Not sure if really sensitive, but after 2 PSMA PET CT, 1 biopsy and now a very detailed mri (waiting results, very long inside mri for about 1,5 hours), doctor still don't know if my husband has or not bone metastasis....
So I am trying to see if ALP numbers are related. His numbers are in the norm, and CRP 0.2. Calcium score also normal.
Thanks for CRP, I think our alternative medicine is helping a lot (and thanks for additional hints!!!).
Alk Phos last one was 82 U/l (being the normal range 38-126 in this lab), one year ago at DX about the same, just in july it was 64 (when also PSA declined a lot). Bone ALP is 32.3 microg/l (on the higher end of normal range).
The point is the idea to target the bones with radiation not knowing if there are mets is not so great... specially the one in the spine (near heart). But if oligo bone mets the aggressive treatment idea of radiation + ADT + mets radiation could give him some chances...
• in reply to
And now I read that Paget's disease also causes higher ALP.... complicated
He had 1 biopsy to the biggest point on the ilium, but they did not find anything. It seems it is very difficult to hit and also there is always a 30% chance of false negative...
if he begins with ADT and points don't shrink on PSMA it could mean they are not mets, that's your idea? So in this case radiation to this points would not be necessary. But is this a sure enough way to know if the points are mets or not?
That's the way it's usually assessed. Since they are PSMA avid, and there is bone overgrowth on CT, they should respond to hormone therapy if they are prostate cancer. But PSMA false positives are very rare in bone.
seems a logical approach. Let's see. But from literature and speaking to doctors there are more than just rare cases of false positives in bone, at least here in Switzerland where PSMA is already standard. They are not sure probably because of low signal and it did not advance over almost a year, PSA when detected was under 20 and biopsy was negative.
Would the response to hormone therapy in case of mets be quite fast, so that in let's say 2 months when radiation to mets would begin, we would know more?
We will have a second opinion here in Switzerland , this time in the french part (the German doctors are already here, because they prefer to work here for lots of reasons... and in Zürich they were the first to have all these new machines). I did not say it's common, but there are cases.... you know, inflammation, or Paget's disease there are lots of possible causes for false positives. But I hope that after 2 PSMA PET CT and now RMI they will come to a conclusion.
I will keep you updated. Thanks for your advice. Sure, Germany still has doctors working there :)), but here we have a real invasion of them (very appreciated, since I prefer to speak German to Swiss German, that is difficult to understand, and they are very qualified) If really needed we can go to Freiburg, but I don't think necessary. Where Germany has much more to offer is in alternative treatment clinics.
It is the same basis in New Zealand U/I.Numbers are low from what I read on this Forum and so far I am not getting answers from M.O I envy you the alternatives you have in Germany ?
I am not sure if ALK numbers are enough sensitive, but they are somehow related. I don't know which scan you did, and what therapy you are taking, since with therapy ALP can go down.
The point is to be sure about the mets, since scans can also give false positives, because the mets influences a lot the choice of therapy.
It was rising from may to September of 2018 the high was in September. Thats when i started zytiga.it was down to 121 in February 2019. And in June it was 106.
My alkaline phosphatase was approaching 1000 after diagnosis with many bone mets. Started dropping on Eligard, and dropped faster and further on docetaxel, now in the upper 40s. Still have pain in back and ribs and hoping those low numbers mean it's healing pain.
Yes, it did take months, and like my PSA there was a spike after diagnosis. Since that original reply months ago, it's fallen even further, now in the upper 30s, just below the normal range, and a couple points below where it used to be before cancer.
Yes, but just a little bit. After reading the studies showing a modest survival benefit for Zometa + Celebrex (which presumably apply to Xgeva + Celebrex), I got a prescription for Celebrex which got rid of most of my remaining pain. Most of what's left appears to be a side effect of the Xgeva actually.
To put may pain in perspective, I'm back to work now and still running over 20 miles a week, so at worst it's been an annoyance.
Ya for a while I was getting bone specific Alka Phos tested which was in normal range, my local oncologist said he is comfortable with testing just total Alka Phos because if bone Alka Phos was high then regular Alka Phos would be elevated too. Then he would do the more specific AP test. This made sense since my other numbers were good.
My husband’s ALP was close to 400 at DX and went down to low normal in a few months on ADT. We have new bone scan and tests this coming week. His PSA is rising while off of Lupron so we will see what’s next.
My ALP was 110 IU/L at its peak and when diagnosed with PCa and my PSA was 55 with a gleason-8 stage-4 with 5 bone mets that lite up under the full body bone scan. Today, my ALP is 91 IU/L with a PSA of <0.10 as of last week.
During that same time my CRP went down from .78 mg/L down to 0.52 mg/L.
well, bone ALP is more specific to bones, Alkaline phosphatases are present in many human tissues, including bone, intestine, kidney, liver, placenta and white blood cells, so a high ALP can have other reasons than bone issues.
In other words the amounts of different types of ALP in the blood may be measured and used to determine whether a high level is from the liver or bones.
Yes, I had same experience. Oddly, when my numbers were abnormal, no bone mets. The numbers can only go so far. I think commons sense and looking at your bigger picture is more important.
Thats what i am trying to figure out .My Naf,PET CT Bone scan in February showed increased uptake ,some new areas .I was on Zytiga and i am confused over ALK.Phosphatase .a year ago they were over a 100 each month .The last two months they are 54 ,second reading after stopping Zytiga for a month ?I guess Zytiga reduces the Alk Phosphatase ?
Content on HealthUnlocked does not replace the relationship between you and doctors or other healthcare professionals nor the advice you receive from them.
Never delay seeking advice or dialling emergency services because of something that you have read on HealthUnlocked.