Clarifying previous post re ELIQUIS AND XAR... - AF Association

AF Association

20,713 members25,398 posts

Clarifying previous post re ELIQUIS AND XARELTO-- HOW DO YOU TEST THAT THEY ARE WORKING?

psage
psage

hi, again: i had a gastric bypass 18 years ago. Absorption of nutrients and meds is compromised. I have afib since 2007 and supposed to take an anticoagulant due to: female, over 65, high blood pressure (controlled by lisinopryl). After researching for a long time i started taking Eliquis. My cardio prefers Warfarin, since you can monitor therapeutic range and there is an antidote. Research and doctors say there are no reliable monitoring tests for Eliquis, and no research on bariatric surgery effects on anticoagulants. There is no research on obese patients either, which might affect the appropriate dosage. The big trials that got these drugs approved have decided on a 'one size fits all' approach. My question here, to whoever might be taking eliquis or xarelto, is whether you have been given any blood tests to determine that your system is absorbing and metabolizing the medication and whether you are in 'therapeutic range.' There are some tests but they are not 'recommended for monitoring.' I've been taking Eliquis for 3 weeks and i have no side effects -- no bruising, no cut fingers bleeding longer, nothing. So right now, i have no idea if the stuff is even getting into my system. Any information or experience anyone might share is appreciated. Thanks.

4 Replies
oldestnewest

thanks for your response! yes, i'm on 5mg 2x daily. that seems to be the approved dosage for afib until you get old and really thin. then it's 2.5. the lack of side effects is not a good sign at all. it's possible i'm under dosed, between the mal-absorption and my higher weight. OTH, i have bloodwork checked once a year since the bypass, over 20 different panels, minerals, organs, etc--always smack in the middle of normal range. except for iron, which i was taking incorrectly. easily adjusted. i dont want to take warfarin at all. it's considered successful and reliable because of habit and history --and until recently, no competition. i would just feel a lot better if i knew for sure eliquis was in my blood.

Rellim296
Rellim296 in reply to psage

You are raising interesting points psage and what does one do if one's weight is right on the 60kg dividing line between normal and thin?

As you are not keen on Warfarin, I'll say that the antidote can be very slow to take effect and thus can be not as magic as it sounds and testing INR is excellent for those who find themselves always nicely in the therapeutic range. However if the result is frequently not in range, or just on the fringes (which can be worse as you stick to the same dose) it's a very unsettling situation, with every test a big hurdle and a constant sense that the dose might be wrong - which is what you are currently feeling on your current medication.

MarkS
MarkS in reply to Rellim296

Hi Rellim,

When you refer to the very slow reversal of warfarin I assume you're talking about Vit K, which is only used in non-emergency situations. In emergencies, PCC is used which provides immediate reversal.

Mark

Rellim296
Rellim296 in reply to MarkS

That's right, Mark. I was referring to vitamin K.

It's always good to have your knowledgeable input.

You may also like...