Hello - I had my prostate removed in 2010 due to discovery of prostate cancer - stage 3. For the next 9 years my PSA under 1 - IN 2019 PSA was 1.0
Now this year (August, 2021) my PSA shows 2.3. My Urologist thinks its recurrence of PC - so he had me take a bone scan and a CT scan. Both came back Negative. Now a different Urologist wants me to take a PSMA PET scan. He mentioned radiation treatments as a possible treatment should the PSMA PET scan disclosed anything. He also mentioned Hormone injection IF its worse than expected. I have read and been told by many people that there is also the possibility the 2.3 PSA is NOT a reflection of prostate cancer and could be from a bladder infection etc. IM going in for a urine test next week. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Many thanks.
Written by
coachmark
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Since you do not have prostate, the PSA may not be coming from a bladder infection and associated prostatitis.
I believe a PSMA PET/CT is a great idea. Bone scan and CT scans are notorious for the false negatives when compare with the PSMA PET/CTs.
The PSMA PET/CT may show where the PSMA is coming which could be from limph nodes in the pelvis and the correct treatment may be curative.
It may also show distant metastases which may require systemic treatment. IMO bone scan and CT scans are studies from the past and it should not be used to stage a patient with BCR.
"I have read and been told by many people that there is also the possibility the 2.3 PSA is NOT a reflection of prostate cancer and could be from a bladder infection etc. " They are wrong. The prostate and prostate metastases are the only significant sources of PSA. UTIs only increase PSA when there is a prostate - yours was surgically removed.
I'm not TA - but I'd have to question where it might be treated? Are you talking ADT or systemic treatment? If you can't see it with the current tests that have been done it would be awfully hard to target it for radiation. And he has doubled PSA - in 2 years from under 1 to 2.3. For a guy without a prostate that's actually a significant number, and one where treatment is usually indicated.
The purpose is not for targeting, the purpose is to rule out distant metastases. If it shows cancer within the prostate bed or pelvic lymph nodes, but none apart from that, they can receive a little extra dose.
The PSMA PET scan (or Axumin) is necessary to rule out distant metastases. If there are distant metastases, there is no point in undergoing salvage radiation.
Or c11 Choline that Mayo in Rochester has had for over 7 years. It is also at two other facilities, one in Decatur IL and one out East. Definitely found husbands distant lymph Mets andcwas uded to direct treatment. They also have the PSMA.
It is inferior (lower sensitivity) than either PSMA or Axumin. I don't see a role for it, although Mayo will no doubt keep pushing it to recoup its investment.
I think you got great advice in the previous comments. I can't see a reason for not doing a PSMA PET/CT.
At best it shows nothing and you'll be relieved and can go back to monitoring your PSA. There may still be some recurrent PCA but it's not going to kill you right now. At worst - it will show where some PCA has recurred and it can be treated before it gets out of control. I don't see a downside unless your insurance won't pay for it.
I'd stick with the urologist who suggested the scan. I think he's forward-looking and concerned for your health.
Many thanks Don - im going to do what the new Urologist suggested - and that is get the PET scan - etc = im waiting for Kaiser to call me to schedule it - (they recently went on strike so it might take extra time for them to schedule it) Im kind of fortunate in that the new Urologist i have is also the same doctor who operated on me 10 years and removed my prostate. (I think that is a good thing?) LOL - Maybe not? He was cool and actually apologized to me and told me IF he missed taking out all of the cancer 10 years ago - he was sorry) Also - no problem with insurance paying for it - I have Kaiser Senior Advantage - they handle it)
As I'm with Kaiser, does your Kaiser region now offer PSMA PET? Or Axumin scan? Now aware that they are available here in the NW region. Perhaps Kaiser will refer you out to another institution for such a scan?
Honestly - i "assume" they have it - why else would my Urologist tell me i need PET scan? Im assuming they have it - if i dont hear from them this coming week i will call them for follow-up. Thanks
Hi, when I was down in Orange County, CA, Kaiser had did several Axumin scans and it was in a huge trailer in the back of the East Anaheim Kaiser megacomplex.Had another Axumin scan post Docetaxel rechallenge and this was done via Kern Radiology in Bakersfield, CA.
Possibly Kaiser has a contracted Radiology group that does it in your area.
Hey Maley - FYI - in answer to your comments and quesions regarding whether or not Kaiser does offer a PMSA PET scan - etc - they utilize a Mobile Unit -- where they bring in a mobile unit 2 times a week. Thats what ill be using.
Yes, get the Pet scan. Before Bill had surg his MRI was neg. however found in pelvic lymphs at surg.. PSA didn’t go below 3 after. Went to Mayo in Rochester where c11 choline pet found in lymph in chest area. This was 6 years ago. They now have the PSMA and have for a few years, under research and but continue to use both. Your PSA is high enough where it should show up with accuracy. Go for it.
You can't find micromeths with the pet scan. The safest way is start with firmagon injections (ADT) and in 2 months when you are deeply castrated start with docetaxel chemotherapy. 6 cycles. Then you can think about the rest.
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.