Hello,
I have my first EP appointment next July.
Last week my GP called me in sharpish on seeing the results of my 24-hour ECG tape, as It included a run of ventricular tachycardia, 11 beats long at 187 bpm.
The articles I have read say VT that last "more than a few seconds" are dangerous. I calculate that mine lasted about 3.5 seconds. (So thankful it wasn't longer!)
My GP straightaway sought advice from local cardiologist/cardiology team. She wanted to know if I needed to be seen sooner rather than wait til my first EP appointment (next July!), and she does not appear to have a reply yet.
My main question here is, can a GP get a consultant to bring an appointment forward for a patient if the symptoms warrant it?
I am assuming that she will ask my EP to see me sooner, but maybe she would involve local cardio instead.
My next question is, would it also be appropriate to have a non-EP cardiologist involved, to address the non-sustained VT?
I realise this is not an AF question in itself. However, my GP's 'informed guess' is that my heart troubles (the AF and now this) may have been caused by some ischaemic damage.
There is a cardio locally that my GP rates highly, but I am not sure if she has been able to stipulate him, as she just wants an answer fast.
One concern is, what if I am seen by a local ‘plumber' cardio who thinks they know about the electrics? What if they go beyond their knowledge/remit and muck things up?
From my brief reading on the subject, I can see that it is not always easy to see what is causing a NSVT, and what is its prognostic significance.
Right now I don't know if it's a mountain or a molehill!
So, y'know, jus t' cheer y'up like!
With many thanks for reading this,
Boombiddy