Confused by PSA tests -- Husband's PS... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

22,352 members28,110 posts

Confused by PSA tests -- Husband's PSA for past 3 yrs: <0.1; now (8/10/19) reported 0.05.

Lyubov profile image
23 Replies

Recently moved & hubby has new urologist, new testing lab, etc. It seems a different type of PSA test was just done with the report of PSA 0.05. Would this be the same as 0.5 using previous testing method & laboratory? CONCERNED -- this then means more than doubling since test in early March 2019. Anyone out there, please help me understand. He does see urologist tomorrow, just so worried now. I'm also ill with LCa & other issues.

Written by
Lyubov profile image
Lyubov
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
23 Replies
Magnus1964 profile image
Magnus1964

You have to allow for different labs showing different results. Wait for a couple more tests from the new lab.

Moving is stressful which could account for an increase in PSA.

tom67inMA profile image
tom67inMA

Different labs/tests have different cutoffs for what is considered "undetectable". 0.05 is still <0.1, he may have been at 0.05 for the last three years.

A lot of major medical centers don't show results lower than <0.1. Strangely the VA center I test at shows to the 2nd decimal. Not to worry. <0.1 could be 0.07, 0.05, 0.02, etc.

Lyubov profile image
Lyubov

Thank you so much all of you who've responded. Your explanations are highly reassuring. I did think labs could make a difference. And in addition to stress of moving, I had lung surgery in May & totaled our car last month! So stress has been rather huge. He'll see urologist tomorrow & we now can hope for further reassurance. With much gratitude, Wreen

ucladany profile image
ucladany in reply toLyubov

You are a strong woman. Both you and your husband are in my prayers.

LearnAll profile image
LearnAll

I am aware of at least two different methods PSA is tested by different labs. Quest lab uses Siemens method which comes about 20% lower than the standard bennet method. Check which method your new lab is using.

Shooter1 profile image
Shooter1

Standard seems to be only one decimal---I have insisted on uPSA test of 3 decimals to follow trend....last year and a half trend has been no change at 0.130 area +- .0100. (0,120-0.140) Little bumps can be ignored unless trend up for 3 or more tests. 0.05 is great!!

Tall_Allen profile image
Tall_Allen

No, 0.05 is one tenth of 0.5. 0.05 is less than ("<") 0.1. There has been no change.

Lyubov profile image
Lyubov in reply toTall_Allen

Thanks a million, Tall_Allen, for explaining this so clearly! I really trust your responses -- I read many of them & it's obvious that you are highly knowledgeable. I'll drop a post asap too after we see the uro tomorrow. Now it's off to the gym to keep up with the exercise commitments we've made!

monte1111 profile image
monte1111 in reply toLyubov

Sounds like everything is going well. I noticed you said off to the gym. Are you on a camel now? Best of luck and wishes.

Lyubov profile image
Lyubov in reply tomonte1111

Saw urologist today. He confirmed <0.05 is same as <0.1, thus hubby still "NED" -- no evidence of disease!

Don’t take your eye off of the ball. Undetectable or <0.1 is all that matters. Ultra sensitive or uPSA tests have a tendency it create needless worry.....

GD

larry_dammit profile image
larry_dammit

Sounds like that undetectable on both counts. Great numbers

Lyubov profile image
Lyubov

Thanks, you kind guys! See urologist later this a.m. I'll post afterwards.

DoggieDaddy profile image
DoggieDaddy

Find out whether their equipment has been recalculated and/or whether the PSA Assay is different from the previous Assay; might also be good to look into whether an Ultra-Sensitive Assay was used.

Lyubov profile image
Lyubov in reply toDoggieDaddy

Just back from urologist. It was a different type of test & <0.05 is same as <0.1, nondetectable. Very good news!

Lyubov profile image
Lyubov

Thanks again to all who responded. The urologist said <0.05 is the same as <0.1; different type of testing measurement used. Hubby has a new medical facility because we moved away from previous area. At any rate, we're very happy that he's still "NED" (no evidence of disease).

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n

0.5 or 5.0 is extremely important when your measuring sizes in inches.

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n Wednesday 08/14/2019 6:05 PM EDT

Lyubov profile image
Lyubov in reply toj-o-h-n

LOL!!

Muffin2019 profile image
Muffin2019

Mine went from .6 to 1.8,1.6 and settled at 1.9. I am on lupron every 3 months , the oncologist was not that concerned until it gets to 4 or above, scans showed healing of bone mets and no new lesions so I will just live on. Just got some meds for the hot flashes, sucks during the summer. He thinks it has reached what they call nadir.

Lyubov profile image
Lyubov in reply toMuffin2019

So sorry you have those bad side effects. Hope the meds help with the hot flashes.

Best of luck to you!

Patrick-Turner profile image
Patrick-Turner

Stop worrying. If Psa was < 0.1, maybe your man was fine.

If they now can now measure 0.05 then this is half the 0.1 level.

But 0.5 would be a worry, because its 5 times higher than 0.1.

Figures and shiggers can be so confusing to many folks who don't

understand numbers and decimal points. In Australia we measure down to 0.01. And I have had countless Psa tests, and never had a false or wrong measurement.

Patrick Turner.

Lyubov profile image
Lyubov

Thank you, Patrick. We saw urologist today & he confirmed this is good.

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Sedentary 75 year old

New here, great to read posts. Following 3 years treatment by GP for BPH with finasteride, stopped...
Dondodoc profile image

Still confused about PSA and Testosterone testing

I have been reading posts here for some time and there seems to be a split between those who only...
Mgtd profile image

New to site- need advice

New to site- need advice. Husband RP 2005, Gleason 9. TRiple Hormone Therapy 2008, Zytiga 2012,...
Julson profile image

New to Group

I was diagnosed in May 2013 with Prostate cancer. PSA was 9 and Gleesons was 7. I was 63yo. The...
thevvy profile image

Surgery then cannabis

Pre-surgery PSA and Gleason score 8.6 and 3+4. RALP July 2009, pathology Gleason score 4+3 with...

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.