Interim Findings from MIRAGE Phase II... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

21,279 members26,571 posts

Interim Findings from MIRAGE Phase III Randomized Trial Signal Superiority of MRIdian® MRI-guidance in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT)

Scout4answers profile image
16 Replies

This looks like it is the new state of the art for PCa radiation.

Interim Findings from MIRAGE Phase III Randomized Trial Signal Superiority of MRIdian® MRI-guidance in Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Localized Prostate Cancer

Poster on Interim Trial Data Comparing MRI-Guided vs. CT-Guided SBRT Toxicities for Prostate Cancer to be Featured at American Society of Clinical Oncology GU Cancers Symposium

NEWS PROVIDED BY

ViewRay, Inc.

Feb 15, 2022, 06:30 ET

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

CLEVELAND, Feb. 15, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- ViewRay, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRAY) today announced that interim data from the single center Phase III randomized MIRAGE trial, led by UCLA, comparing MRIdian MRI-guided vs. CT-guided SBRT for localized prostate cancer, will be featured at the 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary (GU) Cancers Symposium, held February 17-19 in San Francisco. Interim analysis of the primary endpoint signaled superiority of MRIdian MRI-guided SBRT with a significant reduction in acute grade ≥2 GU toxicity in men receiving MRI-guided SBRT over those receiving CT-guided SBRT.

The poster, titled "Magnetic resonance imaging-guided versus computed tomography-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (MIRAGE): Interim analysis of a phase III randomized trial" and authored by Amar Kishan, MD., Associate Professor and Chief of the Genitourinary Oncology Service at UCLA, will be showcased on Thursday, February 17 from 11:30 AM PT to 1:00 PM PT as part of the Prostate Cancer poster session. Following the poster session, Dr. Kishan (@AmarUKishan) will host a LIVE Twitter Q&A to answer questions about the interim findings. Those interested can join the conversation and post their questions using #MIRAGEQ&A.

The interim analysis of data from 100 patients eligible for evaluation (51 in the CT group and 49 in the MRI group) showed a statistically significant reduction in acute grade ≥2 GU toxicity in men receiving MRI-guided SBRT (47.1 percent in the CT group vs. 22.4 percent in the MRI group) and a significant reduction in acute grade ≥2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity in men receiving MRI-guided SBRT (13.7 percent in the CT group vs. 0 percent in the MRI group). Acute grade ≥2 GU toxicity can include adverse events range from frequent, urgent, or painful urination to pelvis pain, bladder spasms, or blood in the urine. Acute grade ≥2 GI toxicity can include adverse events ranging from diarrhea, discharge, or rectal/abdominal pain to abdominal distention or obstruction.

Patient-reported outcomes were measured using the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) and Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26). Patient reported urinary and bowel function metrics were better preserved at the 1-month time point with MRI-guidance, though this difference dissipates at the 3-month time point, potentially due to management of side effects.

"Beyond a reduction in the standardized metric of physician-scored toxicity, we also saw differences in one-month patient-reported urinary and bowel function metrics favoring the MRI-guidance arm. These data are highly indicative of less radiation dose being delivered to sensitive structures, such as the bladder, urethra, and rectum, with MRI-guidance," said Dr. Kishan. "Potential explanations for the magnitude of these results can be attributed to the real-time tissue tracking of actual anatomy and automatic gating of beam delivery, which thereby allows for tighter contours and treatment of smaller volumes. The high dose regions are significantly smaller for patients receiving MRI-guided SBRT."

Given the large primary endpoint signal seen, the study protocol was amended to reduce the projected sample size from 300 to 154, requiring half the number of patients while still maintaining 89 percent power to demonstrate superiority. Accrual of the MIRAGE trial (NCT04384770) was completed as of October 2021 and a final analysis for the primary endpoint is anticipated in early 2022.

"While the final results are still being analyzed, it is evident from our interim analysis that the benefit provided by MRI-guidance over CT-guidance for the delivery of SBRT for localized prostate cancer is projected to be large enough that we were able to cut the projected size of our trial in half. In fact, by the time this interim analysis was done, we had already enrolled enough patients to close the trial successfully," said Dr. Kishan. "In anticipation of the highly positive result implied by this interim analysis, we have now shifted to routinely offering MRI-guided SBRT at UCLA."

The MRIdian system provides oncologists outstanding anatomical visualization through diagnostic-quality MR images and the ability to adapt a radiation therapy plan to the targeted cancer with the patient on the table. This combination allows physicians to define tight treatment margins to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure of vulnerable organs-at-risk and healthy tissue and allows the delivery of ablative radiation doses in five or fewer treatment sessions, without relying on implanted markers. By providing real-time continuous tracking of the target and organs-at-risk, MRIdian enables automatic gating of the radiation beam if the target moves outside the user-defined margins. This allows for delivery of the prescribed dose to the target, while sparing surrounding healthy tissue and critical structures, which results in minimizing toxicities typically associated with conventional radiation therapy.

Nearly 18,000 patients have been treated with MRIdian. Currently, 48 MRIdian systems are installed at hospitals around the world where they are used to treat a wide variety of solid tumors and are the focus of numerous ongoing research efforts. MRIdian has been the subject of hundreds of peer-reviewed publications, scientific meeting abstracts, and presentations. For a list of treatment centers, please visit: viewray.com/find-mridian-mr...

Disclaimer:

The opinions and clinical experiences discussed herein are specific to the featured physicians and are for information purposes only. Nothing in this material is intended to provide specific medical advice or to take the place of written law or regulations. Results of treatment presented in this press release are not indicative of typical or future results.

Safety Statement

The MRIdian Linac System is not appropriate for all patients, including those who are not candidates for magnetic resonance imaging. Radiation treatments may cause side effects that can vary depending on the part of the body being treated. The most frequent ones are typically temporary and may include, but are not limited to, irritation to the respiratory, digestive, urinary or reproductive systems; fatigue; nausea; skin irritation; and hair loss. In some patients, side effects can be severe. Treatment sessions may vary in complexity and duration. Radiation treatment is not appropriate for all cancers. You should discuss the potential for side effects and their severity as well as the benefits of radiation and magnetic resonance imaging with your doctor to make sure radiation treatment is right for you.

Conflicts of Interest: Amar Kishan, M.D. discloses research funding from the Department of Defense, the National Institutes of Health, the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Foundation, the Prostate Cancer Foundation, and the American Society for Radiation Oncology. He also discloses research support, not related to this study, from ViewRay, Inc. AUK discloses consulting fees from ViewRay, Inc. and Varian Medical Systems, Inc. Dr. Kishan also discloses low-value stock held in ViewRay Inc.

About ViewRay

ViewRay, Inc. (Nasdaq: VRAY) designs, manufactures, and markets the MRIdian® MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy System. MRIdian is built upon a proprietary high-definition MR imaging system designed from the ground up to address the unique challenges and clinical workflow for advanced radiation oncology. Unlike MR systems used in diagnostic radiology, MRIdian's high-definition MR was purpose-built to address specific challenges, including beam distortion, skin toxicity, and other concerns that potentially may arise when high magnetic fields interact with radiation beams. ViewRay and MRIdian are registered trademarks of ViewRay, Inc.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Statements in this press release that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include, among other things, anticipated future orders, ViewRay's financial guidance for the full year 2021, anticipated future operating and financial performance, treatment results, therapy adoption, innovation and the performance of the MRIdian systems. Actual results could differ from those projected in any forward-looking statements due to numerous factors. Such factors include, among others, the ability to commercialize MRIdian Linac System, demand for ViewRay's products, the ability to convert backlog into revenue, the timing of delivery of ViewRay's products, the timing, length, and severity of the recent COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic, including its impacts across our businesses on demand, operations and our global supply chains, the results and other uncertainties associated with clinical trials, the ability to raise the additional funding needed to continue to pursue ViewRay's business and product development plans, the inherent uncertainties associated with developing new products or technologies, competition in the industry in which ViewRay operates, and overall market conditions. For a further description of the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from those expressed in these forward-looking statements, as well as risks relating to ViewRay's business in general, see ViewRay's current and future reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 and its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, as updated periodically with the Company's other filings with the SEC. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this press release, and ViewRay assumes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements, except as required by law.

SOURCE ViewRay, Inc.

Written by
Scout4answers profile image
Scout4answers
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
16 Replies
cesces profile image
cesces

So can they get the same job done with less radiation?

Justfor_ profile image
Justfor_ in reply to cesces

No, better control leads to less spillage.

cesces profile image
cesces in reply to Justfor_

So then less "spillage" means less radiation?

Justfor_ profile image
Justfor_ in reply to cesces

Less spillage means less radiation to areas not intended to be irradiated. Targets receive the planned dose.

Jpl506 profile image
Jpl506

This was my treatment, my trial. 40 Gy to prostate no fiducals, no spaceoar, no rectal issues at all, minimal urinary issues. Back to baseline now.

Scout4answers profile image
Scout4answers in reply to Jpl506

Where did you have it done and how long ago?

Jpl506 profile image
Jpl506 in reply to Scout4answers

UCLA where the trial is being run. Kishan is my RO. Was completed June 2020. I was one of the first in the trial and randomized to ViewRay. It was a breeze, I slept in the machine mostly as I was being treated.

Scout4answers profile image
Scout4answers in reply to Jpl506

How many sessions? sexual side effects?

Jpl506 profile image
Jpl506 in reply to Scout4answers

5 sessions. I’ve never had sexual side effects even while on Lupron and Erleada. I’m dried up now but that’s ok all things considered.

Scout4answers profile image
Scout4answers in reply to Jpl506

That's very interesting, how far apart were the sessions?

Jpl506 profile image
Jpl506 in reply to Scout4answers

5 sessions in 10 days. Flew out to LA for one day of planning sessions a week ahead of the treatment then returned for two weeks.

Scout4answers profile image
Scout4answers in reply to Jpl506

He is on my list of ROs using View ray to consult. Thanks for the info

maley2711 profile image
maley2711 in reply to Jpl506

how do they keep the patient immobilized as far as any movement during a long session.....even with real-time MRI, minimizing any patient movement would be imperative I would think?

Jpl506 profile image
Jpl506 in reply to maley2711

It’s the same as for CT guided, they make a mold for your feet and lower legs and position you using tattoos. I slept because the suite was dimly lit and a nice breeze blows through the tube. The only problem I encountered was needing a full bladder going in, it’s off to the races as soon as they get you out.

treedown profile image
treedown

Looks like a press release. Appears the trial was for localized pc. Also the comparison was against conventional radiation therapy. Isn't that 2D? It doesn't really specify. Anyway, time will tell if it offers real benefits. Looks like more competition to proton which hasn't proven itself superior for while pelvic yet.

Thanks. I added this info.

1. Short RT and ADT for high risk PCa

a. Interim results of AASUR: A single arm, multi-center phase 2 trial of apalutamide (A) + abiraterone acetate + prednisone (AA+P) + leuprolide with stereotactic ultra-hypofractionated radiation (UHRT) in very high risk (VHR), node negative (N0) prostate cancer (PCa). | Journal of Clinical Oncology ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.120...

b. prostatecancerinfolink.net/...

2. eSRT improves outcomes following RP if started when PSA is between 0.2 and 0.5 ng/ml renalandurologynews.com/hom...

3. Whole-pelvic radiation therapy for high-risk patients prostatecancerinfolink.net/...

4. ADT following radiation might be harmful for men with PSA ≤0.6 going into RT: Long-term hormone therapy increases mortality risk for men with low PSA levels after prostate surgery - American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) - American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) astro.org/News-and-Publicat...

5. eSRT superior to ART (in high-risk patients the advice is inverted, and ART has been found to be superior to eSRT)

a. urotoday.com/conference-hig...

b. scmp.com/lifestyle/health-w...

c. prostatecancer.news/2019/09...

6. SpaceOAR prevents some side effects spaceoar.com/

7. Hydrogel Spacer Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pivotal Trial: Dosimetric and Clinical Effects of Perirectal Spacer Application in Men Undergoing Prostate Image Guided Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy – PubMed pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/260...

8. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided versus computed tomography-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (MIRAGE): Interim analysis of a phase III randomized trial. | Journal of Clinical Oncology ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.120...

9. ViewRay - MRIdian MRI-Guided Linac viewray.com/find-mridian-mr...

10. TRT following radiation ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/a...

11. ADT preceding RT sensitizes PCa ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/a...

12. BAT with Radiation pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/268...

13. Green tea/EGCG with Radiation cancer.gov/about-cancer/tre...

14. Curcumin with Radiation ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/a...

15. Fasting

a. osher.ucsf.edu/patient-care...

b. news.usc.edu/41212/fasting-...

c. acsjournals.onlinelibrary.w...

d. cancercenter.com/community/...

e. mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/23/91...

f. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/a...

g. link.springer.com/article/1...

h. Note: my MO verified this.

16. Keto karger.com/Article/FullText...

17. Rapamycin bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.c...

18. Statins

a. sciencedaily.com/releases/2...

b. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/273...

c. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/a...

19. Abiraterone Acetate pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/309...

20. Lovastatin

a. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/183...

b. Note: my MO verified this.

21. HCG tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10....

22. Losartan pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/268...

23. The melatonin immunomodulatory actions in radiotherapy – PMC ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/a...

24. Melatonin as a Radio-Sensitizer in Cancer - PMC ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/a...

25. ADT with Radiation

a. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show...

b. renalandurologynews.com/hom...

c. prostatecancerinfolink.net/...

d. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show...

e. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/a...

26. Frank, Steven J. “The Myths and Facts About Prostate Brachytherapy.” September 2021 grandroundsinurology.com/th...

27. 10-year survival after RT/ADT or RT/RP (comparing overall mortality (PCa, cardiac, etc) to PCa mortality for RT/ADT vs. RT/RP) mskcc.org/clinical-updates/...

28. Two years Bicalutamide clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show...

29. Statins lower intracellular testosterone

a. healio.com/news/endocrinolo...

b. Note: my MO verified this.

30. Brief, intense radiation and hormone therapy for very high-risk PCa

a. prostatecancerinfolink.net/...

b. meetinglibrary.asco.org/rec...

31. Radiation kills CTCs clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show...

32. Prazosin Effects of prazosin + radiation therapy on recurrence-free survival

33. Researching radiation

a. cancer.gov/research/infrast...

b. nccn.org/patientresources/p...

You may also like...

MRIdian/ViewRay compared to Ethos/Varian

it for 20 treatment plans (I'm not eligible for 5 treatment SBRT on ViewRay due to toxicity to...

Radiation - View Ray- Kishan

Dr. Kishan is the head of the Prostate Radiation Oncology Dept., He specializes in Prostates. He...

Please advise about treatment

the prostate? Do we need any treatment of the prostate? My Dad already had 6 weeks of radiation for...

6 months after MRI Guided SBRT at MSK

Surveillance, my cancer progressed to GL 4+3 and I decided to have MRI Guided SBRT in August at...

initial treatment Locally advanced combo therapy results compared

guidelines for cancer treatment. It was surprising to see only 29 percent of patients received the...