure itself is not a big deal but of course it is an invasive procedure which comes with some risks although complications are rare. Given a choice of staying on Amiodarone long term and ablation - I’d choose ablation but it is always a personal choice.
Take your time to make your decision and do as much research as you can on what is on offer. Have you read all the information available on the AFA website?
Many contributors on this forum have undergone ablation so ask any specific questions you have about your concerns and I am sure people will respond.
Can only speak from my experience but I'd say have the ablation. Had mine about 2 months ago under local sedation. The procedure was straight forward. Not painful. Slight ache in groin for week or so where they entered the body. The results seem to have been successful. If they've recommrndrd it for you I'd trust their advice. That's why we go to them. I'm 67 but I don't really think agr makes that much if a difference. Good luck
I was on Amiodarone for 4 years with no problems and then had an ablation at age 60 and was on it through the blanking period and now finally off of it. Good luck to you.
I had PAF for quite a long time. The episodes became more frequent over the years and lasted longer. I presented a spreadsheet of 3 years PAF history to my Cardiologist and EP. Both said " You are an ideal candidate for an ablation". I took their advice and had an ablation 5 years ago. I have never looked back and have a much better quality of life but don't take anything for granted. Good luck in your decision making!
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.
Ablation Denied!
AF after diarrhoea 
First post from yet another fearful afibber (lone longstanding persistent) facing an ablation!
ablation or no ablation, that is the question
