Extended Pluvicto or rechallenge - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

22,364 members28,123 posts

Extended Pluvicto or rechallenge

GP24 profile image
GP24
6 Replies

This study reports that a 177Lu-therapy like Pluvicto can be successfully extended beyond six cycles: jnm.snmjournals.org/content...

Conclusion: Extended therapy with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA is safe and has not been associated with increased grades 3–4 toxicity. Patient candidates for extended treatment experienced a favorable median survival of 31.3 mo from the first administration.

Written by
GP24 profile image
GP24
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
6 Replies
TeleGuy profile image
TeleGuy

I did two extra treatments after a four-year break, and they worked for me! I plan to post about it when I get a minute. I hopefully enhanced my expression with a month of darolutamide before the treatment.

cancervictim profile image
cancervictim in reply toTeleGuy

would like to hear about it. Had you already done darolutamide and restarted for a month?

TeleGuy profile image
TeleGuy in reply tocancervictim

Here's my story:

healthunlocked.com/advanced...

Thanks for getting me to actually write it down!

SViking profile image
SViking

on the eclipse trial from last summer my PSA at the start was 3.3 and then right before the fourth injection was .25 and right afterwards .3 continuing to rise. A PSMA scan showed that two of the three original spine tumors disappeared, but half of one remained. Several more bone mats have popped up since but were treated several times with SBRT.

Our assumption was that the LU – 77 did not kill any micro mets. So would it be useless to re-challenge? My bone marrow never recovered fully and I’m still at 10 on the hemoglobin. I also lost my left kidney along the way on an unrelated issue so I’m wondering about any toxicity issue.

Seasid profile image
Seasid in reply toSViking

Yes, Lu PSMA treatment could be very toxic to kidneys if you have a low volume cancer according to some German study from 2015 Bonn University. I believe that is why it was not given at Peter McCallum cancer centre in Melbourne Australia for low volume cancer. I am not a doctor just saying what I learnt here. Therefore if your cancer is still low volume maybe better not to do lutetium PSMA treatment. You should also make sure that your SUV Max on the PSMA pet ct scan is high enough.

Seasid profile image
Seasid

In order to be an effective treatment option a lutetium PSMA treatment. Your doctors should know more but just make sure that the treatment is a realistic option. Finally it is about your health.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Pluvicto Question

Just had third Pluvicto in fusion and Spect scan today and got results. Not sure what this means....
spencoid2 profile image

Pluvicto rechallenge failed

Husband successfully had Lut-177 in 2019 with the vision trial. This June he was fortunately...
CJ4J profile image

Chemo/Pluvicto or Clinical Trial?

I have stage 4, mcrpc with mets to pelvic lymph nodes and prostate. ADT (Firmagon and Zytiga) kept...
carguy profile image

Update: FDA grants Priority Review for 177Lu-PSMA-617 for patients with metastatic castration-resistant

FDA grants Priority Review for investigational targeted radioligand therapy 177Lu-PSMA-617 for...
GregHouston profile image

Extended lymphadenectomy or standard or not ?

Hello group and as the year start i wish to all peace and love around you. After my targeted biopsy...
Northcaptain profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.