MO Recomendation At Moffitt Cancer Ce... - Advanced Prostate...

Advanced Prostate Cancer

22,355 members28,110 posts

MO Recomendation At Moffitt Cancer Center

6357axbz profile image
7 Replies

Can anyone recommendation a prostate cancer oncologist at Moffitt?

Thank-you

Written by
6357axbz profile image
6357axbz
To view profiles and participate in discussions please or .
Read more about...
7 Replies
j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n

This is a post from user Balsam01 four months ago: I did a search in HealthUnlocked and the name I found was a Dr. Robert Gatenby but he is a RO not a MO. Maybe contacting him could lead you to a good MO. SEE ORIGINAL POST BELOW. (hope this helps)

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n Monday 07/08/2019 7:56 PM DST

Intermittent vs. Continuous ADT Treatment--Intriguing Research from State of the Science Report

Balsam01

Balsam01•

4 months ago•8 Replies

I was asked to post this by George71--very interesting stuff especially the material about intermittent use of two treatments.

Cancer Therapy, Adapting to Change the Game

Robert Gatenby, MD

The Moffitt Cancer Center

•Cancer is often described as a disease of the genes. While cancer cells clearly accumulate genetic alterations that collectively confer continued proliferation, resistance to normal cell death signals, and the ability to metastasize, cancer cells are imbedded in a temporally and spatially variable tissue ecosystem which ultimately selects the phenotypic properties (and their genotypic counterparts) that are most fit.

•Thus, cancer is more than a disease of the genes. It is a complex, dynamic system with multiple non-linear interactions. Understanding these non-linear interactions will improve our ability to predict the outcomes of treatments that perturb a complex dynamic system and develop improved treatments.

•These complexities can be addressed by recruiting mathematicians and evolutionary biologists to the study of cancer, and linking them with clinicians, to develop theoretical understandings of the dynamics of cancer evolution in cancer treatment. This integrated

State of the Science Report | 25th Annual PCF Scientific Retreat 52

research approach is being taken through the Integrated Mathematical Oncology (IMO) Department and the Cancer Biology and Evolution (CBE) program at the Moffitt Cancer Center.

•Dr. Robert Gatenby discussed studies to integrate evolutionary dynamics into prostate cancer therapy.

•Currently, oncology research focuses on developing new drugs which are typically used at “maximum tolerated doses” (MTDs). MTD is the highest concentration of a drug that patients can tolerate without experiencing unacceptable side effects.

•The goal of using cancer drugs at maximum tolerated dose levels, is to kill as many cancer cells as possible. However, this treatment approach typically results in selection for treatment-resistant cancer cells, which eventually proliferate, repopulate the tumor, and cause disease progression.

•Because of the diversity of cancer cells (mutations and gene expression patterns can be different in each cell) and the diversity of the tumor microenvironment (for instance, some areas of the tumor are more accessible to therapy than others), drug-resistant cells are often present prior to therapy, and are selected for by the treatment.

•The field of evolutionary biology has found that genes which are not necessary are often a burden to an organism and will be lost over time. For instance, Charles Darwin discovered a species of fish that live in dark underwater caves and had evolved to loose eyes.

•Similarly, resistance to therapy may be a burden to a cancer cell when it is not necessary because it requires expenditure of resources for synthesis, maintenance, and operation of the molecular machinery of resistance. While the resource costs are exceeded by the corresponding benefit during treatment, they are wasted when therapy is not present. Thus, in the absence of treatment, treatment-resistant cells may be less fit and competitive compared with treatment-sensitive cells.

•These principles led to the hypothesis that treatment of cancer with lower or less frequent doses of cytotoxic drugs may be more effective in the long term, as populations of chemotherapy-sensitive cells would be maintained and would suppress the growth of chemotherapy-resistant cells when the treatment is removed. In this treatment approach, the goal is to maintain a steady-state tumor burden. Lower doses of drug would also be less toxic to patients.

•An “adaptive therapy” treatment approach was tested in animal models, in which the chemotherapy dose was continuously modified to maintain a stable tumor volume. Mice with exponentially growing tumors were initially given chemotherapy frequently, with progressively lower doses. When the tumor ceased to grow exponentially, reaching a “plateau,” tumor control was maintained using low doses of chemotherapy. In this study, treatment could be discontinued for long periods of time (months) in 67% of the mice, and tumor control was maintained indefinitely in 87% of the mice.

•Androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapy, which acts to block the production or action of testosterone, is a primary treatment for advanced prostate cancer, and is typically given continuously until the tumor develops resistance and disease progression occurs.

Unfortunately, treatment resistance to AR-targeted therapy is common, and evolves through various mechanisms, including via tumor cells gaining the ability to produce their own testosterone.

53 State of the Science Report | 25th Annual PCF Scientific Retreat

•An adaptive therapy trial was initiated to test intermittent administration of abiraterone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Abiraterone is a standard-of-care AR-targeted treatment for mCRPC that is typically given continually until disease progression.

•In the adaptive therapy trial, patients were given abiraterone until PSA levels dropped by

≥50%, at which time abiraterone treatment was discontinued. This was hypothesized to allow treatment sensitive cells to repopulate the tumor and suppress growth of treatmentresistant cells. Abiraterone was administered again when a patient’s PSA level returned to the pre-treatment level (one cycle), and then withdrawn when the PSA was reduced to 50% of the pretreatment value. Mathematical models predicted that tumor control with this approach could be maintained for 2 to 20 cycles of treatment.

•In preliminary analysis of the first 18 patients enrolled on this trial, cycle lengths (length of time between treatments) ranged from 4 months to 1.5 years (Figure). The earliest disease recurrence in a patient was observed after 2 cycles. The longest survivors are still under treatment after 12 cycles (~4 years). Thus far, four patients have experienced PSA and radiographic progression (at 12, 27, 30, and 32 months). However, the median time to progression for the treatment cohort has not yet been reached.

•These results were compared with a group of mCRPC patients contemporaneously treated with abiraterone in the continuous, standard-of-care manner (Figure). All 16 of the patients in the continuous abiraterone group have progressed, with a median time to radiographic progression of 15 months.

•Based on these results, an adaptive therapy approach for abiraterone in mCRPC appears promising, although a randomized trial comparing these treatment approaches is necessary to validate the superiority of one approach over the other. Notably, on average, patients treated on the adaptive therapy trial received less than half the cumulative dose of abiraterone as patients being treated continuously.

•Data from the patients being treated on this trial is now being used to generate mathematical models to improve the timing and duration of therapy. For instance, simulations using one patient’s data predicted that if abiraterone had been withdrawn when PSA reached 80% of the pre-treatment value (instead of 50%), cycle times would have been shorter but tumor control could have been maintained for almost twice the length of time.

•Mathematical simulations also predict that if an adaptive therapy approach is used with two drugs instead of one (abiraterone and docetaxel), time to disease progression could be increased four-fold.

•Based on these types of evolutionary principles and math models, Moffitt Cancer Center has opened four new adaptive therapy trials in several cancer types, including a trial testing firstline androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer.

State of the Science Report | 25th Annual PCF Scientific Retreat 54

Figure: Preliminary analysis of treatment lengths, cycles, and disease progression in mCRPC patients enrolled on a trial testing adaptive therapy with abiraterone (top) versus a group of mCRPC patients contemporaneously treated with abiraterone continuously (standard-of-care, SOC; bottom).

55 State of the Science Report | 25th Annual PCF Scientific Retre

6357axbz profile image
6357axbz in reply toj-o-h-n

Thank you

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n in reply to6357axbz

Here's another one I just saw (from today) user WXYZ123

Maybe you can chat with the user and get an opinion.

HOPE THIS HELPS.

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n Monday 07/08/2019 8:21 PM DST

WXYZ123•

a day ago•3 Replies

Seems like whatever was going on has passed.

John woke up with normal temperature and no spiking happening today. Previous days it was on its way up by noon.

Thanks for all your kind responses. We will see Dr Tagawa Tuesday and probably also talk to Dr Sweeney (Dana Farber) Monday

Maybe they can shed light on the mystery

jfoesq profile image
jfoesq in reply toj-o-h-n

If I understand what was presented, it appears from th study of some mCRPC patients, that the INTERMITTENT use of Zytiga (I.e. aberaterone, aka Abi) , lead to better results than those who took it continuously. Is that right?

And- they were also on smaller doses?

That sounds like pretty good news.

Looking forward to a study with more patients.....

j-o-h-n profile image
j-o-h-n in reply tojfoesq

Sorry, but those two posts above were quotes from two other users. After some research I was just trying to answer the question by user: 6357axbz

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

6357axbz

Can anyone recommendation a prostate cancer oncologist at Moffitt?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Good Luck, Good Health and Good Humor.

j-o-h-n Tuesday 07/09/2019 12:10 AM DST

BaliDream profile image
BaliDream

My MO at Moffitt is Dr. Jingsong Zhang....been seeing him since I was diagnosed in Feb. 2018 with Stage 4 PC/bone....he’s on top of things and has been a great asset in my treatment.

6357axbz profile image
6357axbz in reply toBaliDream

Thank-you BD

Not what you're looking for?

You may also like...

Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa FL

Any recommendations for a good doctor at Moffitt?
Joey40 profile image

MO recommendations at Mayo, Moffitt?

Hello - After 7 months of ADT (Lupron/abi) my MOs are not offering anything but continuation until...
jackwfrench profile image

Dattoli Cancer Center Sarasota

Question as to next steps. My details are up to date in bio and I was undetectable until last week...

MO at MD Anderson

Going to MD Anderson. Any suggestions for MO and RO ? PSA is 0.14 after 2.3 years after radical...
Davidl3940 profile image

Question about Cancer Center and Doctor

Hi all, I was wondering if anyone has gone to Yale New Haven cancer center for prostate cancer...
dagreer profile image

Moderation team

Bethishere profile image
BethishereAdministrator
Number6 profile image
Number6Administrator
Darryl profile image
DarrylPartner

Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.

Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.