Why not brachytherapy for PCa infecte... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

21,321 members26,637 posts

Why not brachytherapy for PCa infected lymph nodes? The study below was not for PCa but was fairly successful.

Graham49 profile image
3 Replies

Front. Oncol., 19 February 2021 | doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.5...

CT-Guided Pelvic Lymph Nodal Brachytherapy

Hiroaki Kunogi1*, I-Chow Hsu2, Nanae Yamaguchi1, Soshi Kusunoki3, Keiko Nakagawa4, Yayoi Sugimori3, Kazunari Fujino3, Yasuhisa Terao3, Daiki Ogishima3, Ryoichi Yoshimura4 and Keisuke Sasai1

1Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan

2Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States

3Department of Gynecology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan

4Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Medical Dental University, Tokyo, Japan

Purpose: This is a report of our initial experience using computed tomography (CT)-guided interstitial high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy to treat bulky pelvic nodal metastases as a part of definitive radiotherapy.

Material and methods: Between February 2015 and April 2019, 14 cervical/endometrial cancer patients presenting with bulky pelvic node(s) underwent nodal interstitial brachytherapy boost in our institution. In total, 17 nodes were treated. The median maximum diameters of the positive nodes at the time of diagnosis and at the first nodal implant were 25 mm (range: 10–65 mm) and 16 mm (range: 9–51 mm), respectively. Dosimetry data of the lymph nodal target volume and small bowel were collected and compared using the paired-sample t-test. Treatment-related toxicities were classified using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.

Results: The median follow-up time for all patients was 26 months. Local recurrence in pelvic nodes occurred in one patient (7%) after 16 months. One patient experienced grade 3 bladder bleeding, and one patient experienced grade 2 pubic bone fracture. No patient had grade 2 or greater gastrointestinal toxicity. In the dosimetric analysis, the mean nodal brachytherapy D90% in terms of the total equivalent dose of 2 Gy (EQD2) was 65.6 Gyαβ10. The mean small bowel dose (SBD)0.1cc and SBD1cc in terms of the total EQD2 were 60.4 and 56.5 Gyαβ3, respectively. Nodal D90% was significantly higher in terms of the total EQD2 than the SBD0.1cc (p = 0.003) and SBD1cc (p < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier 2-year pelvic control estimate was 90%.

Conclusions: CT-guided interstitial HDR pelvic nodal brachytherapy appears to be well tolerated with excellent local control in cervical or endometrial cancer patients with bulky pelvic nodes. This approach may offer a useful therapeutic option for unresected bulky pelvic nodes.

Written by
Graham49 profile image
Graham49
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
3 Replies
cesces profile image
cesces

I think that they bathe the entire pelvis with radiation for prostate cancer, not just the nodes.

Graham49 profile image
Graham49 in reply to cesces

I was thinking more of oligo metastases, especially those lymph nodes close to an organ. I have got two close to my transplanted kidney.

tango65 profile image
tango65

I believe they can do boost of radiotherapy to nodes and the cancer in the prostate using SBRT which is not an invasive procedure.

You may also like...

Metastatic Lymph Node, Recurrent PCa

have recommended whole pelvic IMRT including lymph nodes and SBRT to avid node along with 6 months...

Need Help Interpreting My PSMA/PET SCAN

F-18 PYL avid node in the left mid to low lateral pelvic region quite suspicious for nodal...

PSMA PET/CT is not very good; it's just the best that is widely available

PET/CT only detects 40% of the cancerous pelvic lymph nodes (LNs) that are detectable and about half

2018 ASTRO: SPPORT Trial: ADT With or Without Pelvic Lymph Node Radiation in Prostate Cancer

Alan Pollack, MD, PhD, Chair of Radiation Oncology at the University of Miami and Deputy Director of