Afib forever: What is more important... - Atrial Fibrillati...

Atrial Fibrillation Support

32,413 members38,745 posts

Afib forever

Auntiejo profile image
9 Replies

What is more important with afib and flutter- the heart rhythm or the heart rate ? I have been in constant afib and flutter since my ablation on May 18th and I am taking xarelto, flecainide and bisoprolol I also had a cardioversion on the 23rd which lasted for 24 hours and then went back into afib. Does this sound familiar to anyone? Auntiejo

Written by
Auntiejo profile image
Auntiejo
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
9 Replies
Beancounter profile image
BeancounterVolunteer

Hi Auntiejo

Rate in my opinion, I have a fairly normal rate but continuous never out of AF, heart beat sounds like a pair of trainers in a tumble dryer.

Of course symptoms come next, if the flec and the bisoprolol is the only thing keeping your rate down, then you need further treatment, and potentially an ablation. I am very luckily asymptomatic

But the goods news, is that you do cariovert, so the chance of an ablation working is much higher.

Be well

Ian

Hardjuice profile image
Hardjuice in reply toBeancounter

Hi Ian

I converted twice into normal Rythm a year apart but dropped out days later

I'm in persistent AF but EP

Says because I'm unsystematic he advices against an ablation

I'm ok off drugs done that one for six months felt good to be honest but HR was up and down but I felt ok

Although I'm on them now i have lower limb swellings because of diltyzem

I await a future fix

Freemans doing trials ATM on new kit I'm told

Beancounter profile image
BeancounterVolunteer

Actually had a further thought

Rate short term, rhythm long term would be a more accurate answer from me I suspect

Ian

beardy_chris profile image
beardy_chris

No simple reply, I'm afraid, Auntiejo. It depends! Everybody is different. The clinical data suggests that longevity is not hugely affected by the adoption of rate control or rhythm control strategies, if anything rate control is preferred. So it comes down to how you feel. In general, rhythm control drugs are more "serious"; they have more side effects. So, if you can tolerate odd rhythms, it is often better to employ rate control. If, on the other hand, you are highly symptomatic when out of normal sinus rhythm (NSR) then the priority is to get you back into NSR with cardioversion and/or rhythm control drugs.

So, how do you feel?

BobD profile image
BobDVolunteer

Professor Schilling in a lecture a few years ago stated that ALL treatment for AF was merely about improving quality of life. There is no difference in outcome between rate and rhythm control . Whatever makes you feel better then is the correct answer to you question.

CDreamer profile image
CDreamer

Hi Auntiejo - sorry that happened. I had an ablation in 2013 which made my AF a lot worse, although still paroxysmal not persistent but with very fast rate. The second eliminated all of the symptoms for over 2 years and which have now come back but I am not nearly as symptomatic.

I agree the priority is to try to get you back in sinus rhythm and as it was proved that you could, even for 24 hours, indicates it is possible.

Some good answers above but it is important to be clear of the purpose of your question and I am not.

What is more important........? - in what way? For quality of life?- that is individual. For life longevity? - I don't think there is enough data. For throwing a clot? - bit like throwing a dice. So many unknown, unknowns.

Best wishes

I'm also not sure on that question. I have permanent afib. But I've also been in a-flutter since last Sunday. My heart rate is sitting at 40bpm and going up and down every few minutes. Ive got low blood pressure on top of that, and I've had a funny turn with mine.

I was in a&e with this 3 weeks ago, but my cardiologist has said that there is nothing else they can do, due to my heart failure and that I need to learn to live with my symptoms.

All I know is I would rather the afib side effects than the flutter ones.

Auntiejo profile image
Auntiejo

Thanks everyone for your very help ful comments. Auntiejo

RichMert profile image
RichMert

'been in constant afib and flutter since my ablation on May 18th'. Whilst this does not sound encouraging given that you have had the ablation, surely it is too early to tell whether the scars have sufficiently healed to block the path ways. I suspect they will line you up for a 'redo' which should be easier for them if you are in constant AF.

Have you spoken to the surgeon or consultant?

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

AFib Terminology

Is the term Afib used to describe a specific instance when the heart is beating erratically? Or is...
ncernaa profile image

Afib and Gym

Anyone here who’s afib and still doing heavy in the gym. Do you have any special program that...
R0bbie profile image

Atrial flutter Not Afib

In 2010 i was told that I had Afib after catching it on a cardiocall machine (think that is what it...
chris45558 profile image

Best portable Afib detector

I'm needing a small at home contraption to tell me when I'm in Afib. My BP reader a Generation...
riffjack846 profile image

Flutter vs afib

I see a lot of comments Flutter cause afib. EP says I'm paroxysmal. I'm on flec 100x2, altenolol...
Grace4291 profile image

Moderation team

See all
KirstyC-Admin profile image
KirstyC-AdminAdministrator
Kelley-Admin profile image
Kelley-AdminAdministrator
jess-admin profile image
jess-adminAdministrator

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.