Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis and ful... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

22,372 members28,135 posts

Ct scan of abdomen and pelvis and full body bone scan?

realtorjohn42 profile image
20 Replies

Hello,

I have been advised to get a ct scan of abdomen and pelvis with and without contrast, along with a full body bone scan prior to my next appointment with my urologist. PSA has been undetectable since completion 9/9/20 of image guided radiation to the prostate bed and lymph nodes with a 6 month Lupron shot 6/25/20. Prostatectomy was done 9/2015 Gleason 7 (3+4) Stage T2c, N0, MX.

My question is this necessary since my PSA has been undetectable since the radiation treatment? Urologist says this is standard of care....

Thank you for any input. I appreciate it.

John

Written by
realtorjohn42 profile image
realtorjohn42
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
20 Replies
Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

I have never heard of such a guideline from the AUA or ASTRO or NCCN.

realtorjohn42 profile image
realtorjohn42 in reply toTall_Allen

Thank you, Allen.

realtorjohn42 profile image
realtorjohn42 in reply toTall_Allen

I just got a call from my urologist office with word from the PA, that since my PSA has been undetectable for almost 4 years post Image guided radiation, I can wait on the Ct scan of abdomen/pelvis as well as the full body bone scan if I want to.

So I have just cancelled both of those appointments.

In your previous reply, what do the abbreviations stand for? I am not familiar with.

Any response is appreciated. Thank

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen in reply torealtorjohn42

AUA=American Urological Ass'n

ASTRO=American Society of Radiation Oncologists

NCCN= National Comprehensive Cancer Network

They write most guidelines that comprise the standard of care

realtorjohn42 profile image
realtorjohn42 in reply toTall_Allen

Thank you Allen, I will do some research and also follow up with my Dr that did the RP as well as my RO that did the image guided radiation to the prostate bed and lymph nodes.

leo2634 profile image
leo2634

I was diagnosed with almost the same stats as you I go for CT scan and bone scan every six months since 2018 . I would imagine it's recommended by our doctors to see if any progression has occurred. Never give up Never surrender Leo

realtorjohn42 profile image
realtorjohn42 in reply toleo2634

That is what they (nurse, PA, and Dr.) are saying.... I just haven't had to do it since radiation was complete, (last 5 years) and want to get some information from this group. I really appreciate your response! Thank you Leo

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n

His/her mortgage and car payments are due.........(Shoot, the mortgage payment issue is right up your alley (which is for sale)...

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n

Izzysdad profile image
Izzysdad

I’m guessing you might be in Canada? My Psa in undetectable but I still get the tests you mentioned every year. In my case they think/thought I might be a “low secretor”. As I understand it, that’s someone who’s cancer doesn’t produce much Psa. My MO said he didn’t want to “get caught” by not doing it. They didn’t push the issue but I figure they must feel there is value in doing the tests so I went. The results have been as expected. Nothing showing up on the scans.

realtorjohn42 profile image
realtorjohn42 in reply toIzzysdad

Thank you Izzysdad for your reply!

I just got a call from my urologist office with word from the PA, that since my PSA has been undetectable for almost 4 years post Image guided radiation, I can wait on the Ct scan of abdomen/pelvis as well as the full body bone scan if I want to.

So I have just cancelled both of those appointments.

I am trying to avoid any unnecessary testing that involves nuclear medicine injected in me.

Izzysdad profile image
Izzysdad in reply torealtorjohn42

I get what you say about avoiding radiation. I don’t know your age but your photo makes it appear you are a lot younger than me so I understand your concern.

realtorjohn42 profile image
realtorjohn42 in reply toIzzysdad

I am 67 and live in Fayetteville, Ar. I also get an annual CT scan of chest for my lungs.

Izzysdad profile image
Izzysdad in reply torealtorjohn42

Same here. Bone scan, chest, abdomen and pelvis ct.

CBRD profile image
CBRD

Hi, Lizzysdad, I know what you mean about being a "low secretor". My PSA had always been at .5 or .6 before I had my biopsy. My PSA then rose to .97, and actually went back down to .84, and at one time it went as low as .69, and my 4K Score Test was 8.2%, and I had a PYRADS 3.. Nevertheless, I was concerned so I insisted on a biopsy. It turned out I had G7 (4+3). I am currently on 6-month regiment of Orgovyx and ready to start proton beam radiation therapy in the next week or two. So, don't put all your eggs in a low PSA basket. I would take the more conservative route and follow-up with your scans just to make sure. As one doctor told me, there is such a thing as "stealth PCa' which could end up being deadly.

realtorjohn42 profile image
realtorjohn42 in reply toCBRD

Very good response CBRD. I appreciate it! Thank you!

CBRD profile image
CBRD

Hi, Izzysdad, I know what you mean about being a "low secretor". My PSA had always been at .5 or .6 before I had my biopsy. My PSA then rose to .97, and actually went back down to .84, and at one time it went as low as .69, and my 4K Score Test was 8.2%, and I had a PYRADS 3.. Nevertheless, I was concerned so I insisted on a biopsy. It turned out I had G7 (4+3). I am currently on 6-month regiment of Orgovyx and ready to start proton beam radiation therapy in the next week or two. So, don't put all your eggs in a low PSA basket. I would take the more conservative route and follow-up with your scans just to make sure. As one doctor told me, there is such a thing as "stealth PCa' which could end up being deadly.

NanoMRI profile image
NanoMRI

I learned to not give this beast time and obscurity. IMO, based on my experiences, with similar RP path and Oncotype DX as your's, and also needing salvage RT then ePLND, I support your urologists recommendation for imaging; although I would discuss different types. In fact, I support his being out ahead of common practice. ('SOC' in IMO is a misleading and risky term, especially as services range from barely acceptable to ultimate in care.

Could not determine from your bio and comments what PSA value you are relying on for 'undetectable' - a term I long ago discarded and also see as misleading and even deadly. Prior to my RP I chose to rely on <0.010 as best indicator; my RP nadir was 0.050 - we accepted cancer remained. My salvage RT was done at 0.11, nadir 0.075, missed again. Given that I then had six cancerous pelvic nodes removed by salvage extended pelvic lymph node surgery, at 0.11, there is no doubt remaining cancer is present well below 0.1.

Six years ago my salvage ePLND achieved nadir of <0.010, no ADT. After two years a very slow and stable rise began, been holding 0.03X range for past thirty-five months. Yes, ahead of 'guidelines', I have been doing annual imaging, mpMRI with PSMA, and blood biopsy. Sometimes I have to push, but this is my life, and my cancer indeed spread. (I am now considering fluciclovine or Mayo's Choline for in event my cancer is not PSMA avid).

My focus to not solely rely on PSA and to be out ahead of this beast with purpose to delay, if it comes to it, ADT and thereby CR chemo for as long as possible.

Hope this helps. All the best!

realtorjohn42 profile image
realtorjohn42 in reply toNanoMRI

Yes it does help. I believe my urologist is "being out ahead of common practice" My undetectable has been <0.14. I could ask for an absolute PSA test showing results to as low as .01 (as was done by my RP surgeon/urologist.) I feel sure my current urologist will require both scans with my 6 month follow up, later this year, after this weeks appointment. I am now scheduled to just doing bloodwork on the 15th for my appointment on the 20th. Thank you for your reply. Greatly appreciated!

NanoMRI profile image
NanoMRI in reply torealtorjohn42

there are disparities about what PSA value to rely on for best indictor, and some in this group seem to discount and even despise ultrasensitive testing. I find using tests that report to <0.010 critical to staying ahead of this beast .

realtorjohn42 profile image
realtorjohn42 in reply toNanoMRI

Yes indeed, NanoMRI!

I agree, and so I have designated for an ultrasensitive PSA test for tomorrows lab draw.

thank you for your reply!

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Whats the difference between the Axumin PET/CT and a regular bone scan and CT scan of pelvis and abdomen

Hello my dad was diagnosed in 2014 with Mets to bones and Gleason 9 he has been on Lupron every...
Olivia007 profile image

Bone scan/CT sensitivity?

My husband has only ever had regular nuclear bone scan and CT. PSA is now rising over 6 months from...
Proflac profile image

Second full body scan 2+ yrs later

CLINICAL HISTORY: Reason: eval metastasis from prostate cancer CREAT 1.15...
arete1105 profile image

Disturbing CT scan

Hi everyone I'm a first time poster. My husband was diagnosed Stage IV August 2017 at age 57....
Grace331 profile image

Should my advanced micrometastatic treatment be more aggressive

DX Feb 2014, Gleason 9, psa 10, 3tb. All scans have shown no metastatic involvement including...
Tnjw profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.